Evaluation of an online case-based learning module that integrates basic and clinical sciences.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Christine A Major, Kara D Burnham, Kathryn A Brown, Chad D Lambert, Jenny M Nordeen, Leslie A K Takaki
{"title":"Evaluation of an online case-based learning module that integrates basic and clinical sciences.","authors":"Christine A Major,&nbsp;Kara D Burnham,&nbsp;Kathryn A Brown,&nbsp;Chad D Lambert,&nbsp;Jenny M Nordeen,&nbsp;Leslie A K Takaki","doi":"10.7899/JCE-20-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Case-based online modules can be created to integrate basic science and clinical science knowledge. An integrated module was designed, implemented, and evaluated for student performance and perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five faculty members from both basic science and clinical education departments developed an integrative, online, case-based learning module. The case involved a patient with facial asymmetry, and the student was led to a diagnosis of Bell's palsy. Material on Bell's palsy was presented in an integrated module in addition to traditional lecture for a fall cohort of students and was presented only in traditional lecture format to a winter cohort of students. Both cohorts were given the same 5 multiple-choice questions on Bell's palsy as part of a midterm exam, and the scores of these test questions were compared between cohorts. A 13-question, mixed-methods survey was given to the fall cohort to determine their perceptions of the module and their learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple-choice test question performance was equivalent between cohorts for the Bell's palsy questions (fall 2018: mean = 3.68, SD = 0.99; winter 2019: mean = 3.51, SD = 0.92). Perception survey responses indicated that students felt positively about the integrated module and that it was applicable and helpful with improving, reinforcing, and integrating basic science and clinical knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that case-based integrated modules are perceived favorably by students and result in similar exam question performance. They can be a useful tool to help students connect information throughout the chiropractic curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528434/pdf/i1042-5055-35-2-192.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-20-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Case-based online modules can be created to integrate basic science and clinical science knowledge. An integrated module was designed, implemented, and evaluated for student performance and perception.

Methods: Five faculty members from both basic science and clinical education departments developed an integrative, online, case-based learning module. The case involved a patient with facial asymmetry, and the student was led to a diagnosis of Bell's palsy. Material on Bell's palsy was presented in an integrated module in addition to traditional lecture for a fall cohort of students and was presented only in traditional lecture format to a winter cohort of students. Both cohorts were given the same 5 multiple-choice questions on Bell's palsy as part of a midterm exam, and the scores of these test questions were compared between cohorts. A 13-question, mixed-methods survey was given to the fall cohort to determine their perceptions of the module and their learning.

Results: Multiple-choice test question performance was equivalent between cohorts for the Bell's palsy questions (fall 2018: mean = 3.68, SD = 0.99; winter 2019: mean = 3.51, SD = 0.92). Perception survey responses indicated that students felt positively about the integrated module and that it was applicable and helpful with improving, reinforcing, and integrating basic science and clinical knowledge.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence that case-based integrated modules are perceived favorably by students and result in similar exam question performance. They can be a useful tool to help students connect information throughout the chiropractic curriculum.

Abstract Image

评估整合基础科学和临床科学的在线案例学习模块。
目的:创建基于病例的在线模块,整合基础科学与临床科学知识。一个集成的模块被设计,实施,并评估学生的表现和感知。方法:来自基础科学和临床教育部门的五名教师开发了一个综合的、在线的、基于案例的学习模块。该病例涉及一名面部不对称的患者,该学生被诊断为贝尔麻痹。关于贝尔麻痹症的材料在秋季学生的传统讲座之外以一个集成模块的形式呈现,并且只以传统的讲座形式呈现给冬季学生。作为期中考试的一部分,两组人都被给出了相同的5道关于贝尔麻痹症的多项选择题,并在两组人之间比较了这些问题的分数。一项包含13个问题的混合方法调查被给予了秋季队列,以确定他们对模块和学习的看法。结果:贝尔麻痹问题的多项选择题在队列之间的表现相当(2018年秋季:平均值= 3.68,SD = 0.99;2019年冬季:平均值= 3.51,SD = 0.92)。感知调查结果表明,学生对整合模块的评价是积极的,认为其适用于基础科学和临床知识的完善、加强和整合。结论:本研究提供了证据,证明基于案例的集成模块被学生所接受,并导致类似的考试问题表现。他们可以是一个有用的工具,帮助学生连接整个脊椎指压疗法课程的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信