Kompass Onkologie最新文献

{"title":"Geriatrisches Assessment: Warum es für die Therapieentscheidung so wichtig ist","authors":"A. Leischker","doi":"10.1159/000529745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529745","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer may suffer increased toxicity from intensive chemotherapy. Treatment individualization by geriatric assessment (GA) might improve functional outcome. Methods: We performed a multicenter, phase IV, open label trial in patients ≥70 years with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients underwent GA and were assigned to one of three categories based on their scores: Go-Go, Slow-Go, or Frail. These categories were intended to guide physician's treatment decisions when choosing to treat patients with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (arm A), gemcitabine (arm B), or best supportive care (arm C). Primary objective was a stable (loss of five points or less) Barthel's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score during chemotherapy; secondary endpoints included GA scores during therapy, safety, quality of life, response and survival rates. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the trial in six centers in Germany (out of 135 planned), resulting in termination due to low recruitment. Fifteen patients were allocated to nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, fifteen to gemcitabine, and two to best supportive care by their physicians, although according to their GA scores 29 patients (91%) were categorized as Slow-Go and three (9%) as Go-Go. Thus, fifteen of 32 (47%) patients were misclassified and given a course of treatment inconsistent with their GA scores. Median progression-free survival (PFS) were 3.3 months and 9.1 months and median time to quality-of-life deterioration 13 days and 29 days in the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy arms, respectively. Serious adverse events were reported in 11 (78.6%) patients in the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and 8 (53.3%) patients in the gemcitabine arm. Conclusions: Clinical evaluations by investigators differed markedly from geriatric assessments, leading to potential overtreatment. In our modest sample size study, those patients undergoing more intensive therapy had a less favorable course.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114694459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Eine einzigartige dreifache Philadelphia Chromosom-Variante t(4;9;22)(q21;q34;q11.2) bei einem neu diagnostizierten Patienten mit chronischer myeloischer Leukämie in chronischer Phase","authors":"Yuka Torii, Kana Nanjo, T. Toubai, M. Hosokawa, Ryo Sato, A. Yamada, Keiko Aizawa, M. Himuro, Satoshi Ito, Masakazu Yamamoto, J. Magenau, Ryan A Wilcox, K. Ishizawa","doi":"10.1159/000529714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529714","url":null,"abstract":"Hintergrund: Die chronische myeloische Leukämie ist eine hämatologische Malignität, die mit der Fusion von zwei Genen einhergeht: BCR und ABL1. Diese Fusion resultiert aus einer Translokation zwischen den Chromosomen 9 und 22, auch als Philadelphia Chromosom bekannt. Obwohl das Philadelphia-Chromosom bei mehr als 90% der Patienten mit chronischer myeloischer Leukämie vorhanden ist, weisen 5-8% der Patienten mit chronischer myeloischer Leukämie komplexe Translokationsvarianten auf. Wir berichten hier über einen Fall einer dreifachen Translokationsvariante bei chronischer myeloischer Leukämie in der chronischen Phase. Vorstellung des Falles: Bei einem 40-jährigen asiatischen Mann, der sich mit Leukozytose vorstellte, wurde eine chronische myeloischen Leukämie in chronischer Phase diagnostiziert. Die zytogenetische Karyotypisierungsanalyse ergab 46,XY,t(4;9;22)(q21;q34;q11.2). Er wurde behandelt mit Bosutinib und dann wegen Unverträglichkeit auf Dasatinib umgestellt, und nach 17 Monaten kontinuierlicher Behandlung wurde MR4,5 (BCR-ABL/ABL ≤ 0,0032%, internationale Skala) erreicht. Schlussfolgerung: Dies war der 14. Fall von t(4;9;22), im Speziellen einer neue Variante der Ph-Translokation, bei der das Chromosom 4q21 beteiligt ist, und der erste weltweit erfolgreiche Fall, der mit Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitoren behandelt wurde. Wir fassen frühere Fallberichte über die dreifache Chromosomenverschiebung t(4;9;22) zusammen und erörtern, wie diese seltene Verschiebung mit der Prognose zusammenhängt.