发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Elenchos最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Une citation littérale de Mélissos dans le Sophiste de Platon 梅利索斯在柏拉图的《智者》中的一段文字引用
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0007
N. Cordero
{"title":"Une citation littérale de Mélissos dans le Sophiste de Platon","authors":"N. Cordero","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Even if Plato never claimed to be a ‘historian of philosophy’, there are in his dialogues many references to previous philosophers. Apart from his works on the Sophists, which do not claim to faithfully expose the ‘philosophy’ of their authors, we find in Plato’s dialogues comments and sometimes quotations from the Presocratics, from Thales to Philolaos. In some cases, Plato adds the name of the quoted philosopher, but sometimes he leaves to the reader the task of finding out who the commented or quoted author is. This is the case with Melissos in a passage of the Sophist (244b), where his name is not quoted, but an anonymous monistic philosopher expounds a literal quotation of the philosopher: ἓν μόνον ἔστιν (fr. B 8.1 DK).","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"44 1","pages":"173 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41880530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
L’interprétation astrologique de la philosophie naturelle d’Aristote selon Alexandre d’Aphrodise et Bardesane le Syrien 根据阿芙罗狄丝的亚历山大和叙利亚的巴德桑对亚里士多德自然哲学的占星术解释
Elenchos Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2023-0005
Izabela Jurasz
{"title":"L’interprétation astrologique de la philosophie naturelle d’Aristote selon Alexandre d’Aphrodise et Bardesane le Syrien","authors":"Izabela Jurasz","doi":"10.1515/elen-2023-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2023-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The existence of common points between Alexander of Aphrodise and Bardaisan the Syrian has been pointed out on various occasions. However, this question has not been explored in depth. The article proposes to analyse the cosmological ideas of Alexander and Bardaisan. Because both authors are known for their anti-determinist and anti-astrological polemics, it is preferable to place this comparison in the context of the astrological interpretation of Aristotle’s natural philosophy. The article discusses the Aristotelianism of Bardaisan, who may be the first representative of the reception of this doctrine in Syriac.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"44 1","pages":"119 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45859826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reminiscenze di Aristotele, Metafisica IX 6.1048b18–35 in autori neoplatonici 亚里士多德，形而上学，IX 6.1048b18 - 35，新柏拉图作家
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0019
A. Linguiti
{"title":"Reminiscenze di Aristotele, Metafisica IX 6.1048b18–35 in autori neoplatonici","authors":"A. Linguiti","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0019","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Proclus’ Platonic Theology (V 17, 62. 22–63. 2) one can detect a clear recollection of the well-known and much discussed passage 1048b18–35 from Metaphysics IX 6. This passage is transmitted in only one branch of the manuscript tradition and some scholars maintain that it is not by Aristotle or that it does not belong to his Metaphysics. On the other hand, Proclus’ testimony, supported by other passages by Neo-Platonic authors, provides an argument for the original location of the discussed section in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"363 - 367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45370123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lucretius’ prolepsis
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0016
Chiara Rover
{"title":"Lucretius’ prolepsis","authors":"Chiara Rover","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0016","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to investigate the equivalent of Epicurus’ πρόληψις, the second criterion of the Epicurean Canonic (DL X 31 = fr. 35 Usener), in Lucretius’ De rerum natura (DRN). Taking stock of the several occurrences of the Latin terms notitia and notities in the six books of the poem, I show that Lucretius’ view about preconception remains faithful to Epicurus’ πρόληψις, and that the poet does not endorse a less empiricist position than his Master because of some influence of the Stoic ἔννοια. To this end, I will also briefly address an important case in which πρόληψις, albeit not clearly mentioned, plays an essential role, namely the prolepsis of the deity (DRN V 1169–1182). Finally, I explain how Lucretius can be of some help in grasping the controversial relationship between the criterion of πρόληψις and that of ἐπιβολὴ τῆς διανοίας (animi inectus/iactus), showing in which way the poet seems to consider the latter as a criterion of truth in its own right.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"279 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41868339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Christof Rapp and Oliver Primavesi: Aristotle’s De motu animalium. Symposium Aristotelicum 克里斯托夫·拉普和奥利弗·普里马维西：亚里士多德的动物论。亚里士多德研讨会
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0021
Diego Zucca
{"title":"Christof Rapp and Oliver Primavesi: Aristotle’s De motu animalium. Symposium Aristotelicum","authors":"Diego Zucca","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"377 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48776361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Putting Fragments in Their Places: The Lost Works by Empedocles 把碎片放回原处:恩培多克勒遗失的作品
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0013
C. Santaniello
