Journal of Chiropractic Education最新文献

{"title":"Developing a standardized curriculum for teaching chiropractic technique.","authors":"Brian J Gleberzon,&nbsp;Robert Cooperstein,&nbsp;Christopher Good,&nbsp;Christopher Roecker,&nbsp;Charles Blum","doi":"10.7899/JCE-20-2","DOIUrl":"10.7899/JCE-20-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This is a report of the results of 4 facilitated workshops aimed at developing a standardized chiropractic technique curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workshops were held at research conferences during 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2019. Participants were tasked with developing recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures appropriate for chiropractic technique programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For diagnostic procedures, there was general agreement among participants that chiropractic programs should include diagnostic imaging, postural assessment, gait analysis, palpation (static, motion, and joint play/springing), global range of motion, and evidence-based orthopedic/neurological tests. No consensus could be reached with respect to chiropractic x-ray line marking (spinography) nor heat sensing instruments, and there was only partial consensus on leg length assessment. For therapeutic procedures, all participants agreed that the following should be included: high-velocity, low amplitude spinal and extremity manipulation, adjustments assisted by hand-held instruments, drop tables, flexion-distraction tables, and pelvic blocks. There was unanimous support for teaching mobilization of the spine and peripheral joints, as well as for manual and instrument-assisted soft tissue therapies. There were some overarching issues: participants strongly preferred assessment methods known to be reliable and valid and therapeutic procedures known to be safe and effective. Where evidence was lacking, they insisted that diagnostic and therapeutic methods at minimum have face validity and biological plausibility. However, they cautioned against applying aspects of evidence-based care too rigidly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite differing views on chiropractic terminology, philosophy, and scope of practice, participants' opinions were similar regarding diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that ought to be included in chiropractic technique programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 2","pages":"249-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528435/pdf/i1042-5055-35-2-249.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25565105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Characteristics of chiropractic patients treated at the University of Johannesburg chiropractic student clinic and relevance to the educational process.","authors":"Fatima Ismail, Naomi Booysen, Christopher Yelverton, Cynthia Peterson","doi":"10.7899/JCE-19-29","DOIUrl":"10.7899/JCE-19-29","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the demographic and descriptive information of new patients presenting to an educational institution-based chiropractic student clinic in South Africa that could then be used to draw comparisons to other international chiropractic student clinics and local practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of all new patient files from January 1, 2016, to July 31, 2016. The variables extracted were age, health profiles, number of musculoskeletal complaints, treatment protocol, and number of treatments that patients received for the initial complaint. Data were analyzed using cross-tabulations and multidimensional χ2 tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 865 files reviewed. Most patients were aged between 20 and 24 years. Lumbar and pelvic complaints were most common (42.2%), followed by the cervical spine (28%). Lumbar (18.8%) and cervical (16.8%) biomechanical conditions, followed by lumbar myofascial pain syndrome (7.6%), were the most common problems. Musculoskeletal conditions were reported in 99% of cases. The majority (80%) of patients received 9 or fewer treatments for their initial complaint. Manipulation was used in 93.9% of cases, followed by mobilization (8.8%), interferential current (23.5%), and dry needling (19.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data gathered suggest that there are some general similarities with international training institutions. There are also differences between the study sample and international institutions and South African private chiropractic practice. The dissimilarities were a younger patient population, a lower number of treatment visits, and low exposure to nonmusculoskeletal conditions. These differences may affect the breadth of student education and require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 2","pages":"215-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528433/pdf/i1042-5055-35-2-215.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38707427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Practice analysis and changes to the Chiropractic Board of Clinical Nutrition diplomate exam.","authors":"Bruce L Shotts,&nbsp;Igor Himelfarb,&nbsp;Greg L Crawford,&nbsp;Justin Harding,&nbsp;Andrew R Gow","doi":"10.7899/JCE-19-16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-19-16","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main objective of this study was to report results of the practice analysis survey and to provide insights into the average levels of performance and the importance of professional tasks executed by chiropractic nutritionists. In addition, this study informs the chiropractic community of the changes made to the Chiropractic Board of Clinical Nutrition diplomate exam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-eight practicing chiropractic nutritionists responded to the practice analysis survey. Their responses were analyzed, and conclusions about frequency and importance of performance tasks were reached. A panel of subject matter experts provided a qualitative review of the survey responses. The quantitative and qualitative analyses of the survey responses indicated that minor changes to the test plan were needed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistical techniques were employed to analyze the survey responses. The qualitative panel suggested reducing the number of domains on the nutrition exam from 7 to 6 by combining Laboratory and Nutrition-Specific Testing and Imaging and Other Special Studies domains. Additionally, the panel decided on the final distribution of weights combining the quantitative results with qualitative perspectives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The practice analysis is a first step in the definition of the skills required for practicing chiropractic nutritionists. The analysis becomes one of the references and a decision-making tool used by the board for developing and administrating quality assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 2","pages":"171-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528437/pdf/i1042-5055-35-2-171.