Galen on the Stoic-Peripatetic Controversy about Mixtures: Qualities or Bodies?

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1515/elen-2023-0015
C. Mirrione
{"title":"Galen on the Stoic-Peripatetic Controversy about Mixtures: Qualities or Bodies?","authors":"C. Mirrione","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Galen’s elemental mixture of fire, air, water and earth (and of the corresponding primary qualities, hot, cold, dry and wet) is primarily a physical process, in which primary elements mix and give rise to all compounded physical bodies, inanimate and animate. As such, the concrete, physical process of mixture is an essential basis for a thorough understanding of Galen’s physical system. In this article I pursued a twofold aim. First, I showed Galen’s syncretic approach while expounding his theory of mixture (insofar as he attributes that theory equally to ‘Hippocrates’, Aristotle and the Stoics) and illustrated the reasons behind this approach. Second, and more importantly, I addressed Galen’s epistemological position concerning mixture’s constituents and answered the question of whether, according to Galen, are the qualities alone, conceived more Aristotelico as conceptually distinct from the body itself, to mix or if Galen viewed mixture, as the Stoics did, as a coextension of bodies. As we argue, Galen assigns the epistemological status of πιθανόν to the Aristotelian and Peripatetic doctrines. This indicates that, to a certain extent, he joins this historical debate and is more closely aligned with Aristotle and the Peripatetics than with the Stoics. By resorting to what is πιθανόν Galen obtains two results: (1) does not expose himself to accusations of dogmatism but, at the same time and in his method, enters the ongoing controversy about qualities and bodies without taking a definitive position, and (2) he preserves his syncretic theoretical structure which finds its linchpin in the defence of a medical-cum-philosophical continuism.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"17 10","pages":"295 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elenchos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Galen’s elemental mixture of fire, air, water and earth (and of the corresponding primary qualities, hot, cold, dry and wet) is primarily a physical process, in which primary elements mix and give rise to all compounded physical bodies, inanimate and animate. As such, the concrete, physical process of mixture is an essential basis for a thorough understanding of Galen’s physical system. In this article I pursued a twofold aim. First, I showed Galen’s syncretic approach while expounding his theory of mixture (insofar as he attributes that theory equally to ‘Hippocrates’, Aristotle and the Stoics) and illustrated the reasons behind this approach. Second, and more importantly, I addressed Galen’s epistemological position concerning mixture’s constituents and answered the question of whether, according to Galen, are the qualities alone, conceived more Aristotelico as conceptually distinct from the body itself, to mix or if Galen viewed mixture, as the Stoics did, as a coextension of bodies. As we argue, Galen assigns the epistemological status of πιθανόν to the Aristotelian and Peripatetic doctrines. This indicates that, to a certain extent, he joins this historical debate and is more closely aligned with Aristotle and the Peripatetics than with the Stoics. By resorting to what is πιθανόν Galen obtains two results: (1) does not expose himself to accusations of dogmatism but, at the same time and in his method, enters the ongoing controversy about qualities and bodies without taking a definitive position, and (2) he preserves his syncretic theoretical structure which finds its linchpin in the defence of a medical-cum-philosophical continuism.
盖伦论斯多葛派与柏拉图派关于混合物的争论:质还是体?
摘要 盖伦的火、气、水、土(以及相应的热、冷、干、湿等主要性质)元素混合物主要是一个物理过程,在这个过程中,主要元素混合并产生所有无生命和有生命的复合物理体。因此,具体的物理混合过程是透彻理解盖伦物理体系的重要基础。在这篇文章中,我追求双重目标。首先,我展示了盖伦在阐述其混合理论时所采用的综合方法(因为他将该理论同样归功于 "希波克拉底"、亚里士多德和斯多葛派),并说明了这种方法背后的原因。其次,更重要的是,我论述了盖伦关于混合物成分的认识论立场,并回答了这样一个问题:根据盖伦的观点,究竟是亚里士多德认为在概念上有别于身体本身的特质本身可以混合,还是盖伦像斯多葛派那样将混合物视为身体的共同延伸。正如我们所论证的,盖伦将πιθανόν的认识论地位赋予了亚里士多德学说和彼岸学说。这表明,在某种程度上,他加入了这场历史性的辩论,与亚里士多德和佩里帕提亚派的关系比与斯多葛派的关系更为密切。通过诉诸πιθανόν,盖伦获得了两个结果:(1)他没有受到教条主义的指责,但同时以他的方法,在不采取明确立场的情况下参与了正在进行的关于品质和身体的争论;(2)他保留了他的综合理论结构,该结构的关键在于捍卫医学和哲学的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Elenchos
Elenchos Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信