{"title":"鲍里斯·奇切林和卡尔·马克思。思想的交锋","authors":"S. L. Chizhkov","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.1909984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyzes the fundamentally opposite positions of the liberal Boris N. Chicherin and the socialist Karl Marx on two fundamental issues where they engaged in polemics, albeit indirectly. The first part of the article examines the issue of the Russian rural commune, its present and future, and the place and rights of individuals in that community. Chicherin saw these communes as an institution of peasant enslavement and an obstacle to Russia’s development. Marx saw them as the most important resource for building socialism, as the main form of organizing agriculture via socialized land. The second part of the article analyzes Chicherin’s and Marx’s interpretations of dialectics and how these interpretations influenced their understandings of economic and social reality. The two interpretations of dialectics provide two fundamentally different pictures of capitalism and socialism, on individuality and personal freedom.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"28 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909984","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boris N. Chicherin and Karl Marx. A Confrontation of Ideas\",\"authors\":\"S. L. Chizhkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611967.2021.1909984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article analyzes the fundamentally opposite positions of the liberal Boris N. Chicherin and the socialist Karl Marx on two fundamental issues where they engaged in polemics, albeit indirectly. The first part of the article examines the issue of the Russian rural commune, its present and future, and the place and rights of individuals in that community. Chicherin saw these communes as an institution of peasant enslavement and an obstacle to Russia’s development. Marx saw them as the most important resource for building socialism, as the main form of organizing agriculture via socialized land. The second part of the article analyzes Chicherin’s and Marx’s interpretations of dialectics and how these interpretations influenced their understandings of economic and social reality. The two interpretations of dialectics provide two fundamentally different pictures of capitalism and socialism, on individuality and personal freedom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"28 - 42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909984\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909984\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1909984","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Boris N. Chicherin and Karl Marx. A Confrontation of Ideas
ABSTRACT This article analyzes the fundamentally opposite positions of the liberal Boris N. Chicherin and the socialist Karl Marx on two fundamental issues where they engaged in polemics, albeit indirectly. The first part of the article examines the issue of the Russian rural commune, its present and future, and the place and rights of individuals in that community. Chicherin saw these communes as an institution of peasant enslavement and an obstacle to Russia’s development. Marx saw them as the most important resource for building socialism, as the main form of organizing agriculture via socialized land. The second part of the article analyzes Chicherin’s and Marx’s interpretations of dialectics and how these interpretations influenced their understandings of economic and social reality. The two interpretations of dialectics provide two fundamentally different pictures of capitalism and socialism, on individuality and personal freedom.
期刊介绍:
Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.