{"title":"Irreparable Breach or Late-Medieval Reform? Luther’s Address to the Christian Nobility and the Conciliar Reform Tradition","authors":"Richard J. Serina","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1767900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Martin Luther’s 1520 reform treatise, Address to the Christian Nobility, notably pleaded to secular authorities to help reform the German territorial churches of the Empire. Treatments of the Address, however, have neither explained adequately the source of Luther’s proposals nor taken into account recent scholarship on late-medieval conciliar reform and its aspirations to undertake wide-ranging disciplinary improvements. This study compares three specific reforms in Luther’s treatise (annates and services, Roman curia, and papal provisions and reservations) with their analogues at the councils of Constance (1414–1418) and Basel (1431–1449) to show the overlap between them. It will emerge that while Luther likely inherited the proposals from the German Gravamina, he was not aware of the conciliar reforms mediated through those Gravamina, or of the fact that the territorial authorities to which he appeals in his treatise were largely responsible for the failure of those conciliar efforts.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"36 1","pages":"111 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1767900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Martin Luther’s 1520 reform treatise, Address to the Christian Nobility, notably pleaded to secular authorities to help reform the German territorial churches of the Empire. Treatments of the Address, however, have neither explained adequately the source of Luther’s proposals nor taken into account recent scholarship on late-medieval conciliar reform and its aspirations to undertake wide-ranging disciplinary improvements. This study compares three specific reforms in Luther’s treatise (annates and services, Roman curia, and papal provisions and reservations) with their analogues at the councils of Constance (1414–1418) and Basel (1431–1449) to show the overlap between them. It will emerge that while Luther likely inherited the proposals from the German Gravamina, he was not aware of the conciliar reforms mediated through those Gravamina, or of the fact that the territorial authorities to which he appeals in his treatise were largely responsible for the failure of those conciliar efforts.
马丁·路德在1520年的改革论著《致基督教贵族》(Address to the Christian Nobility)中,特别呼吁世俗当局帮助改革帝国的德意志领土教会。然而,对《讲话》的论述既没有充分解释路德建议的来源,也没有考虑到最近关于中世纪晚期大议会改革的学术研究及其进行广泛学科改进的愿望。本研究将路德论文中的三个具体改革(annates和services, Roman curia, and papal provisions and reservations)与他们在君士坦丁会议(1414-1418)和巴塞尔会议(1431-1449)上的类似改革进行了比较,以显示它们之间的重叠。我们会发现,虽然路德很可能继承了德国格拉瓦米纳的提议,但他并不知道格拉瓦米纳促成了大公会议的改革,也不知道他在论文中呼吁的地方当局对大公会议的失败负有很大责任。