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115606369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"CML: Therapiemöglichkeiten ab der Drittlinie werden erweitert","authors":"Fabian Lang","doi":"10.1159/000529747","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529747","url":null,"abstract":"Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) resistant/intolerant to ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are at high risk of experiencing poor outcomes because of disease biology and inadequate efficacy and/or safety of current therapies. Asciminib, a first-in-class BCR-ABL1 inhibitor Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP), has the potential to overcome resistance/intolerance to approved TKIs. In this phase 3, open-label study, patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs were randomized (2:1) to receive asciminib 40 mg twice daily vs bosutinib 500 mg once daily. Randomization was stratified by major cytogenetic response (MCyR) status at baseline. The primary objective was to compare the major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 24 for asciminib vs bosutinib. A total of 233 patients were randomized to asciminib (n = 157) or bosutinib (n = 76). Median follow-up was 14.9 months. The MMR rate at week 24 was 25.5% with asciminib and 13.2% with bosutinib. The difference in MMR rate between treatment arms, after adjusting for MCyR at baseline, was 12.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.19-22.30; 2-sided P = .029). Fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (50.6% vs 60.5%) and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (5.8% vs 21.1%) occurred with asciminib than with bosutinib. The study showed a superior efficacy of asciminib compared with that of bosutinib, together with a favorable safety profile. These results support the use of asciminib as a new therapy in patients with CML-CP who are resistant/intolerant to ≥2 prior TKIs. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03106779.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132857003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"STAS beim NSCLC: Risikomarker für Rezidiv und Prognose?","authors":"C. Schumann","doi":"10.1159/000529748","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529748","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) and bronchoscopic biopsy (BB) are widely used in the preoperative diagnosis of pulmonary nodules, but whether PNB or BB may cause tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) has not been reported. Methods: 433 postoperative patients with pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from January 2015 to December 2018 at our hospital were enrolled and divided into PNB group (n = 40), BB group (n = 48) and non-biopsy group (n = 345). The PNB and BB groups were matched using propensity score matched (PSM) separately from the non-biopsy group, after which the effects of PNB and BB on STAS, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: After PSM for 9 confounding factors (gender, age, smoking history, tumor site, scope of surgery, pathology type, stage, maximum tumor diameter and postoperative treatment), 38 cases in the PNB group were successfully matched with 38 cases in the non-biopsy group and 28 cases in the BB group were successfully matched with 28 cases in the non-biopsy group. After PSM, there was no significant difference in the incidence of STAS between the PNB and non-biopsy groups (42.1% vs. 34.2%, P > 0.05) and between the BB and non-biopsy groups (42.9% vs. 46.4%, P > 0.05). The results after PSM showed no significant effect of both PNB and BB on RFS and OS after radical surgery (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative biopsy in patients with stage I NSCLC has not been shown to increase the occurrence of STAS, nor postoperative recurrence and death.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"211 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133458013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Multiples Myelom: Korrelation zwischen minimaler Resterkrankung und progressionsfreiem Überleben","authors":"Marina Hajiyianni, H. Goldschmidt","doi":"10.1159/000529718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529718","url":null,"abstract":"In patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), daratumumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 44% in MAIA (daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone [D-Rd]) and 58% in ALCYONE (daratumumab/bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone [D-VMP]). Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a sensitive measure of disease and response to therapy. MRD-negativity status and durability were assessed in MAIA and ALCYONE. MRD assessments using next-generation sequencing (10-5) occurred for patients achieving complete response (CR) or better and after at least CR at 12, 18, 24, and 30 months from the first dose. Progression-free survival (PFS) by MRD status and sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥6 and ≥12 months were analyzed in the intent-to-treat population and among patients achieving at least CR. In MAIA (D-Rd, n = 368; lenalidomide and dexamethasone [Rd], n = 369) and ALCYONE (D-VMP, n = 350; bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone [VMP], n = 356), the median duration of follow-up was 36.4 and 40.1 months, respectively. MRD-negative status and sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥6 and ≥12 months were associated with improved PFS, regardless of treatment group. However, daratumumab-based therapy improved rates of MRD negativity lasting ≥6 months (D-Rd, 14.9% vs Rd, 4.3%; D-VMP, 15.7% vs VMP, 4.5%) and ≥12 months (D-Rd, 10.9% vs Rd, 2.4%; D-VMP, 14.0% vs VMP, 2.8%), both of which translated to improved PFS vs control groups. In a pooled analysis, patients who were MRD negative had improved PFS vs patients who were MRD positive. Patients with NDMM who achieved MRD-negative status or sustained MRD negativity had deep remission and improved clinical outcomes. