Nanodistricts in the United States: Metropolitan Trajectories and Clustering (December 2007)

J. Youtie, P. Shapira
{"title":"Nanodistricts in the United States: Metropolitan Trajectories and Clustering (December 2007)","authors":"J. Youtie, P. Shapira","doi":"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are a number of theories that suggest emerging technologies will not be distributed equally across a region, rather they will be concentrated in certain locations. If this is the case, this distribution has implications for where future economic opportunities as well as future risks will be concentrated. In this paper, we probe nanotechnology (hereafter nano) research and commercialization at a regional level. The aim of this research is to examine the top 30 \"nanodistricts\" or metropolitan areas in the US with more than 1000 nanopublications in the 1990-2006 timeframe. We explore the factors underlying the emergence of these metropolitan areas into this top class through exploratory cluster analysis. We find that while most of the leading nanodistricts are similar to top cities in previous rounds of emerging technologies, there is also the surfacing of new geographic concentrations of nanotechnology research. Some of the latter types of nanodistricts are found in nontraditional places for new technology development that have large concentrations of research at a single government facility or university research institution. This finding suggests that concentrated investments in nanotechnology R&D into a single institution can elevate the profile of a region that has lacked previous technological prominence. However, questions are raised as to whether nanotechnology-related knowledge will be able to be exploited and commercialized in these new research locations.","PeriodicalId":423894,"journal":{"name":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are a number of theories that suggest emerging technologies will not be distributed equally across a region, rather they will be concentrated in certain locations. If this is the case, this distribution has implications for where future economic opportunities as well as future risks will be concentrated. In this paper, we probe nanotechnology (hereafter nano) research and commercialization at a regional level. The aim of this research is to examine the top 30 "nanodistricts" or metropolitan areas in the US with more than 1000 nanopublications in the 1990-2006 timeframe. We explore the factors underlying the emergence of these metropolitan areas into this top class through exploratory cluster analysis. We find that while most of the leading nanodistricts are similar to top cities in previous rounds of emerging technologies, there is also the surfacing of new geographic concentrations of nanotechnology research. Some of the latter types of nanodistricts are found in nontraditional places for new technology development that have large concentrations of research at a single government facility or university research institution. This finding suggests that concentrated investments in nanotechnology R&D into a single institution can elevate the profile of a region that has lacked previous technological prominence. However, questions are raised as to whether nanotechnology-related knowledge will be able to be exploited and commercialized in these new research locations.
美国的纳米区:都市轨迹和集群(2007年12月)
有许多理论认为,新兴技术不会在一个地区平均分布,而是会集中在某些地区。如果是这样的话,这种分布就意味着未来的经济机会和风险将集中在哪里。在本文中,我们探讨纳米技术(以下简称纳米)的研究和商业化在区域层面。这项研究的目的是检查在1990-2006年间发表了1000多篇纳米论文的美国前30个“纳米区”或大都市区。我们通过探索性聚类分析探讨了这些大都市区进入这一顶级类别的潜在因素。我们发现,虽然大多数领先的纳米区与前几轮新兴技术的顶级城市相似,但纳米技术研究也出现了新的地理集中。后一种类型的纳米区出现在用于新技术开发的非传统地方,这些地方的研究主要集中在一个政府机构或大学研究机构。这一发现表明,将纳米技术研发的投资集中到一个机构可以提升一个以前缺乏技术优势的地区的形象。然而,关于纳米技术相关的知识是否能够在这些新的研究地点被开发和商业化的问题被提出了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信