发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Elenchos最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Riddle of the Great-souled eiron. Virtue, Deception and Democracy in the Nicomachean Ethics 伟大灵魂之谜：尼各马可伦理学中的美德、欺骗和民主尼各马可伦理学》中的美德、欺骗与民主
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0011
Carlotta Voß
{"title":"The Riddle of the Great-souled eiron. Virtue, Deception and Democracy in the Nicomachean Ethics","authors":"Carlotta Voß","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0011","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aristotle’s use of the term ‘eironeia’ in the Nicomachean Ethics (NE) appears to be inconsistent: first, he attributes the attitude termed ‘eironeia’ to the great-souled man (megalopsychos), who is defined by his virtuousness, then he classifies ‘eironeia’ as one of the two vices which are central to his account of the virtue of truthfulness. Modern attempts to explain and to solve the “riddle of the great-souled eiron” have not been satisfying. This paper argues that the riddle results from Aristotle trying to reconcile aristocratic values with democratic reality. In the process, some insight will be gained on the concept of the megalopsychos in general, on Aristotle’s notion of the virtue of truthfulness and on his depiction of Socrates. Finally, it is argued that Aristotle’s use of the notion of ‘eironeia’ in the NE bears some resemblance to the use of the notion of ‘irony’ in modern political theory.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"73 ","pages":"201 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139250877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plotinus on the Daemon as the Soul’s Erotic Disposition towards the Good 普罗提诺论作为灵魂向善的情欲倾向的大魔王
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0016
Anna Corrias
{"title":"Plotinus on the Daemon as the Soul’s Erotic Disposition towards the Good","authors":"Anna Corrias","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0016","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The idea that the soul has a guardian daemon was a common topic among Platonists, informed by different readings of Plato, especially Symp. 202e and Resp. 620e. In his philosophically dense interpretation, Plotinus describes the daemon as the ‘pole of attraction’ or the erotic disposition that keeps the core of one’s personality directed towards the Good. In this way, the daemon promotes the soul’s ascent to higher levels of reality through a transition from unconsciousness into consciousness that, across different incarnations, will eventually flow into the disembodied self. In order to unpack this view, this article brings together Enn. III.4 and III.5 with Enn. VI.7, where Plotinus discusses the difference between soul (ψυχή) and the expressed principle (λόγος) belonging to soul. This difference if fundamental to fully understand the role of the guardian daemon in the soul’s πρόοδος and ἐπιστροφή.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"12 1","pages":"313 - 331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139251942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stoici e Peripatetici su agire, patire e movimento: la testimonianza di Simplicio 斯多葛派和佩里帕提亚派关于表演、苦难和运动：辛普利西奥的见证
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0017
G. Nastasi
{"title":"Stoici e Peripatetici su agire, patire e movimento: la testimonianza di Simplicio","authors":"G. Nastasi","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0017","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories contains the most extended testimony about the Stoic conception of acting (ποιεῖν) and undergoing (πάσχειν). Simplicius ascribed to the Stoics the idea that acting and undergoing are to be reduced to the movement. To this opinion Simplicius opposed the Aristotelian view according to which acting and undergoing are two different categories. In this paper I intend to outline the original Stoic position comparing the reportage of Simplicius with other Stoic sources. Later, I will deal with Boethus’ defense of the distinction between the categories of acting and undergoing. I will argue that Boethus directly reacted against the Stoic opinion reformulating it in Aristotelian language.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"41 1","pages":"333 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139252832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maria Carmen De Vita (a c. di): Giuliano Imperatore. Lettere e Discorsi 玛丽亚-卡门-德-维塔（编）：朱利安皇帝。书信和演讲
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0021
Marco Zambon
{"title":"Maria Carmen De Vita (a c. di): Giuliano Imperatore. Lettere e Discorsi","authors":"Marco Zambon","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"85 4","pages":"397 - 400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139250852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Christelle Veillard: Hécaton de Rhodes. Les Fragments Christelle Veillard：罗得岛的赫卡顿。片段
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0020
Francesca Alesse
{"title":"Christelle Veillard: Hécaton de Rhodes. Les Fragments","authors":"Francesca Alesse","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"30 5","pages":"391 - 395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139253300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lorenzo Giovannetti: Eidos and Dynamis: The Intertwinement of Being and Logos in Plato’s Thought 洛伦佐-乔凡内蒂Eidos and Dynamis：柏拉图思想中存在与逻各斯的交织
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0019
Doina Cristina Ionescu
{"title":"Lorenzo Giovannetti: Eidos and Dynamis: The Intertwinement of Being and Logos in Plato’s Thought","authors":"Doina Cristina Ionescu","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"1 1","pages":"385 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139253310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Le problème de la compréhension de la dualité de la téléologie d’Aristote comme « but » et « bénéficiaire » 理解亚里士多德目的论作为 "目标 "和 "受益者 "的双重性问题
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0012
Nélio Gilberto Dos Santos
