发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Pulpit Polemics and ‘Damnable Doctrine’ in Early Modern Scotland 近代早期苏格兰的讲坛论战与“该死的教义”
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1821944
Russell Newton
{"title":"Pulpit Polemics and ‘Damnable Doctrine’ in Early Modern Scotland","authors":"Russell Newton","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1821944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1821944","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The First Book of Discipline (1560) established the confutation of erroneous doctrine as an integral aspect of Scottish ministers’ responsibilities in the pulpit. This article explores this key facet of early modern Scottish preaching. It begins by sketching out the main contours of polemical preaching, examining how Reformed Scots addressed theological ideas with which they disagreed (especially Catholicism). It then briefly outlines Scottish ministers’ engagement with antinomianism in the 1640s. Having laid this twin foundation, James Fergusson’s 1652 sermons against antinomianism are considered in detail. This article aims to shed light on how Scottish ministers used the pulpit to alert their hearers to, and gird them against, the dangers posed by often-subtle deviations from Reformed orthodoxy. It argues that preachers often provided their most forensic critique of doctrine when they were addressing theological errors that were considered to be spiritually dangerous but less familiar to their hearers.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"15 1","pages":"180 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87470907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defending the Trinity in the Reformed Palatinate: The Elohistae 在改革宗普法尔茨捍卫三位一体:神性论
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1843767
P. Reisner
{"title":"Defending the Trinity in the Reformed Palatinate: The Elohistae","authors":"P. Reisner","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1843767","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1843767","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"15 1","pages":"258 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87485626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Accuser of Brothers’: A Polish Anti-Demonological Tract and its Self-Defeating Rhetoric “控告兄弟”:波兰反魔鬼小册子及其自我挫败的修辞
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1812177
M. Ostling
{"title":"‘Accuser of Brothers’: A Polish Anti-Demonological Tract and its Self-Defeating Rhetoric","authors":"M. Ostling","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1812177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1812177","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Polish historiography has celebrated the Czarownica powołana [The Denounced Witch] without studying it very closely, treating its author as a heroic, skeptical, enlightened voice crying out against the witch-trials of Poland-Lithuania. But the anonymous author was probably a Jesuit priest, and indubitably was a fervent proponent for Counter-Reformation. Although the author does condemn the cruel treatment of accused witches, his critique is aimed to return witch-trials to ecclesiastical courts – a step toward reasserting Catholic jurisdiction over all spiritual matters, including Protestant ‘heresy.’ It is probable that the very strategy which made the Denounced Witch so popular among certain factions of the Catholic church hierarchy rendered it anathema to noble or burgher reformers interested in ameliorating the plight of accused witches.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"20 1","pages":"218 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89869182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Bible on the Shakespearean Stage. Cultures of Interpretation in Reformation England 莎士比亚舞台上的《圣经》。英国宗教改革时期的阐释文化
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1843765
A. Terlouw
{"title":"The Bible on the Shakespearean Stage. Cultures of Interpretation in Reformation England","authors":"A. Terlouw","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1843765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1843765","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"6 1","pages":"254 - 256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87154117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
James Dundas on John Cameron and Thomas Hobbes: Psychological Determinism and Compatibilism 詹姆斯·邓达斯评约翰·卡梅隆与托马斯·霍布斯:心理决定论与相容论
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1810863
Giovanni Gellera
{"title":"James Dundas on John Cameron and Thomas Hobbes: Psychological Determinism and Compatibilism","authors":"Giovanni Gellera","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1810863","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1810863","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Idea philosophiae moralis (1679) by James Dundas (c.1620–1679) is an unfinished manuscript in the tradition of Reformed scholasticism. There Dundas answers the challenge posed by Thomas Hobbes’s professed proximity with Protestant theology on the issues of psychological determinism and the compatibilism of freedom and necessity in human agency. Dundas endorses the theology of conversion of the Scottish theologian John Cameron, discussed at the Synod of Dort (1618–1619) and taught in the Scottish universities until at least the 1630s. With the theological apparatus of Cameron, Dundas construes a version of intellectual determinism and compatibilism which seeks to preserve the role of divine predetermination, omnipotence and foreknowledge while rejecting Hobbes’s materialistic psychology and causality. This peculiar ‘dialogue’ between Cameron and Hobbes also sheds new light on their reception in Scotland.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"36 1","pages":"201 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88652601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Why was Luther Hostile to Article 5 on Justification Agreed at the Religious Colloquy of Regensburg, 1541? 为什么路德在1541年雷根斯堡宗教会议上反对第5条关于正当理由的协议?
