COVID-19大流行期间的小学数学:没有证据表明适应性实践结果存在学习差距

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Martijn Meeter
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间的小学数学:没有证据表明适应性实践结果存在学习差距","authors":"Martijn Meeter","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic induced many governments to close schools for months. Evidence so far suggests that learning has suffered as a result. Here, it is investigated whether forms of computer-assisted learning mitigated the decrements in learning observed during the lockdown.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Performance of 53,656 primary school students who used adaptive practicing software for mathematics was compared to performance of similar students in the preceding year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the lockdown progress was faster than it had been the year before, contradicting results reported so far. These enhanced gains were correlated with increased use, and remained after the lockdown ended. This was the case for all grades but more so for lower grades and for weak students, but less so for students in schools with disadvantaged populations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that adaptive practicing software may mitigate, or even reverse, the negative effects of school closures on mathematics learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487463/pdf/","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary school mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic: No evidence of learning gaps in adaptive practicing results\",\"authors\":\"Martijn Meeter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic induced many governments to close schools for months. Evidence so far suggests that learning has suffered as a result. Here, it is investigated whether forms of computer-assisted learning mitigated the decrements in learning observed during the lockdown.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Performance of 53,656 primary school students who used adaptive practicing software for mathematics was compared to performance of similar students in the preceding year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the lockdown progress was faster than it had been the year before, contradicting results reported so far. These enhanced gains were correlated with increased use, and remained after the lockdown ended. This was the case for all grades but more so for lower grades and for weak students, but less so for students in schools with disadvantaged populations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that adaptive practicing software may mitigate, or even reverse, the negative effects of school closures on mathematics learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949321000156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949321000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

COVID-19大流行导致许多政府关闭学校数月。迄今为止的证据表明,学习受到了影响。在这里,研究人员调查了计算机辅助学习的形式是否减轻了封锁期间观察到的学习减少。方法对53,656名使用自适应数学练习软件的小学生进行上一年度与同类学生成绩的比较。结果在封锁期间,进展比前一年更快,这与迄今报告的结果相矛盾。这些增加的收益与使用的增加相关,并在封锁结束后保持不变。所有年级的学生都是如此,但对低年级和成绩差的学生更是如此,而对弱势群体学校的学生则不那么如此。这些结果表明,适应性练习软件可以减轻甚至逆转学校关闭对数学学习的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Primary school mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic: No evidence of learning gaps in adaptive practicing results

Primary school mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic: No evidence of learning gaps in adaptive practicing results

Primary school mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic: No evidence of learning gaps in adaptive practicing results

Primary school mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic: No evidence of learning gaps in adaptive practicing results

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic induced many governments to close schools for months. Evidence so far suggests that learning has suffered as a result. Here, it is investigated whether forms of computer-assisted learning mitigated the decrements in learning observed during the lockdown.

Method

Performance of 53,656 primary school students who used adaptive practicing software for mathematics was compared to performance of similar students in the preceding year.

Results

During the lockdown progress was faster than it had been the year before, contradicting results reported so far. These enhanced gains were correlated with increased use, and remained after the lockdown ended. This was the case for all grades but more so for lower grades and for weak students, but less so for students in schools with disadvantaged populations.

Conclusions

These results suggest that adaptive practicing software may mitigate, or even reverse, the negative effects of school closures on mathematics learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信