Developing a standardized curriculum for teaching chiropractic technique.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Brian J Gleberzon, Robert Cooperstein, Christopher Good, Christopher Roecker, Charles Blum
{"title":"Developing a standardized curriculum for teaching chiropractic technique.","authors":"Brian J Gleberzon,&nbsp;Robert Cooperstein,&nbsp;Christopher Good,&nbsp;Christopher Roecker,&nbsp;Charles Blum","doi":"10.7899/JCE-20-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This is a report of the results of 4 facilitated workshops aimed at developing a standardized chiropractic technique curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workshops were held at research conferences during 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2019. Participants were tasked with developing recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures appropriate for chiropractic technique programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For diagnostic procedures, there was general agreement among participants that chiropractic programs should include diagnostic imaging, postural assessment, gait analysis, palpation (static, motion, and joint play/springing), global range of motion, and evidence-based orthopedic/neurological tests. No consensus could be reached with respect to chiropractic x-ray line marking (spinography) nor heat sensing instruments, and there was only partial consensus on leg length assessment. For therapeutic procedures, all participants agreed that the following should be included: high-velocity, low amplitude spinal and extremity manipulation, adjustments assisted by hand-held instruments, drop tables, flexion-distraction tables, and pelvic blocks. There was unanimous support for teaching mobilization of the spine and peripheral joints, as well as for manual and instrument-assisted soft tissue therapies. There were some overarching issues: participants strongly preferred assessment methods known to be reliable and valid and therapeutic procedures known to be safe and effective. Where evidence was lacking, they insisted that diagnostic and therapeutic methods at minimum have face validity and biological plausibility. However, they cautioned against applying aspects of evidence-based care too rigidly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite differing views on chiropractic terminology, philosophy, and scope of practice, participants' opinions were similar regarding diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that ought to be included in chiropractic technique programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528435/pdf/i1042-5055-35-2-249.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-20-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: This is a report of the results of 4 facilitated workshops aimed at developing a standardized chiropractic technique curriculum.

Methods: Workshops were held at research conferences during 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2019. Participants were tasked with developing recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures appropriate for chiropractic technique programs.

Results: For diagnostic procedures, there was general agreement among participants that chiropractic programs should include diagnostic imaging, postural assessment, gait analysis, palpation (static, motion, and joint play/springing), global range of motion, and evidence-based orthopedic/neurological tests. No consensus could be reached with respect to chiropractic x-ray line marking (spinography) nor heat sensing instruments, and there was only partial consensus on leg length assessment. For therapeutic procedures, all participants agreed that the following should be included: high-velocity, low amplitude spinal and extremity manipulation, adjustments assisted by hand-held instruments, drop tables, flexion-distraction tables, and pelvic blocks. There was unanimous support for teaching mobilization of the spine and peripheral joints, as well as for manual and instrument-assisted soft tissue therapies. There were some overarching issues: participants strongly preferred assessment methods known to be reliable and valid and therapeutic procedures known to be safe and effective. Where evidence was lacking, they insisted that diagnostic and therapeutic methods at minimum have face validity and biological plausibility. However, they cautioned against applying aspects of evidence-based care too rigidly.

Conclusions: Despite differing views on chiropractic terminology, philosophy, and scope of practice, participants' opinions were similar regarding diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that ought to be included in chiropractic technique programs.

Abstract Image

开发一套标准化的脊椎指压疗法课程。
目的:这是一份关于4个促进研讨会的结果报告,旨在制定标准化的脊骨神经医学技术课程。方法:在2014年、2016年、2018年和2019年的研究会议上举办研讨会。参与者的任务是制定适合脊骨神经医学技术项目的诊断和治疗程序建议。结果:对于诊断程序,参与者普遍认为脊骨神经医学项目应包括诊断成像、姿势评估、步态分析、触诊(静态、运动和关节运动/弹跳)、整体运动范围和循证骨科/神经系统测试。在脊骨神经医学x射线标记(脊柱造影)和热感测仪器方面没有达成共识,在腿长评估方面也只有部分共识。对于治疗程序,所有参与者都同意应包括以下内容:高速、低振幅脊柱和四肢操作、手持器械辅助调整、升降台、屈曲牵引台和骨盆块。一致支持脊柱和周围关节的教学动员,以及手动和器械辅助软组织治疗。有一些首要问题:参与者强烈倾向于已知可靠有效的评估方法和已知安全有效的治疗程序。在缺乏证据的情况下,他们坚持认为诊断和治疗方法至少具有表面有效性和生物学合理性。然而,他们提醒不要过于严格地应用循证护理。结论:尽管对脊骨神经医学的术语、哲学和实践范围有不同的看法,但参与者对应纳入脊骨神经科学技术项目的诊断和治疗程序的看法是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信