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38477955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Chiropractic program changes facilitated by the European Council on Chiropractic Education Accreditation reports.","authors":"Cynthia K Peterson,&nbsp;Joyce Miller,&nbsp;B Kim Humphreys,&nbsp;Ken Vall","doi":"10.7899/JCE-20-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-20-10","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The European Council on Chiropractic Education (ECCE) currently accredits 10 programs throughout Europe and South Africa. It is assumed that ECCE evaluation activities lead to changes to the chiropractic programs but no systematic evaluation as to whether this is true, and the extent of changes has previously been done. The purpose of this study was to obtain feedback from program heads as to whether ECCE evaluation reports facilitated changes/improvements to their programs and to identify their reported changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed methods audit study using questionnaires with 2 sections. Closed statements requesting the degree of change to each section of the \"Standards\" based on ECCE evaluation reports (substantial, some, none) were analyzed using frequencies. Written responses identifying the specific changes made based on previous evaluation reports were evaluated independently by 3 researchers using a modified \"thematic analysis\" approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 10 accredited programs responded. Seven of the 10 programs (70%) reported \"some\" or \"substantial\" changes to ≥ 6 sections of the ECCE Standards. The most common section with reported changes was \"Educational Program\" (8 of 10). \"Educational Resources\" had the largest number of programs reporting \"substantial changes\" (4) and was the second most common section to have reported changes. The main themes identified emphasized changes in \"infrastructure, equipment and faculty,\" \"increasing evidence-based practice,\" and \"instilling a research culture in faculty and students.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECCE accreditation processes facilitate changes to the chiropractic programs, particularly in the areas of improved infrastructure and faculty, research, and evidence-based practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 2","pages":"242-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528436/pdf/i1042-5055-35-2-242.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25370529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 5: Evidence exposed.","authors":"Claire D Johnson,&nbsp;Bart N Green","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-26","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This is the fifth article in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of events surrounding the eventual end of the AMA's Committee on Quackery and the exposure of evidence of the AMA's efforts to boycott the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 articles following a successive timeline. This article, the fifth of the series, explores the exposure of what the AMA had been doing, which provided evidence that was eventually used in the Wilk v AMA antitrust lawsuit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prime mission of the AMA's Committee on Quackery was \"first, the containment of chiropractic and, ultimately, the elimination of chiropractic.\" However, the committee did not complete its mission and quietly disbanded in 1974. This was the same year that the chiropractic profession finally gained licensure in all 50 of the United States; received recognition from the US Commissioner of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare; and was successfully included in Medicare. In 1975, documents reportedly obtained by the Church of Scientology covert operatives under Operation AMA Doom revealed the extent to which the AMA and its Committee on Quackery had been working to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession. The AMA actions included influencing mainstream media, decisions made by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, and the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Other actions included publishing propaganda against chiropractic and implementing an anti-chiropractic program aimed at medical students, medical societies, and the American public.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After more than a decade of overt and covert actions, the AMA chose to end its Committee on Quackery. The following year, documents exposed the extent of AMA's efforts to enact its boycott of chiropractic.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 S1","pages":"74-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493522/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-74.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39435067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 2: Rise of the American Medical Association.","authors":"Claire D Johnson, Bart N Green","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-23","DOIUrl":"10.7899/JCE-21-23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper is the second in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated anti-trust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of how the AMA rose to dominate health care in the United States, and within this social context, how the chiropractic profession fought to survive in the first half of the 20th century.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the second of the series that explores the growth of medicine and the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AMA's code of ethics established in 1847 continued to direct organized medicine's actions to exclude other health professions. During the early 1900s, the AMA established itself as \"regular medicine.