2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy最新文献_第3页

Networks of Research Collaboration in China: Evidence from Nanotechnology Publication Activities, 1990-2006 中国的研究合作网络:来自纳米技术出版活动的证据，1990-2006

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472876

Li Tang, Philip Shapira

引用次数: 4

Normativity and Innovation: An Approach to Concepts of Innovation from the Perspective of Philosophy of Technology 规范与创新:从技术哲学的角度看创新概念

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472880

Jan C. Schmidt

引用次数: 5

Catching up, forging ahead, or falling behind? Central & Eastern European development from 1990 to 2005 追赶，前进，还是落后?1990年至2005年中欧和东欧的发展

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472897

M. Tiits, R. Kattel, Tarmo Kalvet, Dorel Tamm

引用次数: 4

The Role of Public R&D Laboratories in Innovation Networks: a Comparison between Canada and Mexico 公共研发实验室在创新网络中的作用:加拿大和墨西哥的比较

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472900

C. Díaz-Pérez, R. Arechavala-Vargas

{"title":"The Role of Public R&D Laboratories in Innovation Networks: a Comparison between Canada and Mexico","authors":"C. Díaz-Pérez, R. Arechavala-Vargas","doi":"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472900","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze those institutional arrangements that support the development of knowledge and innovation networks, particularly those that surround public R&D laboratories. Institutional arrangements include public policies as well as conditions that are necessary to build the proper kind of interactions among organizations. In Mexico, these processes are beginning to develop, in some cases with the support of regional-level policies. Internationally, different policy schemes have proven successful at the local and regional level. Policy development networks, where bottom-up and national and provincial directives interact, are being successfully implemented. In comparing the Mexican and Canadian experiences, some common characteristics can be identified that can lead to the development of adequate environments for innovation networks. Fieldwork reported here has consisted of organizational case studies of R&D laboratories in Mexico and Canada. These case studies include extensive documentation of organizational structure and practices, analysis of strategic planning documents and operating reports, as well as in-depth interviews with researchers, with higher management, and with representatives of organizations with which they interact. Interviews also include government agency officials and representatives of firms that have used or sought to use the laboratories' services. Networks studied include fuel cells technology, medical biotechnology, agro biotechnology, electro chemistry, metal mechanics and software industry, for example. The comparison of several innovation networks in Canada, which are more developed, with those that are beginning to develop in Mexico, enables the identification of viable alternatives for the design and implementation of policy initiatives for their development. Implications for further research and for policy design and implementation are discussed, particularly with respect to the role that R&D labs can play in policy implementation.","PeriodicalId":423894,"journal":{"name":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123837088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Nanodistricts in the United States: Metropolitan Trajectories and Clustering (December 2007) 美国的纳米区:都市轨迹和集群(2007年12月)

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472874

J. Youtie, P. Shapira

{"title":"Nanodistricts in the United States: Metropolitan Trajectories and Clustering (December 2007)","authors":"J. Youtie, P. Shapira","doi":"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472874","url":null,"abstract":"There are a number of theories that suggest emerging technologies will not be distributed equally across a region, rather they will be concentrated in certain locations. If this is the case, this distribution has implications for where future economic opportunities as well as future risks will be concentrated. In this paper, we probe nanotechnology (hereafter nano) research and commercialization at a regional level. The aim of this research is to examine the top 30 \"nanodistricts\" or metropolitan areas in the US with more than 1000 nanopublications in the 1990-2006 timeframe. We explore the factors underlying the emergence of these metropolitan areas into this top class through exploratory cluster analysis. We find that while most of the leading nanodistricts are similar to top cities in previous rounds of emerging technologies, there is also the surfacing of new geographic concentrations of nanotechnology research. Some of the latter types of nanodistricts are found in nontraditional places for new technology development that have large concentrations of research at a single government facility or university research institution. This finding suggests that concentrated investments in nanotechnology R&D into a single institution can elevate the profile of a region that has lacked previous technological prominence. However, questions are raised as to whether nanotechnology-related knowledge will be able to be exploited and commercialized in these new research locations.","PeriodicalId":423894,"journal":{"name":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132536445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Innovation indicators and policy - Some reflections on limitations and potentialities of innovation surveys 创新指标和政策——对创新调查的局限性和潜力的一些思考

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472881

E. B. Viotti

引用次数: 3

Attracting the R&D of Multinational Enterprises 吸引跨国企业研发

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472888

José Guimón

引用次数: 0

Multiple Pathways to Science and Engineering Employment: Characteristics of the U.S. S&E Workforce 科学和工程就业的多种途径:美国S&E劳动力的特征

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472909

N. Kannankutty

{"title":"Multiple Pathways to Science and Engineering Employment: Characteristics of the U.S. S&E Workforce","authors":"N. Kannankutty","doi":"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472909","url":null,"abstract":"Since the post-World War II era, the U.S. has experienced a period of rapid expansion in its higher education system as well as in the size of its workforce. During the 1950s and 1960s, the U.S. federal government put in place many programs that encouraged this growth. At the same time, administrative record-keeping was also put in place to manage the programs. Eventually, these administrative uses expanded to meet policy needs. This lead to the development of a series of institutional and demographic surveys on degree attainment in science and engineering (S&E), graduate enrollment in S&E, and on the S&E workforce. The combination of these data sources provides a rich and detailed picture of the movement of individuals through the U.S. educational system and into the workforce. In this paper, the major demographic, educational and employment characteristics of the U.S. science and engineering talent pool will be described. Institutional data will be used to focus on postsecondary enrollments and degree production in S&E, to lay the groundwork for the entry into the S&E pipeline. This will be followed by a broad description of the characteristics and trends of the S&E workforce. Standard educational or labor force characteristics will be used to describe the pipeline. Additionally, the very rich U.S. workforce data will be used to show the many pathways that S&E and non-S&E trained individuals take to enter and then move into the broader U.S. labor force.The examination of this data shows that there are multiple and parallel pathways that individuals go through to enter into their careers, and it is not possible to identify one, or even a small number of pathways, that can be seen as generalizable to a large population. Rather, what can be seen is that combinations of degrees (as a proxy for skills), lead to a very large variety of occupational outcomes, even in some areas that are not, on the surface, directly related to science and engineering.","PeriodicalId":423894,"journal":{"name":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131753979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Will There be an AQ Khan of Nanotechnology? Probing Models to Address the Potential International Security Threats of Nanotechnology 纳米技术会出现阿克汗吗?探索解决纳米技术潜在国际安全威胁的模型

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472875

M. Kosal

引用次数: 0

Testing Schumpeterian Hypothesis with Data from a Developing Country: R&D Investment and Size of Firms in Thailand 发展中国家数据对熊彼特假说的检验:泰国R&D投资与企业规模

2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472882

A. Supnithadnaporn, Taehyun Jung

引用次数: 5