European History Quarterly最新文献_第2页

Book Review: Stranieri nemici: Nazionalismo e politiche di sicurezza in Italia durante la Prima guerra mondiale by Daniela Luigia Caglioti 书评：Daniela Luigia Caglioti 著的《Stranieri nemici: Nazionalismo e politiche di sicurezza in Italia durante la Prima guerra mondiale》（《世界大战前意大利的纳粹主义和安全政治》）。

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241263424

Matthew Stibbe

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Aliens: The Chequered History of Britain’s Wartime Refugees by Paul Dowswell 书评：保罗-道斯韦尔（Paul Dowswell）著《外星人：英国战时难民的坎坷历史

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241263424c

Matthew Stibbe

引用次数: 0

Pogroms Across the Former Poland-Lithuania: A Historical Overview 前波兰-立陶宛各地的大屠杀：历史概述

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241263746

Tomasz Kamusella

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Collapse: The Fall of the Soviet Union by Vladislav M. Zubok 书评崩溃：弗拉迪斯拉夫-M-祖博克著《苏联的解体

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241263424l

Francis King

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Porcelain: A History from the Heart of Europe by Suzanne L. Marchand 书评瓷器：苏珊娜-马尔尚（Suzanne L. Marchand）所著《来自欧洲心脏的历史

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241263424e

Lisa Pine

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Ni una, ni grande, ni libre. La dictadura franquista by Nicolás Sesma 书评：Ni una, ni grande, ni libre.尼古拉斯-塞斯马著的《法国独裁统治》（La dictadura franquista by Nicolás Sesma

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241263424i

Claudio Hernández Burgos

引用次数: 0

Book Review: The Invention of Terrorism in France, 1904–1939 by Chris Millington 书评：恐怖主义在法国的发明，1904-1939》，克里斯-米林顿著

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241263424f

Constance Bantman

引用次数: 0

The Anti-Cold War Left: Third World Imaginaries and Protest Cultures at the Local Level in Spain, 1968–1986 反冷战左翼：1968-1986 年西班牙地方一级的第三世界意象和抗议文化

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241261559

Andrea Davis

引用次数: 0

Rotspanier. Debate with Regard to the Classification of the Spanish Prisoners Deported to the Mauthausen Concentration Camp 罗茨帕尼埃关于被驱逐到毛特豪森集中营的西班牙囚犯分类的辩论

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241258907

Diego Martínez López

{"title":"Rotspanier. Debate with Regard to the Classification of the Spanish Prisoners Deported to the Mauthausen Concentration Camp","authors":"Diego Martínez López","doi":"10.1177/02656914241258907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02656914241258907","url":null,"abstract":"Spanish prisoners deported to the Mauthausen Nazi concentration camp were treated and classified in an anomalous and problematic fashion that did not correspond to the real reasons for their detention. Thus, despite being prosecuted as Rotspaniers – ‘red Spaniards’ – a category initially employed to designate those Germans who had fought in the Spanish Civil War in support of the republican government, they were systematically forced to wear a blue badge that, according to the codes usually implemented in camps, classified them as ‘emigrants’, an equally strange category that was applied to all those Jews or political exiles who had fled Germany following the rise of Nazism but had been arrested upon their return to the country. This reality, however, was not shared by the other Spaniards distributed across the other camps in the system or by the other Rotspaniers present in Mauthausen, who were given the red badge that indicated they were political prisoners. This is the anomaly addressed by this article, which, based on study of the administrative sources at Mauthausen and thorough analysis of ‘protective custody’ as a legal instrument employed by the Nazi authorities to neutralize their enemies, enables us to revisit the debate and propose a new interpretative framework through which to re-evaluate the Spanish experience in the network of German camps.","PeriodicalId":44713,"journal":{"name":"European History Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141895279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Nazi Constitutional Designs: The State Secretaries’ Meetings and the Annexation of East Central Europe 纳粹的宪法设计：国务秘书会议与吞并中东欧

IF 0.3 3区历史学

European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI: 10.1177/02656914241237731

Darren O’Byrne

{"title":"Nazi Constitutional Designs: The State Secretaries’ Meetings and the Annexation of East Central Europe","authors":"Darren O’Byrne","doi":"10.1177/02656914241237731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02656914241237731","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the state secretaries’ meetings as an instrument of government in Nazi Germany. They are mostly known as the forum at which the infamous Wannsee Conference took place, but here the 20 January 1942 meeting will be situated in a context previously ignored by historians by showing that such gatherings were an increasingly regular occurrence during the ‘Third Reich’, and that a range of policy issues were discussed there – not just mass murder. As such, it will shed new light on how the ‘Hitler state’ functioned at this level by showing that Wannsee was not entirely extraordinary, the format having become established practice long before 1942. Similarly, the article will also show that the jurisdictional conflicts that played out at Wannsee were equally common, with participants generally jockeying for influence and advancing claims to departmental authority. Indeed, although they effectively replaced cabinet meetings, which were formally banned by Hitler in 1938, the state secretaries’ meetings did little to salvage collegial government. To illustrate this, a series of meetings called to coordinate the government's response to a particular issue will be examined – the annexation of ‘Greater German’ territories in Austria, the Sudetenland and Poland. As will be shown throughout, very little was achieved by way of coordination, with the state secretaries only advancing those constitutional designs that served their ministries’ claims to power.","PeriodicalId":44713,"journal":{"name":"European History Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140542143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0