加勒比海国家教师神经神话的横断面研究

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Satyavi Bissessar, Farid F Youssef
{"title":"加勒比海国家教师神经神话的横断面研究","authors":"Satyavi Bissessar,&nbsp;Farid F Youssef","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The current COVID-19 pandemic and proliferation of misinformation regarding science highlights the importance of improving general science literacy. The continued preponderance of neuromyths among educators is of concern, especially in lower- and middle-income countries.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Using an adapted questionnaire, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among teachers in a small island developing state in the Caribbean.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two-thirds of the sample were unable to recognise at least 50% of the myths. Regression analysis<span> demonstrated that higher scores in brain knowledge and exposure to prior teacher-training increased belief in neuromyths. On the other hand, specific in-service training pertaining to educational neuroscience improved scores.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neuromyths are prevalent among teachers and appear to inform their teaching practice. Further research needs to be conducted to explore not just the prevalence of these myths but in what ways they may be impacting teaching and learning outcomes in the classroom.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-sectional study of neuromyths among teachers in a Caribbean nation\",\"authors\":\"Satyavi Bissessar,&nbsp;Farid F Youssef\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The current COVID-19 pandemic and proliferation of misinformation regarding science highlights the importance of improving general science literacy. The continued preponderance of neuromyths among educators is of concern, especially in lower- and middle-income countries.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Using an adapted questionnaire, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among teachers in a small island developing state in the Caribbean.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two-thirds of the sample were unable to recognise at least 50% of the myths. Regression analysis<span> demonstrated that higher scores in brain knowledge and exposure to prior teacher-training increased belief in neuromyths. On the other hand, specific in-service training pertaining to educational neuroscience improved scores.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neuromyths are prevalent among teachers and appear to inform their teaching practice. Further research needs to be conducted to explore not just the prevalence of these myths but in what ways they may be impacting teaching and learning outcomes in the classroom.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949321000077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949321000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

当前的COVID-19大流行和有关科学的错误信息的扩散凸显了提高普遍科学素养的重要性。神经学神话在教育工作者中的持续盛行令人担忧,尤其是在中低收入国家。方法采用改编问卷,对加勒比地区一个小岛屿发展中国家的教师进行了横断面调查。结果三分之二的样本不能识别至少50%的神话。回归分析表明,大脑知识得分越高,接受过教师培训的孩子越相信神经神话。另一方面,与教育神经科学相关的特殊在职培训提高了分数。结论神经神话在教师中普遍存在,并影响着教师的教学实践。需要进行进一步的研究,不仅要探索这些神话的普遍性,还要探索它们可能以何种方式影响课堂上的教学成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A cross-sectional study of neuromyths among teachers in a Caribbean nation

Background

The current COVID-19 pandemic and proliferation of misinformation regarding science highlights the importance of improving general science literacy. The continued preponderance of neuromyths among educators is of concern, especially in lower- and middle-income countries.

Method

Using an adapted questionnaire, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among teachers in a small island developing state in the Caribbean.

Results

Two-thirds of the sample were unable to recognise at least 50% of the myths. Regression analysis demonstrated that higher scores in brain knowledge and exposure to prior teacher-training increased belief in neuromyths. On the other hand, specific in-service training pertaining to educational neuroscience improved scores.

Conclusion

Neuromyths are prevalent among teachers and appear to inform their teaching practice. Further research needs to be conducted to explore not just the prevalence of these myths but in what ways they may be impacting teaching and learning outcomes in the classroom.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信