Legal Education Review最新文献_第7页

Learning by Doing: The Benefits of Experiential Learning in Animals and the Law 从实践中学习:动物和法律中体验式学习的好处

IF 0.3

Legal Education Review Pub Date : 2016-01-20 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2719240

P. Sankoff

引用次数: 0

'Warning! Graphic Content Ahead': Advocating for Graphic Video in the Teaching of Animal Law “警告!“图文先行”:在动物法教学中倡导图文视频

IF 0.3

Legal Education Review Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2984085

A. Timoshanko

{"title":"'Warning! Graphic Content Ahead': Advocating for Graphic Video in the Teaching of Animal Law","authors":"A. Timoshanko","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2984085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2984085","url":null,"abstract":"The educational benefits associated with the use of video in learning environments are well-known. For an animal law educator wanting to leverage these educational benefits, the use of video presents a dilemma. Much of the video relevant to animal law is confronting, distressing or difficult to watch, which may cause some students to experience a negative affective state. It is also largely unknown whether the educational benefits associated with non-graphic video continue to apply when the content is graphic in nature. This article aims to address this gap. It argues that student engagement, comprehension and knowledge acquisition, critical thinking skills, information retention and recall, and student interest can be improved with the use of graphic video. It also argues that educators have a role in shaping students’ values and opinions, and graphic video can help in this regard. To reduce the likelihood of students experiencing a negative affective state, five principles are presented which educators may employ when using graphic video. These five principles are then applied to a YouTube video depicting the surgical castration and tail docking of a piglet. By employing these principles, the risks associated with graphic video can be effectively managed while leveraging the educational benefits of video.","PeriodicalId":43058,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68459477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Teaching public law: Content, context and coherence 公法教学:内容、语境和连贯性

IF 0.3

Legal Education Review Pub Date : 2015-02-12 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2581360

Graeme Orr

{"title":"Teaching public law: Content, context and coherence","authors":"Graeme Orr","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2581360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2581360","url":null,"abstract":"Modern law owes its provenance and enforcement to one branch of government or another. But not all law is ‘public law’ simply because it emanates from public bodies, affects the public or serves public purposes. This paper begins by defining public law, compares its Australian, UK and US conceptions, and contrasts it with private law. It charts the conventional paradigm of public law as an umbrella sheltering constitutional and administrative law, built on the concept of government. This neat, if narrowing, idea of public law is reflected in the dominant themes in contemporary public law teaching and scholarship (such as accountability or representative democracy). Yet given the diversity of ideological and functional accounts of what government is ‘for’, public law lacks any unifying account. A descriptive definition based on the notion of government captures the core content of public law, but a normative smorgasbord lies at its heart. This creates challenges – both positive and negative – for teachers of public law. As a result, and alongside the decline in black letter teaching in favour of case-study approaches, thematic first level courses in ‘principles’ of Australian public law have flourished. To engage commencing students who are often civics-ignorant, the pedagogical response has been to draw on contemporary policy and politics to lend context to such courses in public law. However such a ‘magazine-y’ approach poses challenges for coherence.","PeriodicalId":43058,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2015-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68212698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

'Selling the Dream': Law School Branding and the Illusion of Choice “出售梦想”:法学院品牌与选择的幻觉

IF 0.3

Legal Education Review Pub Date : 2014-03-20 DOI: 10.22459/tgd.11.2015.10

M. Thornton, L. Shannon

引用次数: 15

A New Legal Ethics Education Paradigm: Culture and Values in International Arbitration 法律伦理教育新范式:国际仲裁中的文化与价值

IF 0.3

Legal Education Review Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI: 10.53300/001C.6270

Magdalene D'Silva

引用次数: 0

Connecting Research and Teaching: A Case Study from the School of Law, University of Canberra 连接研究与教学:堪培拉大学法学院的案例研究