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02252172 (MAIA) and #NCT02195479 (ALCYONE).","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126163472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Uveamelanom: Neue Therapieoption zugelassen","authors":"Kai-Christian Klespe","doi":"10.1159/000529755","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529755","url":null,"abstract":"In der IMCgp100-202 Studie wurden zuvor unbehandelte HLA-A*02:01-positive Patienten mit metastasiertem Aderhautmelanom im Verhältnis 2:1 nach dem Zufallsprinzip entweder mit Tebentafusp (Tebentafusp-Gruppe) oder einer Therapie nach Wahl des Prüfarztes mit Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab oder Dacarbazin (Kontrollgruppe) behandelt, stratifiziert nach dem Laktatdehydrogenase-Spiegel. Der primäre Endpunkt war das Gesamtüberleben. Die Gesamtüberlebensrate nach einem Jahr betrug 73% in der Tebentafusp-Gruppe und 59 %in der Kontrollgruppe (Hazard Ratio für Tod 0,51; 95% Konfidenzintervall [CI] 0,37 bis 0,71; P<0,001) in der Intention-to-Treat-Population. Das progressionsfreie Überleben war in der Tebentafusp-Gruppe ebenfalls signifikant höher als in der Kontrollgruppe (31% gegenüber 19% nach 6 Monaten; Hazard Ratio für Krankheitsprogression oder Tod, 0,73; 95% CI, 0,58 bis 0,94; P = 0,01). Die häufigsten behandlungsbedingten unerwünschten Ereignisse in der Tebentafusp-Gruppe waren zytokinvermittelte Ereignisse (aufgrund von T-Zell-Aktivierung) und hautbezogene Ereignisse (aufgrund von Glykoprotein-100-positiven Melanozyten), einschließlich Hautausschlag (83%), Pyrexie (76%) und Pruritus (69%). Die Häufigkeit und der Schweregrad dieser unerwünschten Ereignisse nahmen nach den ersten 3 oder 4 Dosen ab und führten nur in seltenen Fällen zum Abbruch der Studienbehandlung (2%). Es wurden keine behandlungsbedingten Todesfälle gemeldet.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128118643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Eine klinische Perspektive auf die Behandlung von chronischer myeloischer Leukämie in der chronischen Phase","authors":"Valentin García-Gutiérrez, Massimo Breccia, Elias Jabbour, Michael J. Mauro, Jorge E. Cortes","doi":"10.1159/000529704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529704","url":null,"abstract":"Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitoren (TKIs) haben die langfristigen Behandlungsergebnisse für Patienten mit chronischer myeloischer Leukämie (CML) erheblich verbessert. Nach Imatinib (einem TKI der ersten Generation) wurden TKIs der zweiten und dritten Generation entwickelt. Mit 5 TKIs, die auf BCR::ABL abzielen und in den meisten Ländern zugelassen sind (Imatinib, Dasatinib, Bosutinib, Nilotinib und Ponatinib), und der kürzlich erfolgten Zulassung von Asciminib in den USA sind die Behandlungsentscheidungen komplex und erfordern eine Bewertung patientenspezifischer Faktoren. Optimale Behandlungsstrategien für CML entwickeln sich weiter, wobei der Schwerpunkt verstärkt darauf liegt, ein tiefes molekulares Ansprechen zu erzielen. Anhand von klinisch relevanten Fallstudien, die von den Autoren dieses Reviews entwickelt wurden, diskutieren wir 3 Hauptszenarien aus der Perspektive internationaler Experten. Erstens untersucht dieser Übersichtsartikel patientenspezifische Merkmale, die die Entscheidungsfindung zwischen TKIs der ersten und zweiten Generation bei der Erstdiagnose von CML beeinflussen, einschließlich der Begleiterkrankungen des Patienten. Zweitens wird eine gründliche Bewertung der therapeutischen Optionen im Falle eines Versagens der Erstlinienbehandlung (wie in den Richtlinien des National Comprehensive Cancer Network und des European LeukemiaNet definiert) diskutiert, zusammen mit praktischen Erwägungen zur Überwachung des optimalen Ansprechens auf die TKI-Therapie. Drittens verdeutlicht diese Übersichtsarbeit die Erwägungen zum und die Bedeutung des Erreichen(s) einer behandlungsfreien Remission als Behandlungsziel. Aufgrund des Zeitpunkts der Erstellung befasst sich dieser Review auch mit den globalen Herausforderungen, denen Hämatologen bei der Behandlung von CML-Patienten während der COVID-19-Pandemie häufig gegenüberstehen. Da bei CML weiterhin neue Behandlungsansätze erforscht werden, erörtert diese Übersichtsarbeit schließlich auch das Aufkommen neuerer Therapien wie Asciminib. Dieser Artikel kann eine nützliche Referenz für Ärzte sein, die CML-Patienten mit TKI der zweiten Generation behandeln, und kann, da er sich auf die internationalen und persönlichen Erfahrungen der Ärzte konzentriert, einen Einblick in alternative, zuvor nicht in Betracht gezogene Ansätze geben.