Chiropractic program changes facilitated by the European Council on Chiropractic Education Accreditation reports.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Cynthia K Peterson, Joyce Miller, B Kim Humphreys, Ken Vall
{"title":"Chiropractic program changes facilitated by the European Council on Chiropractic Education Accreditation reports.","authors":"Cynthia K Peterson,&nbsp;Joyce Miller,&nbsp;B Kim Humphreys,&nbsp;Ken Vall","doi":"10.7899/JCE-20-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The European Council on Chiropractic Education (ECCE) currently accredits 10 programs throughout Europe and South Africa. It is assumed that ECCE evaluation activities lead to changes to the chiropractic programs but no systematic evaluation as to whether this is true, and the extent of changes has previously been done. The purpose of this study was to obtain feedback from program heads as to whether ECCE evaluation reports facilitated changes/improvements to their programs and to identify their reported changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed methods audit study using questionnaires with 2 sections. Closed statements requesting the degree of change to each section of the \"Standards\" based on ECCE evaluation reports (substantial, some, none) were analyzed using frequencies. Written responses identifying the specific changes made based on previous evaluation reports were evaluated independently by 3 researchers using a modified \"thematic analysis\" approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 10 accredited programs responded. Seven of the 10 programs (70%) reported \"some\" or \"substantial\" changes to ≥ 6 sections of the ECCE Standards. The most common section with reported changes was \"Educational Program\" (8 of 10). \"Educational Resources\" had the largest number of programs reporting \"substantial changes\" (4) and was the second most common section to have reported changes. The main themes identified emphasized changes in \"infrastructure, equipment and faculty,\" \"increasing evidence-based practice,\" and \"instilling a research culture in faculty and students.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECCE accreditation processes facilitate changes to the chiropractic programs, particularly in the areas of improved infrastructure and faculty, research, and evidence-based practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528436/pdf/i1042-5055-35-2-242.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-20-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The European Council on Chiropractic Education (ECCE) currently accredits 10 programs throughout Europe and South Africa. It is assumed that ECCE evaluation activities lead to changes to the chiropractic programs but no systematic evaluation as to whether this is true, and the extent of changes has previously been done. The purpose of this study was to obtain feedback from program heads as to whether ECCE evaluation reports facilitated changes/improvements to their programs and to identify their reported changes.

Methods: This was a mixed methods audit study using questionnaires with 2 sections. Closed statements requesting the degree of change to each section of the "Standards" based on ECCE evaluation reports (substantial, some, none) were analyzed using frequencies. Written responses identifying the specific changes made based on previous evaluation reports were evaluated independently by 3 researchers using a modified "thematic analysis" approach.

Results: All 10 accredited programs responded. Seven of the 10 programs (70%) reported "some" or "substantial" changes to ≥ 6 sections of the ECCE Standards. The most common section with reported changes was "Educational Program" (8 of 10). "Educational Resources" had the largest number of programs reporting "substantial changes" (4) and was the second most common section to have reported changes. The main themes identified emphasized changes in "infrastructure, equipment and faculty," "increasing evidence-based practice," and "instilling a research culture in faculty and students."

Conclusion: ECCE accreditation processes facilitate changes to the chiropractic programs, particularly in the areas of improved infrastructure and faculty, research, and evidence-based practice.

欧洲脊医教育认证委员会促进了脊医项目的变化。
目的:欧洲脊医教育委员会(ECCE)目前在欧洲和南非认可了10个项目。假设ECCE评估活动会导致脊椎指压疗法项目的改变,但没有系统的评估是否属实,而且改变的程度之前已经做过了。本研究的目的是从项目负责人那里获得反馈,了解ECCE评估报告是否促进了他们项目的变化/改进,并确定他们报告的变化。方法:采用两部分问卷调查,采用混合方法进行审计研究。使用频率分析基于ECCE评估报告(实质性、部分、无)的要求对“标准”每个部分更改程度的封闭声明。3名研究人员使用一种改进的“专题分析”方法,独立评估了确定在以前评价报告基础上所作具体改变的书面答复。结果:所有10个认证项目都做出了回应。10个项目中有7个(70%)报告对ECCE标准的6个以上部分进行了“一些”或“实质性”更改。变更最多的部分是“教育计划”(8 / 10)。“教育资源”有最多的项目报告了“实质性的变化”(4),并且是报告变化的第二常见的部分。确定的主题强调了“基础设施、设备和教师”、“增加循证实践”和“向教师和学生灌输研究文化”方面的变化。结论:ECCE认证过程促进了脊椎指压疗法项目的变化,特别是在改善基础设施和教师、研究和循证实践方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信