{"title":"Putting Fragments in Their Places: The Lost Works by Empedocles","authors":"C. Santaniello","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0013","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The author deals with the lost works of Empedocles, an often neglected subject, in the frame of the discussion concerning the number of the poems and their main features. He reviews the traces of the Passage of Xerxes, of the Medical Discourse, and of the Proem to Apollo among the fragments and witnesses, taking his cue from textual aspects and dealing with the contents, the significance of each of these writings in Empedocles’ culture and thought and their multifarious relationships with his times. As to the Passage, he tries to reconcile the contrasting interpretations so far proposed (historical or religious poem). Concerning B111, the only relic from the Medical Discourse, he explains why its contents are incompatible with the Physical Poem and the Purifications. He analyzes the Proem to Apollo in several perspectives (text, witnesses, contents also from the epistemological point of view, literary genre). He assigns fragments 131–134 and 142 to the Proem, drawing one of his arguments from the comparison with the third Homeric Hymn to Apollo, and also suggesting a relationship with an intellectual cult of the sun. Formal features help to ascribe each fragment to the relevant poem. Close similarities between fragments do not necessarily mean that they come from the same writing: Empedocles is wont to allude to one poem of his while composing another. The author concludes that the striving for a reductio ad unum of the Acragantine’s output, also evident in the attempt by a number of scholars to make only one poem out of the Περὶ φύσεως and the Καθαρμοί, has often led researchers to take for granted that none of the fragments preserved might belong to the lost works.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"197 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42162999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
La critica sestana ai numeri pitagorici 勾股数的性批判
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0017
Flavia Palmieri
{"title":"La critica sestana ai numeri pitagorici","authors":"Flavia Palmieri","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0017","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article proposes a reconstruction of the Sextan critique against the Pythagorean conception of number as principle of all existing things. Taking into consideration all the parallel passages concerning the presentation and the polemic about the Pythagorean doctrine, the present article proposes a division of the sceptical critique into two sections, the first one presenting the Pythagorean reasons to consider the numbers as principle existing apart from numbered things, and the second one presenting the arguments that Sextus himself built against them. This paper will show that this structure is consistent with the sceptical method, which consists in pointing out the ἰσοσθένεια among different positions which leads to suspension of judgment. Regarding the Pythagorean doctrine that emerges from these passages, the present article discusses the way in which Sextus testified a juxtaposition between Pythagorean and Platonic doctrines, probably due to a Middle-Platonic or Neopythagorean elaboration, against which Sextus used Platonic concepts, adopting in original way arguments taken from the Parmenides and the Phaedo. Despite the ἐποχή about the nature of the number, this article will argue that Sextus did not avoid to use the number in practical daily life, in a way that is consistent with the sceptical practical criterion.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"315 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49590587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Criticism of the Stoic Theory of Perception: typos and typōsis 阿佛洛狄西亚的亚历山大对斯多葛派知觉理论的批判:错别字和typōsis
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0018
A. Hangai
{"title":"Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Criticism of the Stoic Theory of Perception: typos and typōsis","authors":"A. Hangai","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0018","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Stoics identified the phantasia with the impression (typos) in the soul, or the impressing process (typōsis). Alexander of Aphrodisias engages directly with this account at De anima 68.10–21, and argues against the applicability of the impression in a theory of perception in Mantissa 10, especially 133.25–134.23. I analyse Alexander’s polemic account at De anima 68.10–21, I demonstrate that it differs from Chrysippus’ criticism of Cleanthes (contrary to some commentators), and I show how it fits in the context of his argument. From this analysis it will emerge how Alexander uses Stoic ideas to form his Aristotelian account. Then, I show that Alexander, by taking ‘typos’ metaphorically, not only prefers the term ‘enkataleimma’ over ‘typos’ in his theory of phantasia, but he keeps the ‘typos’ terminology only to remain faithful to Aristotle’s use (contrary to some commentators).","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"339 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45611127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pierre-Marie Morel: Le plaisir et la nécessité. Philosophie naturelle et anthropologie chez Démocrite et Épicure 皮埃尔·玛丽·莫雷尔：快乐与必要。Democritus和Epicurus的自然哲学和人类学
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0022
F. Verde
{"title":"Pierre-Marie Morel: Le plaisir et la nécessité. Philosophie naturelle et anthropologie chez Démocrite et Épicure","authors":"F. Verde","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"385 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42509829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maxime Chapuis: Figures de la marginalité dans la pensée grecque. Autour de la tradition cynique 马克西姆·查普伊斯:希腊思想中的边缘人物。围绕着愤世嫉俗的传统
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0020
Donatella Izzo
{"title":"Maxime Chapuis: Figures de la marginalité dans la pensée grecque. Autour de la tradition cynique","authors":"Donatella Izzo","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"369 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44430405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书