Imperial Boomerang: Ruling the British Zone of Germany, 1945–1949

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Camilo Erlichman
{"title":"Imperial Boomerang: Ruling the British Zone of Germany, 1945–1949","authors":"Camilo Erlichman","doi":"10.1177/02656914251349738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Military occupation and imperial domination have often been regarded as two distinctive ruling systems. This article calls this dichotomy into question and looks at how imperial ruling techniques informed occupation practices in mid-twentieth-century Europe. Through an analysis of the British occupation of north-western Germany after the Second World War, the article provides an in-depth exploration of the imperial experiences, imaginaries, and discourses of some of the key officials involved in the British Military Government, tracing how their imperial store of knowledge shaped their attitudes in Germany. In doing so, the article concentrates on the lineages of ‘indirect rule’, which became the central ruling strategy of the occupation authorities. It then explores its implementation on the ground through the system of local <jats:italic>Kreis Resident Officers</jats:italic> . In a final step, the article assesses the larger impact of this ruling technique on different social groups in the British Zone, including German officials, trade unionists, and clergymen. The article argues that the British decision to use a specific set of notables as social intermediaries had significant socio-political consequences. The application of indirect rule led to the suspension of the political process and allowed for the resurgence of local notable elites who had seen their power marginalized by the emergence of mass politics in the previous decades. With the end of occupation and the re-establishment of effective state authority, the social winners of the occupation used their novel influence to dominate national politics. The article contends that the marriage of occupation and imperial ruling techniques had a strikingly conservative impact that may help to explain the distinctive character of the post-war political order.","PeriodicalId":44713,"journal":{"name":"European History Quarterly","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European History Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02656914251349738","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Military occupation and imperial domination have often been regarded as two distinctive ruling systems. This article calls this dichotomy into question and looks at how imperial ruling techniques informed occupation practices in mid-twentieth-century Europe. Through an analysis of the British occupation of north-western Germany after the Second World War, the article provides an in-depth exploration of the imperial experiences, imaginaries, and discourses of some of the key officials involved in the British Military Government, tracing how their imperial store of knowledge shaped their attitudes in Germany. In doing so, the article concentrates on the lineages of ‘indirect rule’, which became the central ruling strategy of the occupation authorities. It then explores its implementation on the ground through the system of local Kreis Resident Officers . In a final step, the article assesses the larger impact of this ruling technique on different social groups in the British Zone, including German officials, trade unionists, and clergymen. The article argues that the British decision to use a specific set of notables as social intermediaries had significant socio-political consequences. The application of indirect rule led to the suspension of the political process and allowed for the resurgence of local notable elites who had seen their power marginalized by the emergence of mass politics in the previous decades. With the end of occupation and the re-establishment of effective state authority, the social winners of the occupation used their novel influence to dominate national politics. The article contends that the marriage of occupation and imperial ruling techniques had a strikingly conservative impact that may help to explain the distinctive character of the post-war political order.
帝国回旋镖:统治德国英属占领区,1945-1949
军事占领和帝国统治通常被视为两种截然不同的统治制度。这篇文章对这种二分法提出了质疑,并着眼于帝国统治技术如何影响二十世纪中期欧洲的占领实践。通过对二战后英国占领德国西北部的分析,本文深入探讨了英国军政府中一些关键官员的帝国经历、想象和话语,追踪了他们的帝国知识储备如何塑造了他们在德国的态度。在此过程中,文章集中于“间接统治”的血统,这成为占领当局的核心统治策略。然后探讨通过当地Kreis驻地官员制度在当地的实施情况。在最后一步,本文评估了这种统治技术对英国管区不同社会群体的更大影响,包括德国官员、工会会员和神职人员。这篇文章认为,英国决定使用一组特定的名人作为社会中介,产生了重大的社会政治后果。间接统治的应用导致了政治进程的暂停,并允许当地著名精英的复兴,这些精英在过去几十年里因大众政治的出现而被边缘化。随着占领的结束和有效的国家权威的重新建立,占领的社会赢家利用他们的新影响力主宰了国家政治。这篇文章认为,占领和帝国统治技巧的结合产生了惊人的保守影响,这可能有助于解释战后政治秩序的独特特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: European History Quarterly has earned an international reputation as an essential resource on European history, publishing articles by eminent historians on a range of subjects from the later Middle Ages to post-1945. European History Quarterly also features review articles by leading authorities, offering a comprehensive survey of recent literature in a particular field, as well as an extensive book review section, enabling you to keep up to date with what"s being published in your field. The journal also features historiographical essays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信