RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY最新文献

Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future 俄罗斯哲学研究的终结：着眼未来

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2023.2184114

M. Bykova

引用次数: 0

The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience 形而上学之路：列夫·卡尔萨文的哲学经验

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2022.2155008

O. Zhukova

{"title":"The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience","authors":"O. Zhukova","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2022.2155008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2155008","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article dedicated to Lev P. Karsavin’s creative path, I focus mainly on the evolution of the thinker’s religious–philosophical ideas. I consider the reasons that prompted the professional historian to choose the path of a free philosopher, defending an argument about the interrelation of Karsavin’s historiosophical ideas and the key provisions of his metaphysics. The article assesses the philosopher’s legacy in the context of the problem of Russian religious metaphysics as an independent and significant intellectual tradition that has shaped Russian cultural history among other spiritual–intellectual practices. In denoting the perspective of Karsavin’s activity, the author suggests key tasks in studying the philosopher’s work. These include, on the one hand, revising the corpus of Karsavin studies, and on the other hand, polemicizing with already existing interpretations of his work in Karsavin studies both in Russia and abroad. This strategy allows the author to conduct reinterpretations of Karsavin’s personological, onto-epistemological, and cultural–historical understandings that constitute the theoretical core of his religious metaphysics.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"60 1","pages":"427 - 440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45773318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Lev P. Karsavin on the Phenomenology of Revolution 列夫·卡尔萨文论革命现象学

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2022.2155010

A. Dobrokhotov

{"title":"Lev P. Karsavin on the Phenomenology of Revolution","authors":"A. Dobrokhotov","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2022.2155010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2155010","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article attempts to analyze Karsavin’s theory of revolution in the broader context of a Russian metaphysics of revolution in order to determine the place of Karsavin’s phenomenology of revolution both in his work and within Eurasianist ideology. His article “Phenomenology of Revolution” ontologically links two key concepts within Karsavin’s understanding: the “symphonic person” and the “ruling stratum.” The meaning of revolution consists in leading the symphonic person to a realization of its main tasks, which require the utmost exertion and are related to the very existence of its historical form. This crisis can result in the person’s death, but in the death of the old person is born a new individuation of a higher order of personhood for whom that revolution has been a rebirth. If the symphonic person succeeds in “being revived through death or recovery,” then this will also be the birth of a new ruling stratum and a new government, that is, its new being as a state. Karsavin thus clarifies the historical functions both of the symphonic person and of the ruling stratum. The latter turns out to be a kind of entelechy of the symphonic person, providing its own personal content to the generic concept. The concept of the ruling stratum is explained in the metaphysical context of the symphonic-person theory. In light of the symphonic person’s mission, the ruling stratum is an organic connection among individuals of the active sociocultural segment of the population that has resonated with the spirit of history and the people. In this case, the stratum “rules” along with parties and institutions, eventually passing judgment on them. The main results of Karsavin’s work are (1) modeling a developmental phase of revolution and (2) the concept of the ruling stratum, which allows us to avoid formal sociological understanding of the active elite and direct our attention to the connection between personal activity and the “silent” but by no means “sleeping” substrate of the nation that manifests itself in critical epochs.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"60 1","pages":"452 - 461"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46503843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution 列夫·卡尔萨文:俄国宗教信仰与俄国革命

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2022.2155011

A. Kara-Murza

引用次数: 0

Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev P.Karsavin作品中的未来图像变体

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2022.2155015

I. Zheltikova

引用次数: 0

The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics 卡尔萨文《宗教形而上学》中的完美概念

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2022.2155013

O. Zhukova

{"title":"The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics","authors":"O. Zhukova","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2022.2155013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2155013","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the concept of the perfect, a key idea in Lev P. Karsavin’s metaphysics that largely determines his understanding of personhood and its ontological status. The associated concept of the perfect person develops throughout the entire philosophical period of the thinker’s work, from his Philosophy of History to his treatise “On Perfection,” written in the last year of his life in the Abez’ camps. In this article, I argue that the concept of perfection is the main structural element in Karsavin’s religious–philosophical system, making it ontologically full and complete. I believe the Christian idea of the perfection of man in God, philosophical variations of which Karsavin finds in Nicholas of Cusa’s system of total unity and Vladimir Solovyov’s idea of Godmanhood, is both the initial intellectual intuition and the ontological premise of the thinker’s metaphysical constructions. His religious–philosophical work has a continuity with Russian culture’s spiritual tradition, where patristic thought of man considers the ideal to be the spiritual transcendence of the person in his striving toward the Perfect God. This evangelic idea turns out to be the central binding element both of Karsavin’s Christian personology and of his metaphysics of history, which is resolved in a metaphysical vein.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"60 1","pages":"489 - 502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41908295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Seductions of Gnosticism: Lev Karsavin and Gnosis 诺斯替主义的诱惑：列夫·卡萨文与诺斯替

