Trailblazing the Transition: Moving Beyond Limits to Growth in the Netherlands During the Long 1970s

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Jonne Harmsma
{"title":"Trailblazing the Transition: Moving Beyond Limits to Growth in the Netherlands During the Long 1970s","authors":"Jonne Harmsma","doi":"10.1177/02656914251356118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The politicization of the environment in the 1970s involved a paradigmatic challenge to the ‘hegemony of growth’. In the Netherlands, this economic growth debate was particularly fierce and long-lasting, with protagonists among left-wing parties, Christian democrats, and right-wing liberals, all advocating some sort of ‘limits to growth’. Moreover, the Dutch growth debate also took on a policymaking dimension. Propelled by earlier attempts to implement ‘selectivity’ in certain policies, the Selective Growth Memorandum of 1976 set out to surpass the hegemony of growth and align environmental and economic objectives. As such, the Dutch growth debate of the early 1970s inspired a rapprochement in which environmental regulation was framed as a positive-sum game in consonance with economic considerations by stimulating investments, productivity, and growth. Even though the memorandum ultimately ended up primarily re-articulating the growth paradigm, this article highlights that discursively, it still prefigured the discourse of ecological modernization that would dominate the environmental discourse in the 1980s and 1990s.","PeriodicalId":44713,"journal":{"name":"European History Quarterly","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European History Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02656914251356118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The politicization of the environment in the 1970s involved a paradigmatic challenge to the ‘hegemony of growth’. In the Netherlands, this economic growth debate was particularly fierce and long-lasting, with protagonists among left-wing parties, Christian democrats, and right-wing liberals, all advocating some sort of ‘limits to growth’. Moreover, the Dutch growth debate also took on a policymaking dimension. Propelled by earlier attempts to implement ‘selectivity’ in certain policies, the Selective Growth Memorandum of 1976 set out to surpass the hegemony of growth and align environmental and economic objectives. As such, the Dutch growth debate of the early 1970s inspired a rapprochement in which environmental regulation was framed as a positive-sum game in consonance with economic considerations by stimulating investments, productivity, and growth. Even though the memorandum ultimately ended up primarily re-articulating the growth paradigm, this article highlights that discursively, it still prefigured the discourse of ecological modernization that would dominate the environmental discourse in the 1980s and 1990s.
开拓转型:在漫长的20世纪70年代超越荷兰增长的极限
20世纪70年代的环境政治化涉及对“增长霸权”的典型挑战。在荷兰,关于经济增长的辩论尤其激烈和持久,左翼政党、基督教民主主义者和右翼自由主义者都主张某种形式的“增长限制”。此外,关于荷兰增长的辩论还涉及到政策制定层面。在早期尝试在某些政策中实施“选择性”的推动下,1976年的“选择性增长备忘录”开始超越增长的霸权,并将环境和经济目标结合起来。因此,20世纪70年代初的荷兰增长辩论激发了一种和解,在这种和解中,环境监管被视为一种正和游戏,通过刺激投资、生产率和增长,与经济考虑相一致。尽管备忘录最终主要是重新阐述了增长范式,但本文强调了这一点,它仍然预示了生态现代化的话语,这种话语将在20世纪80年代和90年代主导环境话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: European History Quarterly has earned an international reputation as an essential resource on European history, publishing articles by eminent historians on a range of subjects from the later Middle Ages to post-1945. European History Quarterly also features review articles by leading authorities, offering a comprehensive survey of recent literature in a particular field, as well as an extensive book review section, enabling you to keep up to date with what"s being published in your field. The journal also features historiographical essays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信