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1767326
A. Lane
{"title":"Why was Luther Hostile to Article 5 on Justification Agreed at the Religious Colloquy of Regensburg, 1541?","authors":"A. Lane","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1767326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1767326","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Martin Luther was negative towards Article 5 of the Regensburg Colloquy (1541), calling it an inconsistent patchwork. Yet a detailed comparison of the article with Luther’s own works shows that almost all that the article states can be supported by material from Luther himself. Why then was his attitude so negative? Luther mistakenly interpreted the statement that justifying faith is efficacious through love to mean that love has a role to play in ‘how we become righteous.’ This is clearly a misinterpretation, probably based on John Eck’s claims made at the colloquy. Luther probably also thought that Contarini and Gropper did not really accept the Protestant doctrine of justification because they did not accept its implications for doctrines like satisfaction, purgatory and the sacrifice of the Mass. This essay has an Appendix, of Article 5 in English translation.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"9 1","pages":"112 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78540873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Philip Melanchthon on Himself and His Books: The Preface to His Operum tomi quinque, 1541 菲利普·梅兰希顿谈他自己和他的书:《他的五代歌剧序言》，1541年
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1754592
Zachary Purvis, Casey B. Carmichael, Timios Cook
{"title":"Philip Melanchthon on Himself and His Books: The Preface to His Operum tomi quinque, 1541","authors":"Zachary Purvis, Casey B. Carmichael, Timios Cook","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1754592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1754592","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although Philip Melanchthon did not write his memoirs, he did reflect on his ‘life and times’ in a Latin preface he wrote to the first collected edition of his works, the Operum tomi quinque (1541), at the behest of the Basel printer Johannes Herwagen. The preface is highly significant for the reflections it contains on Melanchthon’s education, scholarship, and service to the Church. In particular, it offers special insight into the perennial debate over the Wittenberg professor concerning his humanism and its relation to the Reformation. Nearly all subsequent editions of Melanchthon’s works in the early modern period became implicated in some fashion in often bitter intra-Lutheran conflicts. The fact that this preface and the edition in which it appeared predates these conflicts is another reason to investigate it. The preface is offered here in English translation, with an introduction to the text and details concerning its printing.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"26 1","pages":"158 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81563688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
John Napier’s Influence on Seventeenth-Century Apocalyptic Thinking in England 约翰·纳皮尔对17世纪英国启示录思想的影响
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1759203
Alexander Corrigan
{"title":"John Napier’s Influence on Seventeenth-Century Apocalyptic Thinking in England","authors":"Alexander Corrigan","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1759203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1759203","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article considers the influence on English thinkers of a commentary (1593/4) on the Book of Revelation, A Plaine Discovery, by the Scot John Napier of Merchiston. The ways in which Napier’s system was amalgamated in an English context have not previously been explored systematically. The article employs case studies of works by several scholars, emphasising common themes to establish which of his conclusions were adopted or adapted by others, and which were rejected. It is focused on the first half of the seventeenth century, since Napier’s legacy is more evident before the restoration of the monarchy. The article shows that Napier’s chronological methodology and stance on the millennium were more influential than his contention that the world would soon end, illustrates the shifting reception of his work throughout the seventeenth century, and contends that English scholars tended to downplay their debt to Napier.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"1 1","pages":"126 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83183333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reformed and Lutheran Responses to Richard Baxter: Theological Heterodoxy and the Synod of Dort 改革宗与路德宗对理查德·巴克斯特的回应:神学异端与波特会议
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1760503
J. van de Kamp
{"title":"Reformed and Lutheran Responses to Richard Baxter: Theological Heterodoxy and the Synod of Dort","authors":"J. van de Kamp","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1760503","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1760503","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The English Reformed theologian Richard Baxter stated that he held a ‘middle way’ in the debate on soteriology within the Reformed persuasion, for which he drew on, among others, ‘all the Divines of Britain and Brem, in the Synod of Dort.’ This article will address the question of the extent to which the authority of the Canons of Dort played a role in the reception of his writings in the Netherlands and in Germany, among both Reformed and Lutheran readers. Whereas in the Netherlands some of Baxter’s works were criticized by theologians, in Germany far less criticism was evident, even by those who defended a particularist interpretation of the extent of the atonement. How can this difference be explained, and what role did the authority of Dort play in these responses?","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"59 1","pages":"148 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74056900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Irreparable Breach or Late-Medieval Reform? Luther’s Address to the Christian Nobility and the Conciliar Reform Tradition 不可挽回的裂痕还是中世纪晚期的改革?路德对基督教贵族的演说和大公会议改革传统
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2020.1767900
Richard J. Serina
{"title":"Irreparable Breach or Late-Medieval Reform? Luther’s Address to the Christian Nobility and the Conciliar Reform Tradition","authors":"Richard J. Serina","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1767900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1767900","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Martin Luther’s 1520 reform treatise, Address to the Christian Nobility, notably pleaded to secular authorities to help reform the German territorial churches of the Empire. Treatments of the Address, however, have neither explained adequately the source of Luther’s proposals nor taken into account recent scholarship on late-medieval conciliar reform and its aspirations to undertake wide-ranging disciplinary improvements. This study compares three specific reforms in Luther’s treatise (annates and services, Roman curia, and papal provisions and reservations) with their analogues at the councils of Constance (1414–1418) and Basel (1431–1449) to show the overlap between them. It will emerge that while Luther likely inherited the proposals from the German Gravamina, he was not aware of the conciliar reforms mediated through those Gravamina, or of the fact that the territorial authorities to which he appeals in his treatise were largely responsible for the failure of those conciliar efforts.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"36 1","pages":"111 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84701263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信