发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Elenchos最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A proposito di Giovanni Filopono cristiano e gli studi di Étienne Évrard 约翰·菲洛蓬·克里斯蒂安与埃夫拉德研究
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0009
A. Longo
{"title":"A proposito di Giovanni Filopono cristiano e gli studi di Étienne Évrard","authors":"A. Longo","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The studies of É. Évrard, recently published by M.-A. Gavray (2020), are high quality works which allow to immerse oneself in the context of the Platonic-Aristotelian school of Alexandria in Egypt throughout the sixth century AD. They mostly focus on the figure and work of Joannes Philoponus, with specific attention to the compositional technique of his Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics and of On the Eternity of the World against Aristotle. Despite being strongly critical of the Stagirite on some points, also due to his Christian faith (as with regard to the eternity of the world, which he denies), Philoponus deeply assimilated Aristotelian methods, lexicon and concepts. He therefore uses this legacy in his commentary on the first chapter of the biblical text of the book of Genesis on the creation of the universe, of living species and of the human being (better known with the Latin title De opificio mundi). This work by Philoponus provides a first example of Christian Aristotelianism before the well-known one of the medieval Scholasticism.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"165 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43174877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antiochus of Ascalon’s ‘Platonic’ Ethics 阿斯卡隆的“柏拉图式”伦理学的安条克
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0005
F. Trabattoni
{"title":"Antiochus of Ascalon’s ‘Platonic’ Ethics","authors":"F. Trabattoni","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article focuses on the Platonic version of the doctrine of oikeiosis set forth by Piso in Cicero’s De finibus, Book V. The article aims to show that: 1) Cicero’s account, while clearly having Stoic features, is also consistent with the eudaemonistic character of Socrates’ and Plato’s ethics; 2) the replacement of oikeiosis with “assimilation to god”, attested in a passage of the Anonymous Commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus, derives from the intent to remove Epicurean egoistic connotations from Plato’s ethics; according to the Anonymous, the Stoic oikeiosis alone would not suffice to attain this purpose.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"85 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44465604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Götter als Seelen? Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis von Numenios, Fr. 30 des Places 神是灵魂吗?"帮助了解nmenoos，座标上的，30号
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0007
B. Krämer
{"title":"Götter als Seelen? Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis von Numenios, Fr. 30 des Places","authors":"B. Krämer","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present paper deals with a syntactic ambiguity in Numenius’ Fr. 30, 9 and proposes a new reading. According to most scholars, in this fragment Numenius tries to identify Egyptian gods and human souls descending into generation. Instead, I argue that, since theology and psychology are different topics in Fr. 3, Numenius is rather talking about the interrelation of gods and souls in the process of metempsychosis.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"139 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41569242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Severus on Tim. 30a: New Approaches and Perspectives. Porphyry, PM 87–95; Eusebius, PE 13.17 塞维鲁对蒂姆说。30a：新的方法和前景。波菲利，下午87-95；尤西比乌斯，PE 13.17
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0008
Alexandra Michalewski
{"title":"Severus on Tim. 30a: New Approaches and Perspectives. Porphyry, PM 87–95; Eusebius, PE 13.17","authors":"Alexandra Michalewski","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0008","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims at re-evaluating the significance of Peripatetic features in Severus’ exegesis of the Timaeus through a comparison between Severus’ doxography in the PM and the fragment of his treatise on the soul quoted by Eusebius. Indeed, until now, the scholarly literature has been inclined to consider Severus as a plain anti-Aristotelian and pro-Stoic Platonist. However the recent edition of the Porphyrian lost treatise On Principles and Matter allows us to grasp more clearly to what extant Severus’ view on the nature of the soul and on the bodily motion is grounded on an in-depth knowledge of the Peripatetic debates of his time.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"153 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47040669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Qui capite ipse sua in statuit uestigia sese. Lucrezio e lo scetticismo nel libro IV del De rerum natura 在这里你可以看到他的雕像。卢克雷齐奥和《自然》第四卷中的怀疑主义
Elenchos Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2021-0016
M. Corradi
{"title":"Qui capite ipse sua in statuit uestigia sese. Lucrezio e lo scetticismo nel libro IV del De rerum natura","authors":"M. Corradi","doi":"10.1515/elen-2021-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0016","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In his refutation of skepticism in book IV of De rerum natura (469–521), Lucretius uses argumentative methods typical of Epicurus: the περιτροπή is in many ways similar to that used by the philosopher in book XXV of Περὶ φύσεως, the same book where, in a passage dedicated to the criticism against determinists, can be found a reference to the criterion of the πρόληψις, that Lucretius exploits in his refutation. Moreover, Lucretius develops a strong demonstration concerning the irrefutability of αἴσθησις as a criterion of truth, which finds significant points of contact with a large fragment, transmitted by Diogenes Laertius (X 31–32) and generally traced back to the Canon of Epicurus. The last argument used by the poet is a pragmatic one: for the skeptic it would be impossible to live. The argument is similar to the praxis-based argument used by Epicurus in the Περὶ φύσεως against the partisans of determinism. But the pragmatic argument goes back to a very ancient layer of anti-skeptical polemics, even prior to Epicurus and already present in book Γ of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Although later influences cannot be excluded, Lucretius appears to be a faithful witness of Epicurus. Probably in a lost section of the Περὶ φύσεως, the philosopher of Samos showed positions going against skeptical or proto-skeptical attitude, contemporary or earlier to the time of the philosopher, probably developed in a Democritean or a Socratic context. Epicurus’ ad hominem strategy is very close to that of the philosopher in the Principal Doctrines XXIII–XXV, and certainly follows Aristotle’ strategy in book Γ of Metaphysics against those who deny the principle of non-contradiction. In a similar way, Epicurus does not have one figure as the objective of his refutation but constructs a hypothetical dialectical opponent capable of embodying a series of philosophical tendencies judged by the founder of Kepos to be extremely dangerous not only for the correct exercise of thought but for the human being’s life itself.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"42 1","pages":"291 - 319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41869318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dynamis. Sens et genèse de la notion aristotélicienne de puissance 经济,。亚里士多德权力概念的意义和起源
