为什么路德在1541年雷根斯堡宗教会议上反对第5条关于正当理由的协议?

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
A. Lane
{"title":"为什么路德在1541年雷根斯堡宗教会议上反对第5条关于正当理由的协议?","authors":"A. Lane","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1767326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Martin Luther was negative towards Article 5 of the Regensburg Colloquy (1541), calling it an inconsistent patchwork. Yet a detailed comparison of the article with Luther’s own works shows that almost all that the article states can be supported by material from Luther himself. Why then was his attitude so negative? Luther mistakenly interpreted the statement that justifying faith is efficacious through love to mean that love has a role to play in ‘how we become righteous.’ This is clearly a misinterpretation, probably based on John Eck’s claims made at the colloquy. Luther probably also thought that Contarini and Gropper did not really accept the Protestant doctrine of justification because they did not accept its implications for doctrines like satisfaction, purgatory and the sacrifice of the Mass. This essay has an Appendix, of Article 5 in English translation.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"9 1","pages":"112 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why was Luther Hostile to Article 5 on Justification Agreed at the Religious Colloquy of Regensburg, 1541?\",\"authors\":\"A. Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14622459.2020.1767326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Martin Luther was negative towards Article 5 of the Regensburg Colloquy (1541), calling it an inconsistent patchwork. Yet a detailed comparison of the article with Luther’s own works shows that almost all that the article states can be supported by material from Luther himself. Why then was his attitude so negative? Luther mistakenly interpreted the statement that justifying faith is efficacious through love to mean that love has a role to play in ‘how we become righteous.’ This is clearly a misinterpretation, probably based on John Eck’s claims made at the colloquy. Luther probably also thought that Contarini and Gropper did not really accept the Protestant doctrine of justification because they did not accept its implications for doctrines like satisfaction, purgatory and the sacrifice of the Mass. This essay has an Appendix, of Article 5 in English translation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"112 - 125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1767326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1767326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马丁·路德对《雷根斯堡会谈》(1541)第5条持否定态度,称其为不一致的拼凑。然而,如果将这篇文章与路德自己的著作进行详细比较,就会发现,这篇文章所陈述的几乎所有内容都可以得到路德本人的材料的支持。那为什么他的态度如此消极呢?路德错误地解释说,通过爱证明信仰是有效的,这意味着爱在我们如何成为义的过程中扮演了一个角色。这显然是一种误解,可能是基于约翰·艾克在会谈中的说法。路德可能还认为,康塔里尼和格罗帕并没有真正接受新教的称义教义,因为他们不接受它对满足、炼狱和弥撒献祭等教义的影响。本文附有第5条的英译附录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why was Luther Hostile to Article 5 on Justification Agreed at the Religious Colloquy of Regensburg, 1541?
ABSTRACT Martin Luther was negative towards Article 5 of the Regensburg Colloquy (1541), calling it an inconsistent patchwork. Yet a detailed comparison of the article with Luther’s own works shows that almost all that the article states can be supported by material from Luther himself. Why then was his attitude so negative? Luther mistakenly interpreted the statement that justifying faith is efficacious through love to mean that love has a role to play in ‘how we become righteous.’ This is clearly a misinterpretation, probably based on John Eck’s claims made at the colloquy. Luther probably also thought that Contarini and Gropper did not really accept the Protestant doctrine of justification because they did not accept its implications for doctrines like satisfaction, purgatory and the sacrifice of the Mass. This essay has an Appendix, of Article 5 in English translation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信