Antiochus of Ascalon’s ‘Platonic’ Ethics

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Elenchos Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1515/elen-2022-0005
F. Trabattoni
{"title":"Antiochus of Ascalon’s ‘Platonic’ Ethics","authors":"F. Trabattoni","doi":"10.1515/elen-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article focuses on the Platonic version of the doctrine of oikeiosis set forth by Piso in Cicero’s De finibus, Book V. The article aims to show that: 1) Cicero’s account, while clearly having Stoic features, is also consistent with the eudaemonistic character of Socrates’ and Plato’s ethics; 2) the replacement of oikeiosis with “assimilation to god”, attested in a passage of the Anonymous Commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus, derives from the intent to remove Epicurean egoistic connotations from Plato’s ethics; according to the Anonymous, the Stoic oikeiosis alone would not suffice to attain this purpose.","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"43 1","pages":"85 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elenchos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article focuses on the Platonic version of the doctrine of oikeiosis set forth by Piso in Cicero’s De finibus, Book V. The article aims to show that: 1) Cicero’s account, while clearly having Stoic features, is also consistent with the eudaemonistic character of Socrates’ and Plato’s ethics; 2) the replacement of oikeiosis with “assimilation to god”, attested in a passage of the Anonymous Commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus, derives from the intent to remove Epicurean egoistic connotations from Plato’s ethics; according to the Anonymous, the Stoic oikeiosis alone would not suffice to attain this purpose.
阿斯卡隆的“柏拉图式”伦理学的安条克
摘要本文主要研究西塞罗《论终结》第五卷中皮索所阐述的柏拉图式的分众论。本文旨在表明:1)西塞罗的分众论虽然具有明显的斯多葛主义特征,但也与苏格拉底和柏拉图伦理学的幸福论特征相一致;(2)柏拉图的《泰阿泰德篇》的一段匿名评注证明,以“对神的同化”取代“同形”,是为了从柏拉图的伦理学中去除伊壁鸠鲁利己主义的内涵;根据匿名者的说法,单靠斯多葛派的同道主义不足以达到这一目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Elenchos
Elenchos Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书