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116598103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Kolorektales Karzinom: Ist eine adjuvante Chemotherapie nach Lebermetastasenresektion sinnvoll?","authors":"K. Homayounfar","doi":"10.1159/000528212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528212","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy is controversial in liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine if adjuvant modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) is superior to hepatectomy alone for liver-only metastasis from CRC. Patients and Methods: In this phase II or III trial (JCOG0603), patients age 20-75 years with confirmed CRC and an unlimited number of liver metastatic lesions were randomly assigned to hepatectomy alone or 12 courses of adjuvant mFOLFOX6 after hepatectomy. The primary end point of phase III was disease-free survival (DFS) inintention-to-treat analysis. Results: Between March 2007 and January 2019, 300 patients were randomly assigned to hepatectomy alone (149 patients) or hepatectomy followed by chemotherapy (151 patients). At the third interim analysis of phase III with median follow-up of 53.6 months, the trial was terminated early according to the protocol because DFS was significantly longer in patients treated with hepatectomy followed by chemotherapy. With median follow-up of 59.2 months, the updated 5-year DFS was 38.7% (95% CI, 30.4 to 46.8) for hepatectomy alone compared with 49.8% (95% CI, 41.0 to 58.0) for chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.92; one-sided P=.006). However, the updated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 83.1% (95% CI, 74.9 to 88.9) with hepatectomy alone and 71.2% (95% CI, 61.7 to 78.8) with hepatectomy followed by chemotherapy. In the chemotherapy arm, the most common grade 3 or higher severe adverse event was neutropenia (50% of patients), followed by sensory neuropathy (10%) and allergic reaction (4%). One patient died of unknown cause after three courses of mFOLFOX6 administration. Conclusion: DFS did not correlate with OS for liver-only metastatic CRC. Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 improves DFS among patients treated with hepatectomy for CRC liver metastasis. It remains unclear whether chemotherapy improves OS.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122396649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"CAR-T-Zell-Therapie bei r/r DLBCL","authors":"","doi":"10.1159/000528399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528399","url":null,"abstract":"344 Patient*innen unterzogen sich der Leukapherese, von denen 269 Liso-Cel erhielten. Die empfohlene Ziel dosierung war 100 × 106 CAR-T-Zellen (die Dosis von 50–150 × 106 lebensfähigen CAR+ T-Zellen wurde in der Studie eingesetzt, der zugelassene Dosisbereich liegt jedoch bei 44–120 × 106 lebensfähigen CAR+ T-Zellen). Von den 256 Erkrankten, die in die Wirksamkeitsanalyse eingingen, erreichten 73% ein objektives Ansprechen. Darunter zeigten 53% ein komplettes Ansprechen (CR) (Tab. 2). Im Median erzielten die Betroffenen ein erstes Ansprechen nach 1 Monat. Ein objektives Ansprechen wurde in allen Subgruppen erreicht [3].","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"139 35","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113939796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"PharmaNews","authors":"","doi":"10.1159/000528324","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528324","url":null,"abstract":"© 2022 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg Verlag, Herausgeber, Redaktion und Verlagsgeschäftsführung übernehmen keine Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Rubrik. information@karger.com www.karger.com Inhibitoren der Bruton-Tyrosinkinase (BTKi) gehören bei der chronischen lymphatischen Leukämie (CLL) zum Therapiestandard [1]. Das Nebenwirkungsprofil des BTKi der 1. Generation kann jedoch therapielimitierend sein: In Real-World-Studien brachen 14−23% der Patient*innen die Behandlung mit Ibrutinib aufgrund unerwünschter Ereignisse ab [2–4]. In einem Interview mit Prof. Dr. med. Clemens Wendtner, Chefarzt der Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Immunologie, Palliativmedizin, Infektiolo gie und Tropenmedizin, München Klinik Schwabing, sprach er zum Stellenwert von Acalabrutinib (Calquence®), dem BTKi der 2. Generation, bei der Behandlung der CLL.","PeriodicalId":413988,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Onkologie","volume":"235 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132519355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}