RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY最新文献_第8页

“Acquiring Thought and Language”: Toward Osip Mandelstam’s Philosophy of Creation “获得思想和语言”——论曼德尔施塔姆的创造哲学

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1928940

O. Zhukova

引用次数: 0

Osip Mandelstam: Music as Philosophy 奥西普·曼德尔施塔姆:音乐即哲学

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1928953

P. Volkova

引用次数: 0

Culture and Poetry: The Synchronic Imperative in Osip Mandelstam’s Work 文化与诗歌：奥斯普·曼德尔斯坦作品中的同步命令

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1928944

N. Khrenov

{"title":"Culture and Poetry: The Synchronic Imperative in Osip Mandelstam’s Work","authors":"N. Khrenov","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.1928944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1928944","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article attempts to understand not so much the poetic and stylistic features of Osip. E. Mandelstam’s poetics, which has been of great interest to philologists and thus sufficiently studied to date, as the philosophical–culturological aspects of his work. To fill this lacuna, it is vital that we compare Mandelstam’s poetic works with his prose, theory, criticism, and polemics. The poet’s statements in these genres largely clarify his attitude toward culture. In particular, this article examines the question of the poet’s interest in philosophy and the natural sciences, which is expressed both in his poems and in his attitude to culture. His publications on theory also shed light on his experiments in poetry. Drawing parallels between his contemporary culture and other cultures that exist or had existed in history, Mandelstam’s whimsical culturological associations avoid any detailed narrative development, highlighting only individual features and producing a number of apparently necessary details. This is precisely what testifies to the specific features of Mandelstam’s own poetry. Such a technique requires a sort of co-authorship and cocreation on the reader’s part, the very kind that a contemporary postmodernist aesthetic calls for. The present article also highlights the issue of theoretical and philosophical understanding of the poet’s Acmeism as an independent poetic system in relation to other artistic trends that existed in the first decades of the twentieth century, above all in relation to Symbolism and Futurism, which influenced Mandelstam’s own work.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"105 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45106412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Motifs of “the North” in Young Osip Mandelstam’s Philosophical–Poetic Works 青年奥西普·曼德尔施塔姆哲学诗歌作品中的“北方”母题

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1928951

A. Kara-Murza

引用次数: 1

Boris N. Chicherin and Karl Marx. A Confrontation of Ideas 鲍里斯·奇切林和卡尔·马克思。思想的交锋

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1909984

S. L. Chizhkov

引用次数: 0

An Attempt at Systematic Presentation of the History of Political Doctrines in Boris N. Chicherin’s Major Work 奇切林主要著作中政治学说史的系统呈现

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1909987

I. Evlampiev

{"title":"An Attempt at Systematic Presentation of the History of Political Doctrines in Boris N. Chicherin’s Major Work","authors":"I. Evlampiev","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.1909987","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909987","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the classification of political doctrines proposed by Boris N. Chicherin in his major work on the history of political thought. Chicherin uses two forms of systematization for political doctrines: in one, he draws attention to the main element used in explaining society (power, personal freedom, law, or the ideal goal of development); in the other, he refers to the initial level of explanation (rational principles, empirical facts, or a synthesis of the two). This article shows that, despite the great significance of Chicherin’s work in Russian philosophy, his proposed model does not correlate well with the real history of political thought and fails to provide an understanding of the general developmental logic of political ideas. The author demonstrates how a more accurate classification of types of political doctrines took shape in mainstream Russian philosophy, expressed in its final form by Semyon L. Frank in his book The Spiritual Foundations of Society. There are two false understandings of society: “singularism,” in which society is seen as an external combination of ontologically separate persons, and “universalism,” in which individuals are completely subordinated to a single national or universal spirit. Frank calls the accurate approach the “organic theory of society,” where the primary ontological unity of individuals is dialectically combined with their secondary, relative autonomy. This article shows that Chicherin’s main error in his philosophical analysis of society lies in rejecting this ontological unity of individuals as the basis of public life.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"67 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909987","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43612060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Boris N. Chicherin on Western Liberalism and Its Shortcomings 论西方自由主义及其缺陷

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1909983

I. Evlampiev

{"title":"Boris N. Chicherin on Western Liberalism and Its Shortcomings","authors":"I. Evlampiev","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.1909983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909983","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the criticisms that Chicherin directed at the classical Western liberalism that emerged from the works of John Locke, Claude-Adrien Helvétius, Baron d’Holbach, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the criticisms that can also be directed at modern Western liberalism. Following the early nineteenth-century German philosophers (Fichte, Hegel), Chicherin proves the falsity of liberalism’s philosophical foundations and, above all, the fallacy of its individualism. The latter assumes that the individual is not just independent of society and the state but also primary in relation to them, as well as a limited understanding of freedom that is reducible to an absence of external restrictions on human activity. As Chicherin shows, the stability of a state built on these principles can be ensured only by manipulating the consciousness of its citizens such that they are satisfied with their rulers. The Russian version of liberalism created by Chicherin and his followers is based on an understanding of the individual’s dependence on society’s spiritual wholeness, as well as on an understanding of freedom as man’s spiritual inner quality manifested primarily in his ability to create high culture. Russian liberalism views the state as a value equal to and complementary to the value of individual freedom, defining it as a way of organizing the life of a people that arises naturally in history and is independent of the will of individuals.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"13 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909983","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47652278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Boris N. Chicherin and Questions the Russian Revolution Had to Address 鲍里斯·奇切林与俄国革命必须解决的问题

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1909986

A. Kiryakin

{"title":"Boris N. Chicherin and Questions the Russian Revolution Had to Address","authors":"A. Kiryakin","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.1909986","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909986","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Russian peasant commune was an obstacle to the development of productive rural forces. According to Boris N. Chicherin, this problem should have resolved naturally and without any specific state measures, including resettlement policy, and at the peasants’ expense. Chicherin proposed resolving the labor question by encouraging workers to create mutual aid funds, charity, and private foundations. It turns out that the Russian philosopher was not sufficiently aware of the problem of the growth of and reasons for the labor movement in the Russian empire. Similarly, Chicherin suggested an ethical approach to the national question, primarily in relation to the Polish, Finnish, and Jewish peoples. He believed the inhabitants of a particular region should decide for themselves which state to consider their homeland. The Polish people deserved to be granted their freedom. As for the Jewish people, Chicherin proposed abolishing all discriminatory norms and practices, granting them all civil rights, and countering manifestations of anti-Semitism by the public and the state. Chicherin considered the question of Finland’s status within the Russian Empire one of allowing the region the highest possible autonomy. Based on the detailed analysis of the thinker’s ideas and theories, the article concludes that though we can recognize Chicherin’s approach to solving the national question as successful, his solutions to agrarian and labor problems would only have aggravated the situation.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"54 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909986","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47418272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Boris N. Chicherin and the Problem of the Political Identification of His Legacy 鲍里斯·n·奇切林及其遗产的政治认同问题

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1909982

S. L. Chizhkov

引用次数: 0

Boris N. Chicherin’s Doctrine of Property: Basic Ideas and Unique Features 鲍里斯·N·奇切林的财产主义：基本思想与独特特征

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2021.1909985

V. M. Lobeeva

引用次数: 0