ElenchosPub Date : 2022-11-17DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0015
S. I. S. Brumana
{"title":"Platonismo e aristotelismo nel Timaeus di Cicerone","authors":"S. I. S. Brumana","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cicero’s Timaeus legitimately stands as the first Latin exegesis of the Platonic dialogue. I shall deal with the interpretation of §§19–21, a passage that departs significantly from the Greek text in several respects. The aim of this paper is to explore the role Aristotelianism might have played in Cicero’s Timaeus. Among the points that support such an analysis is the mention of the Peripatetic Cratippus in the prologue. The interpretative scenario I suggest considers both Cratippus’ role and Antiochus’s philosophical system with its agreement between Platonism and Aristotelianism.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"249 - 278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41630621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ElenchosPub Date : 2022-11-17DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0014
Sergio Ariza
{"title":"Wisdom in Gorgias’ Encomium of Helen","authors":"Sergio Ariza","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0014","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper argues that the Encomium of Helen must be seen as a speech about the value and importance of wisdom in human life and not as much as one as about logos. Gorgias sustains his vision based on a certain intellectualism which reduces moral faults to intellectual errors. This intellectualist program comprises a rationalization of emotions and a commitment with a certain tradition that discriminates between a minority with knowledge and a majority with only opinion. The consequence for Helen is that she can be excused from her action at the expense of being reproached for her lack of wisdom and is thus relegated to the ignorant majority. Therefore, what is initially praise and an apology turns into severe blame. For this, I argue, the encomium can be qualified as an amusement (paignion). For the Encomium’s listeners the amusement becomes a challenge that demands they decipher the speech’s paradoxical character and appeal to their own wisdom to not be reproached like Helen. Thus the Encomium cannot be seen as a treaty nor as mere joke but rather as an intellectual agôn between the speech and the listener, which serves them “to arm the soul for contests of excellence”, as the epigram dedicated to Gorgias in Delfos says.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"229 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47702996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ElenchosPub Date : 2022-08-01DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0003
Danielle Vazquez
{"title":"Aristotle on Efficient and Final Causes in Plato","authors":"Danielle Vazquez","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Metaphysics A 6, Aristotle claims that Plato only recognises formal and material causes. Yet, in various dialogues, Plato seems to use and distinguish efficient and final causes too. Consequently, Harold Cherniss accuses Aristotle of being an unfair, forgetful, or careless reader of Plato. Since then, scholars have tried to defend Aristotle’s exegetical skills. I offer textual evidence and arguments to show that their efforts still fall short of the desired goal. I argue, instead, that we can reject Cherniss’ assertation by re-examining Aristotle’s exegetical and methodological assumptions.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"29 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44291606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ElenchosPub Date : 2022-08-01DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0012
Claudia Lo Casto
{"title":"Gretchen Reydams-Schils: Calcidius on Plato’s Timaeus. Greek Philosophy, Latin Reception and Christian Context","authors":"Claudia Lo Casto","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"193 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41848439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ElenchosPub Date : 2022-08-01DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0011
Francesca Calabi
{"title":"Ludovica De Luca: Il Dio architetto in Filone di Alessandria (De opificio mundi 17–20)","authors":"Francesca Calabi","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"185 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43238533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ElenchosPub Date : 2022-08-01DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0004
F. Farina
{"title":"Degrees of Culpability and Voluntary Actions: Eth. Eud. II 9 and Eth. Nic. V 8 on the Voluntary","authors":"F. Farina","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0004","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Eth. Nic. V 8, Aristotle provides a classification of damages an agent may do, establishing degrees of culpability. In doing so, Aristotle recalls what he said about voluntary and involuntary actions in the preceding books about voluntary and involuntary actions. In this paper, I defend the thesis according to which the Eudemian account on voluntariness is consistent with the classification of damages Aristotle provides in Eth. Nic. V 8, arguing that one of Aristotle’s concerns in dealing with voluntariness is the legal practices of his time, which we can regard as strongly linked to his discussion on moral responsibility. Thereby, I challenge David Charles’ view that the account of voluntariness featured in the book on justice differs both from the Nicomachean account and the Eudemian one.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"55 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44403597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ElenchosPub Date : 2022-08-01DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0006
Ludovica De Luca
{"title":"La materia e la creazione del mondo nel De opificio mundi di Filone di Alessandria","authors":"Ludovica De Luca","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Following the traces of some references to pre-existing matter in the Septuagint, the article analyses the interpretation of Gen 1, 2a in Philo of Alexandria’s De opificio mundi with a focus on his omission of the ἀκατασκεύαστος character of the earth. Philo’s interpretation is closely linked to his conception of emptiness and to his pioneering defence of a creation ex nihilo. In his cosmology, which is articulated as a dual interpretation of the Genesis and Plato’s Timaeus, the matter plays an essential role. Philo justifies its existence on Aristotelian-Stoic grounds, highlighting the process of gradual refinement whereby matter passes from being a rough ὕλη to being an elaborate type of οὐσία.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"105 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43333890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ElenchosPub Date : 2022-08-01DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0002
D. Campbell
{"title":"The Soul’s Tool: Plato on the Usefulness of the Body","authors":"D. Campbell","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0002","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper concerns Plato’s characterization of the body as the soul’s tool. I take perception as an example of the body’s usefulness. I explore the Timaeus’ view that perception provides us with models of orderliness. Then, I argue that perception of confusing sensible objects is necessary for our cognitive development too. Lastly, I consider the instrumentality relationship more generally and its place in Plato’s teleological worldview.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"7 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41741693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}