James Dundas on John Cameron and Thomas Hobbes: Psychological Determinism and Compatibilism

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Giovanni Gellera
{"title":"James Dundas on John Cameron and Thomas Hobbes: Psychological Determinism and Compatibilism","authors":"Giovanni Gellera","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1810863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Idea philosophiae moralis (1679) by James Dundas (c.1620–1679) is an unfinished manuscript in the tradition of Reformed scholasticism. There Dundas answers the challenge posed by Thomas Hobbes’s professed proximity with Protestant theology on the issues of psychological determinism and the compatibilism of freedom and necessity in human agency. Dundas endorses the theology of conversion of the Scottish theologian John Cameron, discussed at the Synod of Dort (1618–1619) and taught in the Scottish universities until at least the 1630s. With the theological apparatus of Cameron, Dundas construes a version of intellectual determinism and compatibilism which seeks to preserve the role of divine predetermination, omnipotence and foreknowledge while rejecting Hobbes’s materialistic psychology and causality. This peculiar ‘dialogue’ between Cameron and Hobbes also sheds new light on their reception in Scotland.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"36 1","pages":"201 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1810863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Idea philosophiae moralis (1679) by James Dundas (c.1620–1679) is an unfinished manuscript in the tradition of Reformed scholasticism. There Dundas answers the challenge posed by Thomas Hobbes’s professed proximity with Protestant theology on the issues of psychological determinism and the compatibilism of freedom and necessity in human agency. Dundas endorses the theology of conversion of the Scottish theologian John Cameron, discussed at the Synod of Dort (1618–1619) and taught in the Scottish universities until at least the 1630s. With the theological apparatus of Cameron, Dundas construes a version of intellectual determinism and compatibilism which seeks to preserve the role of divine predetermination, omnipotence and foreknowledge while rejecting Hobbes’s materialistic psychology and causality. This peculiar ‘dialogue’ between Cameron and Hobbes also sheds new light on their reception in Scotland.
詹姆斯·邓达斯评约翰·卡梅隆与托马斯·霍布斯:心理决定论与相容论
詹姆斯·邓达斯(1620 - 1679)的《道德哲学理念》(1679)是一份未完成的改革宗经院哲学传统手稿。在这本书中,邓达斯回答了托马斯·霍布斯在心理决定论和人类能动性的自由与必然性的相容问题上与新教神学的接近所提出的挑战。邓达斯赞同苏格兰神学家约翰·卡梅伦(John Cameron)的皈依神学,该神学在多特主教会议(1618-1619)上被讨论过,并至少在1630年代之前一直在苏格兰大学任教。借助卡梅隆的神学工具,邓达斯解释了一种智力决定论和相容论,这种决定论和相容论试图保留神的预定,全能和预知的作用,同时拒绝霍布斯的唯物主义心理学和因果关系。卡梅伦和霍布斯之间这段奇特的“对话”也为他们在苏格兰受到的欢迎提供了新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信