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2022.2155012

A. Kozyrev

{"title":"The Seductions of Gnosticism: Lev Karsavin and Gnosis","authors":"A. Kozyrev","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2022.2155012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2155012","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article looks at Lev P. Karsavin’s experience with the heritage of early Christian Gnosticism, from his attempts at stylization based on his study of genuine Gnostic texts and his systematic presentation of Gnostic systems in art almanacs published in the Soviet Union, to his perception of Gnosticism as a kind of “other principle” in his original religious–philosophical texts. We show that, following Silver-Age traditions, Karsavin uses myth as a form of philosophical thinking. He teeters on the edge of Gnosticism, applying certain Gnostic concepts, but he generally turns to Gnostic thought only to distinguish it from his own, which he presents as authentic to the Christian tradition. He criticizes both ontological and anthropological postulates of Gnosticism: the hierarchization of intradivine life, the introduction of the cosmic feminine into the bosom of the Divine, the interpretation of the Fall as the kenosis of God in time, and the explanation of the perfect God from the imperfect world, as well as the type of religious personhood that leads to a rupture in theory and personal faith. We examine Karsavin’s reception of Gnosticism against the background of interest in Gnosticism in post-revolutionary Russia, as expressed by Kropotkinite anarchists, A. Karelin, V. Murav’ev, Yu. Danzas, and M. Kuzmin.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"60 1","pages":"473 - 488"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46588810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Orthodoxy and the Soviet Regime: From Conflict to Adaptation 东正教与苏维埃政权:从冲突到适应

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2022.2144677

Alexei V. Makarkin

引用次数: 0

USSR: The Union of National Form and Socialist Content (Culture, Nation, Class) 苏联:民族形式与社会主义内容(文化、民族、阶级)的统一

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2022.2144676

I. Kalinin

{"title":"USSR: The Union of National Form and Socialist Content (Culture, Nation, Class)","authors":"I. Kalinin","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2022.2144676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2144676","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The subject of this article is the conceptual core of early Soviet cultural policy in the field of nation-building, as indicated by the well-known Stalinist formulation “socialist in content, national in form.” In addition to being well recognizable, there are several reason to address this phrase: 1) an interest in the Soviet regime’s language of self-description, which not only “conceals” real social practices from us, but also gives us access to them; 2) the opportunity to extend its descriptive power not only to the culture of socialist realism but also to the nature of production in the multinational socialist space; and 3) the formulation is not as vague and empty as it may seem, despite the manipulativeness so characteristic of the language of ideology that allows one to avoid any meaningful definition through multi-stage rhetorical moves. This article describes both the logical-rhetorical effects produced by the phrase and the sociocultural problems it was attempting to respond to. The main material for the present analysis is the work of Bolshevik leaders on the nationalities question and on issues of cultural construction. Its theoretical framework is contemporary research focused on the specific features of the Soviet multinational political project.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"60 1","pages":"382 - 394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42764678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

From Past to Future: The Soviet Union and the Russian Empire in Discourses of Rupture and Continuity 从过去到未来：断裂与连续话语中的苏联与俄罗斯帝国

IF 0.1 4区哲学

RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611967.2022.2144674

Alexei I. Miller, N. V. Trubnikova

{"title":"From Past to Future: The Soviet Union and the Russian Empire in Discourses of Rupture and Continuity","authors":"Alexei I. Miller, N. V. Trubnikova","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2022.2144674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2144674","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the still highly politicized question of rupture or continuity between the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, elements of continuity are not hard to find, nor should this be a surprise, since a new state arose in the same geographical space and made use of the economic, intellectual, and demographic resources inherited from the Russian Empire. At the same time, the Soviet Union could not have been more different than the Russian Empire. It rejected a number of key elements of the sociopolitical project that underlay the nationalizing tsarist empire and introduced radically new political and social principles for organizing that space. In particular, the Bolsheviks purposefully engaged in dismantling the tsarist efforts to build a great ethnic-Russian nation to stand at the center of the Russian Empire’s nationalities policy. The irreversible disintegration of post-Soviet space into separate nationalizing states became possible only toward the end of the twentieth century. At the same time, the imperial nature of the modern post-Soviet Russian core permits us to say that the imperial logic has survived. This is where we can find an element of inescapable continuity. We present studies of “continuities” and “ruptures” in modern academic discourse and in an updated format, gravitating toward “empirically nuanced” tools for analyzing multiple historical temporalities.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"60 1","pages":"369 - 381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46857612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0