\" They labeled other types of medicine and health care professions, such as chiropractic, as \"irregulars\" claiming that they were cultists and quacks. In addition to the rise in power of the AMA, a report written by Abraham Flexner helped to solidify the AMA's control over health care. Chiropractic as a profession was emerging and developing in practice, education, and science. The few resources available to chiropractors were used to defend their profession against attacks from organized medicine and to secure legislation to legalize the practice of chiropractic. After years of struggle, the last state in the US legalized chiropractic 79 years after the birth of the profession.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the first part of the 20th century, the AMA was amassing power as chiropractic was just emerging as a profession. Events such as publication of Flexner's report and development of the medical basic science laws helped to entrench the AMA's monopoly on health care. The health care environment shaped how chiropractic grew as a profession. Chiropractic practice, education, and science were challenged by trying to develop outside of the medical establishment. These events added to the tensions between the professions that ultimately resulted in the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 S1","pages":"25-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493523/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-25.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39434047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession: Overview.","authors":"Michael J Whitmer","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-20","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief overview of Looking Back at the Lawsuit That Transformed the Chiropractic Profession, which is a series of 8 research papers that explore the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association lawsuit and how these events may have had an influence on the chiropractic profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 S1","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493527/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-3.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39435066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 6: Preparing for the lawsuit.","authors":"Claire D Johnson,&nbsp;Bart N Green","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-27","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This is the sixth article in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of the plaintiffs, lead lawyer, and the events immediately before the lawsuit was filed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 articles following a successive timeline. This article, the sixth of the series, explores the plaintiffs' stories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Because of the AMA's boycott on chiropractic, chiropractors were not able to collaborate with medical physicians or refer patients to medical facilities, which resulted in restricted trade and potential harm to patients' well-being. The plaintiffs, Patricia Arthur, James Bryden, Michael Pedigo, and Chester Wilk, came from different regions of the United States. Each had unique experiences and were compelled to seek justice. The lead lawyer, Mr George McAndrews, was the son of a chiropractor and had witnessed the effect that the AMA's attacks on chiropractic had on his father. It took several years to gather enough resources to file the suit, which was submitted in 1976.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conflicts that the plaintiffs experienced stimulated them to pursue a lawsuit against the AMA and other organized political medicine groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 S1","pages":"85-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493525/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-85.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39435069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession: Authors' introduction.","authors":"Claire D Johnson,&nbsp;Bart N Green","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-21","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper provides the authors' introduction to Looking Back: A Historical Review of the Lawsuit That Transformed the Chiropractic Profession, which is a series of papers that reviews events surrounding the federal antitrust lawsuit Wilk v American Medical Association. Information in this series describes the events before, during, and after the lawsuit and the relevant issues related to the transformation of American mainstream health care and chiropractic. These papers give insight into many of the factors that shaped the chiropractic profession that we know today.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 S1","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493529/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39434046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 3: Chiropractic growth.","authors":"Claire D Johnson,&nbsp;Bart N Green","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This is the third paper in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of the growth of chiropractic, its public relations campaigns, and infighting that contributed to the events surrounding the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the third of the series that explores the growth the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the 1930s, the AMA was already under investigation for violation of antitrust laws and the National Chiropractic Association was suggesting that the AMA was establishing a health care monopoly. Chiropractic schools grew and the number of graduates rose quickly. Public relations campaigns and publications in the popular press attempted to educate the public about chiropractic. Factions within the profession polarized around differing views of how they thought that chiropractic should be practiced and portrayed to the public. The AMA leaders noted the infighting and used it to their advantage to subvert chiropractic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chiropractic grew rapidly and established its presence with the American public through public relations campaigns and popular press. However, infighting would give the AMA material to further its efforts to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 S1","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493526/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-45.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39435068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}