{"title":"When German Soldiers Became Belgian Veterans: A Cross-Border Mixed Economy of Veteran Welfare After the First World War","authors":"Machteld Venken","doi":"10.1177/02656914261481338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02656914261481338","url":null,"abstract":"When the regions of Eupen, Sankt Vith and Malmedy switched from German to Belgian state sovereignty in the aftermath of the First World War, the local inhabitants who had served in the German army had welfare needs, demands or aspirations that could no longer be legitimated by means of war service and sacrifice for their nation-state. This article investigates how German soldiers became Belgian veterans. Challenging state-centred interpretations of how war veterans related to welfare, this article approaches these German–Belgian borderlands as a space shaped jointly by states, institutions and borderland veterans. Their interactions gave rise to a unique assemblage of Belgian public and German private welfare measures: a cross-border mixed economy of veteran welfare. The borderland veterans received higher financial benefits compensating for their disabilities from their new state than if their places of residence had remained within Germany, as Belgian state benefits were higher and German private welfare organizations sent additional benefits across the Western state border. Nevertheless, they resented that they could not attain identical financial recognition for their service as other Belgian veterans.","PeriodicalId":44713,"journal":{"name":"European History Quarterly","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149123321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Financial Compensation from the Federal Republic of Germany for\u0000 Wehrmacht\u0000 Soldiers from Luxembourg, Alsace-Moselle and Eupen-Malmedy","authors":"Christoph Brüll","doi":"10.1177/02656914261479130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02656914261479130","url":null,"abstract":"The issue of financial compensation for ‘forced conscripts’ into the <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Wehrmacht</jats:italic> from Luxembourg, Alsace-Moselle, and Eupen-Malmedy was a complex and prolonged matter in postwar Europe. From the 1950s to the 1980s, the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) negotiated different agreements with Luxembourg, Belgium, and France, each with unique political and legal implications. While Belgium and France largely approached the issue as part of broader victim compensation frameworks, Luxembourg saw it as a distinct historical injustice, leading to significant diplomatic tensions. The FRG initially resisted financial compensation, citing the 1953 London Agreement on German External Debts, which postponed war reparations. However, persistent lobbying by associations of forced conscripts, coupled with diplomatic pressure from neighbouring governments, led to negotiated settlements. In 1959, Luxembourg secured financial support based on the Federal War Victims’ Benefit Law, but the agreement was controversial domestically. Belgium reached a similar settlement in 1962, followed by an additional agreement in 1973. France, initially reluctant to pursue claims, negotiated a settlement in 1981, resulting in the creation of the <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Entente Franco-Allemande</jats:italic> foundation, funded by West Germany. Luxembourg, leveraging the French precedent, finalized its own settlement in 1985. Throughout these negotiations, the FRG consistently avoided recognizing forced conscription as a Nazi-specific injustice. Instead, compensation was framed, like in West Germany itself, as welfare benefits for war victims rather than reparations for coerced military service. This study examines the evolving German governmental stance, the influence of national and regional political actors, and the intersection of memory politics with financial settlements.","PeriodicalId":44713,"journal":{"name":"European History Quarterly","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149124034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}