Elenchos Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2021-0020
F. Fronterotta
{"title":"Dynamis. Sens et genèse de la notion aristotélicienne de puissance","authors":"F. Fronterotta","doi":"10.1515/elen-2021-0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"42 1","pages":"397 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43897562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Method of Bifurcatory Division in Plato’s Sophist 柏拉图《诡辩家》中的分岔法
Elenchos Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2021-0014
Colin C. Smith
{"title":"The Method of Bifurcatory Division in Plato’s Sophist","authors":"Colin C. Smith","doi":"10.1515/elen-2021-0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0014","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The strange and challenging stretch of dialectic with which Plato’s Sophist begins and ends has confused and frustrated readers for generations, and despite receiving a fair amount of attention, there is no consensus regarding even basic issues concerning this method. Here I offer a new account of bifurcatory division as neither joke nor naïve method, but instead a valuable, propaedeutic method that Plato offers to us readers as a means of embarking upon the kind of mental gymnastics that will stretch us properly in preparation for further, more challenging dialectical work. Considering several interpretive issues, I argue that bifurcatory division is a process of collective inquiry into the common through which an account, both definitional and taxonomical, is discovered. Depending on the level of understanding exhibited by the inquirers, this account may or may not allow for noetic understanding of the object in the deepest sense.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"42 1","pages":"229 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44052553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Between Truth and Meaning. A Novel Interpretation of the Symploke in Plato’s Sophist 在真理和意义之间。柏拉图《诡辩家》交响的小说解读
Elenchos Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2021-0015
Lorenzo Giovannetti
{"title":"Between Truth and Meaning. A Novel Interpretation of the Symploke in Plato’s Sophist","authors":"Lorenzo Giovannetti","doi":"10.1515/elen-2021-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, I provide an interpretation of the symploke ton eidon at Soph. 259e. My goal is to show that the specific metaphysical view expressed by the interweaving of forms best accounts for Plato’s explanation of truth and falsehood. In the first section, I introduce the fundamentals of the interpretation of the greatest kinds and their functions. After that, I propose an interpretation of the assertion at 259e, the upshot of which is that the interweaving of forms only deals with extra-linguistic items, that it is related to both truth and meaning of linguistic items, in a very complex way which I aim to explain throughout the paper, and that it never involves sensible particulars. In the second section, I put forward my reading of the Stranger’s description of how logoi are structured and how they work. I pay particular attention to the view that words reveal being when they intertwine to form a statement. In the third section, I interpret the statements concerning Theaetetus. My goal is to advance a new reading of the specific role that kinds and their interweaving play with regard to the truth and falsehood of the statements concerning Theaetetus. The result is the very specific view that the kinds, which are the separated ontological cause of what happens in space and time, are the grounds of both the truth and the meaning of statements.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"42 1","pages":"261 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44137652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Two Theories of Natural Justice in Plato’s Gorgias 柏拉图《哥尔吉亚》中的两种自然正义理论
Elenchos Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2021-0013
L. Catana
{"title":"Two Theories of Natural Justice in Plato’s Gorgias","authors":"L. Catana","doi":"10.1515/elen-2021-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0013","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Plato’s Gorgias 482c4–484c3, Callicles advances a concept of natural justice: the laws of the polis must agree with nature, that is, human nature. Since human nature is characterised by its desire to get a greater share (pleon echein), nature itself makes it legitimate that stronger human beings get a greater share than weaker ones. Socrates objects: Callicles’ theoretical approach to civic life poses a threat to the polis’ community, its citizens, and to the friendship amongst its citizens. However, Socrates accepts Callicles’ premise, that the laws of the polis must agree with nature (again, human nature). Still, he disagrees with Callicles about the nature of human nature and proposes an alternative theory of human nature, eventually leading to his alternative concept of natural justice. The article explains the arguments underpinning these two concepts of natural justice, including the conflicting understandings of human nature.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"42 1","pages":"209 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41402695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
La sintassi del cosmo: osservazioni su un volume recente 宇宙的句法：对最近一卷的观察
Elenchos Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2021-0019
Michele Alessandrelli
{"title":"La sintassi del cosmo: osservazioni su un volume recente","authors":"Michele Alessandrelli","doi":"10.1515/elen-2021-0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0019","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This note does examine a recent volume by Ada Bronowski on the Stoic doctrine of the lekta (The Stoics on Lekta. All There Is to Say, OUP, 2019). The first part summarizes its content, while the second discusses some critical and controversial points, in particular the Platonic tenor of the interpretation of the Stoic lekta offered by the Author. This interpretation gives an extra-linguistic and realistic function to items that the Stoics cautiously left under-determined from the ontological point of view.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"42 1","pages":"375 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43673034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书