中国的研究合作网络:来自纳米技术出版活动的证据,1990-2006

Li Tang, Philip Shapira
{"title":"中国的研究合作网络:来自纳米技术出版活动的证据,1990-2006","authors":"Li Tang, Philip Shapira","doi":"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article shows there has been exponential growth overall in nano publication in China, there has been only linear growth in international publication collaboration. Potential explanations for this include increased internal incentives for publication in China in WoS-listed journals and for Chinese researchers to return home. However, there are quality differences between articles by author and collaboration type. Statistical testing indicates that internationally collaborated articles, articles by scholars in Chinese Academy of Science or top 10 Chinese universities, and articles involved Hong Kong scholars are more likely published in journals with high impact factors (IF), and receive high citations. These findings help to highlight China's emerging strengths in nanotechnology and the role of network relations in underpinning these developments.","PeriodicalId":423894,"journal":{"name":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Networks of Research Collaboration in China: Evidence from Nanotechnology Publication Activities, 1990-2006\",\"authors\":\"Li Tang, Philip Shapira\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article shows there has been exponential growth overall in nano publication in China, there has been only linear growth in international publication collaboration. Potential explanations for this include increased internal incentives for publication in China in WoS-listed journals and for Chinese researchers to return home. However, there are quality differences between articles by author and collaboration type. Statistical testing indicates that internationally collaborated articles, articles by scholars in Chinese Academy of Science or top 10 Chinese universities, and articles involved Hong Kong scholars are more likely published in journals with high impact factors (IF), and receive high citations. These findings help to highlight China's emerging strengths in nanotechnology and the role of network relations in underpinning these developments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

文章表明,中国纳米论文发表总体呈指数级增长,国际论文发表合作仅呈线性增长。这种现象的潜在解释包括,在wos上市期刊上发表文章以及中国研究人员回国的内部激励增加。然而,根据作者和合作类型,文章的质量存在差异。统计检验表明,国际合作论文、中国科学院或中国排名前10的大学学者的论文以及香港学者参与的文章更有可能发表在高影响因子(IF)期刊上,获得高引用。这些发现有助于突出中国在纳米技术方面的新兴优势,以及网络关系在支撑这些发展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Networks of Research Collaboration in China: Evidence from Nanotechnology Publication Activities, 1990-2006
The article shows there has been exponential growth overall in nano publication in China, there has been only linear growth in international publication collaboration. Potential explanations for this include increased internal incentives for publication in China in WoS-listed journals and for Chinese researchers to return home. However, there are quality differences between articles by author and collaboration type. Statistical testing indicates that internationally collaborated articles, articles by scholars in Chinese Academy of Science or top 10 Chinese universities, and articles involved Hong Kong scholars are more likely published in journals with high impact factors (IF), and receive high citations. These findings help to highlight China's emerging strengths in nanotechnology and the role of network relations in underpinning these developments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信