{"title":"Le problème de la compréhension de la dualité de la téléologie d’Aristote comme « but » et « bénéficiaire »","authors":"Nélio Gilberto Dos Santos","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0012","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study intends to show that the usually given meaning of the teleological dualism τὸ οὗ/τὸ ᾧ of Aristotle’s De anima, understood as “an aim or goal” and “the beneficiary”, does not come from Aristotle, but from a controversial interpretation of the ancient commentators. It originates on the attempt of certain Peripatetics to appropriate the Stoic distinction between “happiness” and “the happy subject” designated as the σκοπός and the τέλος of moral action. After this historical accuracy, we will propose a different reading of the Aristotelian distinction according to the context of De anima as designating the tendency in the individual towards its preservation and use.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"32 2","pages":"219 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139252064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Providence et passions divines dans le stoïcisme : comment prémunir un dieu bienveillant contre la colère ? 斯多葛主义中的天意和神性：如何保护仁慈的神不怒？
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0013
Rodolphe Le Penru
{"title":"Providence et passions divines dans le stoïcisme : comment prémunir un dieu bienveillant contre la colère ?","authors":"Rodolphe Le Penru","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0013","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Against the Epicureans who conceive the gods as indifferent to make them inaccessible to anger, the Stoics assert that the god is incapable of anger due to his very benevolence. However, doesn’t the Stoic god’s concern for man threaten his impassivity and expose him to feel anger and passions? In this paper, I address, in a theological context, the classic ethical problem of the compatibility between the integrity of the individual and his concern for others. Several hypotheses are examined. Is divine benevolence merely a disposition to do good to human beings, devoid of any affection for them? If it is a feeling, is it an aspiration to the very exercise of the virtue of benevolence, rather than to the good of mankind in itself? Or could it be understood, in the context of the cosmic οἰκείωσις, as the god’s care for his own parts? Finally, should not we distinguish, in god’s philanthropy, between the φιλία he feels for the wise men and the ἔρως he feels for everyone else?","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"387 1","pages":"249 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139253293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zwei Prinzipienlehren aber nur ein Prinzip. Eudoros von Alexandrien und (neu-)pythagoreische Henologie 两种原理学说，但只有一种原理。亚历山大的欧德鲁斯和（新）毕达哥拉斯鸡学
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0014
Kasra Abdavi Azar
{"title":"Zwei Prinzipienlehren aber nur ein Prinzip. Eudoros von Alexandrien und (neu-)pythagoreische Henologie","authors":"Kasra Abdavi Azar","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0014","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract According to the prevalent scholarly opinion, Eudorus of Alexandria supposes two interrelated levels within the same metaphysical hierarchy: one transcendent principle (to hen) at the highest level and two opposing principles (monas and aoristos dyas) at the subjacent level. This paper presents an alternative interpretation, arguing that Eudorus’ report, in fact, involves two different explanations regarding the first principle(s): one strictly monistic and the other dualistic. Eudorus holds the former approach (the so-called highest teaching, which is particularly influenced by Platonic henotheism) to represent the pinnacle of Pythagorean metaphysics according to which the latter, secondary teaching ought to be construed. In the final analysis, interpreting dualism through the lens of henology results in a somewhat idiosyncratic yet Pythagoreanising account of a Monad and Dyad that are, if understood as principle, identical to the One.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"9 1","pages":"273 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139251534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Galen on the Stoic-Peripatetic Controversy about Mixtures: Qualities or Bodies? 盖伦论斯多葛派与柏拉图派关于混合物的争论：质还是体？
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0015
C. Mirrione
{"title":"Galen on the Stoic-Peripatetic Controversy about Mixtures: Qualities or Bodies?","authors":"C. Mirrione","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Galen’s elemental mixture of fire, air, water and earth (and of the corresponding primary qualities, hot, cold, dry and wet) is primarily a physical process, in which primary elements mix and give rise to all compounded physical bodies, inanimate and animate. As such, the concrete, physical process of mixture is an essential basis for a thorough understanding of Galen’s physical system. In this article I pursued a twofold aim. First, I showed Galen’s syncretic approach while expounding his theory of mixture (insofar as he attributes that theory equally to ‘Hippocrates’, Aristotle and the Stoics) and illustrated the reasons behind this approach. Second, and more importantly, I addressed Galen’s epistemological position concerning mixture’s constituents and answered the question of whether, according to Galen, are the qualities alone, conceived more Aristotelico as conceptually distinct from the body itself, to mix or if Galen viewed mixture, as the Stoics did, as a coextension of bodies. As we argue, Galen assigns the epistemological status of πιθανόν to the Aristotelian and Peripatetic doctrines. This indicates that, to a certain extent, he joins this historical debate and is more closely aligned with Aristotle and the Peripatetics than with the Stoics. By resorting to what is πιθανόν Galen obtains two results: (1) does not expose himself to accusations of dogmatism but, at the same time and in his method, enters the ongoing controversy about qualities and bodies without taking a definitive position, and (2) he preserves his syncretic theoretical structure which finds its linchpin in the defence of a medical-cum-philosophical continuism.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"17 10","pages":"295 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139254483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信