Research Ethics最新文献_第3页

Opinions and attitudes of research ethics committees in Arab countries in the Middle East and North African region toward ethical issues involving biobank research 中东北非地区阿拉伯国家研究伦理委员会对涉及生物样本库研究的伦理问题的看法和态度

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231185510

Zeinab Mohammed, F. Abdelgawad, M. Ahram, M. E. Ibrahim, A. Elgamri, Ehsan B. Gamel, L. Adarmouch, K. Rhazi, S. Abd ElHafeez, H. Silverman

引用次数: 0

Agreement of farm animal behaviour and welfare studies with the ARRIVE Essential 10 农场动物行为和福利研究与抵达基本10的协议

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231183100

J. Calderón-Amor, Daniela Luna, T. Tadich

{"title":"Agreement of farm animal behaviour and welfare studies with the ARRIVE Essential 10","authors":"J. Calderón-Amor, Daniela Luna, T. Tadich","doi":"10.1177/17470161231183100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231183100","url":null,"abstract":"The inclusion of animals in research studies involves a great responsibility to ensure animal welfare within the relevant ethical and legal frameworks. This study aimed to review compliance with the ARRIVE Essential 10 requirements and the ethical oversight of animal behaviour and welfare studies in farm animals. Three journals and a total of 133 articles were reviewed for compliance with the ARRIVE Essential 10 items and criteria. Each article obtained a final score according to whether or not each criterion was met within each item. Likewise, ethical declaration in each article was recorded. Chi-square test and linear models were built to assess associations between the ethical statement presentation and the final ARRIVE Essential 10 score with the country, the species, and the journal. We found that 15% of the articles did not present an ethical statement. The journal with the highest impact factor and the countries of the Global South presented an ethical statement more frequently. Regarding the Essential 10, the item with the lowest agreement score was ‘Blinding’ and the one with the highest agreement was ‘Outcome Measures’. Also, significant differences were found between journals in terms of the Essential 10 score. Essential 10 provides relevant information that allows reviewers and readers to identify possible welfare risks and the validity of the results in animal welfare science publications.","PeriodicalId":38096,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":"31 1","pages":"373 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74741590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ethical standards for research on marine mammals 海洋哺乳动物研究的伦理标准

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231182066

V. Papastavrou, C. Ryan

{"title":"Ethical standards for research on marine mammals","authors":"V. Papastavrou, C. Ryan","doi":"10.1177/17470161231182066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231182066","url":null,"abstract":"Conducting marine mammal research can raise several important ethical issues. For example, the continuation of whaling for commercial purposes despite the international moratorium provides opportunities for scientists to obtain data and tissue samples. In 2021 we analysed 35 peer-reviewed papers reporting research based on collaborations with Icelandic whalers. Results highlighted little consideration or understanding of the legal and ethical issues associated with the deliberate killing of whales amongst those researchers, funding bodies, universities and journals involved. Ethical statements were rarely provided. Those that were written were incomplete. Whilst research using whaling data may seem acceptable to some, it often becomes hard to justify when subject to scrutiny by the media and the public. Thus, there is a particular danger of reputational harm for early career researchers who may become unwittingly involved in such activities. Here we also consider the broader variety of ethical issues raised by non-lethal research (both historical and recent) on marine mammals including tagging and biopsy. We discuss instances where study animals were harmed or even killed and where the public mistook tags for harpoons. Without clear guidelines, reviewers and journal editors are put in an impossible position when considering whether to reject papers on ethical grounds. We propose that for such studies, universities, funders, journals, and permit issuers must require ethical assessments and that journals more effectively implement their existing policies on publishing ethical statements. The professional marine mammal societies need to work together to produce modern ethical guidance. Such guidance should require transparency in the provenance of data and samples while including advice on law, welfare issues, involvement of local scientists, and offshoring. Furthermore, it should require appraisal of and justification for the absolute necessity of invasive procedures. As is already the case in biomedical disciplines, ethical statements should be required in marine mammal science.","PeriodicalId":38096,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":"18 1","pages":"390 - 408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84899526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Let’s do better: Improving research ethics knowledge, practice and systems of oversight 做得更好:完善科研伦理知识、实践和监管体系

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231183840

E. Dove, K. Chatfield

引用次数: 0

Who owns your consent? How REBs give away participants’ agency 谁拥有你的同意?reb如何放弃参与者的代理权

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231180829

Janice Aurini, V. Iafolla

引用次数: 0

Reshaping consent so we might improve participant choice (II) – helping people decide 重塑同意，这样我们就可以改善参与者的选择(二)——帮助人们做决定

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231176932

H. Davies, Rosie Munday, Maeve O’Reilly, Catriona Gilmour Hamilton, Arzhang Ardahan, S. Kolstoe, K. Gillies

引用次数: 0

Research ethics committee members’ perspectives on paediatric research: a qualitative interview study 研究伦理委员会成员对儿科研究的看法:一项定性访谈研究

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231179663

Kajsa Norberg Wieslander, A. Höglund, Sara Frygner-Holm, T. Godskesen

引用次数: 0

Afterlife: the post-research affect and effect of software 来世:软件的后研究影响和效果

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-06-10 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231178450

Nicolas E. Gold, Ian Lawson, N. Oxtoby

引用次数: 0

Deception and informed consent in studies with incognito simulated standardized patients: empirical experiences and a case study from South Africa 在模拟匿名标准化患者的研究中的欺骗和知情同意:经验经验和来自南非的案例研究

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231174734

B. Daniels, J. Boffa, A. Kwan, S. Moyo

{"title":"Deception and informed consent in studies with incognito simulated standardized patients: empirical experiences and a case study from South Africa","authors":"B. Daniels, J. Boffa, A. Kwan, S. Moyo","doi":"10.1177/17470161231174734","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231174734","url":null,"abstract":"Simulated standardized patients (SPs) are trained individuals who pose incognito as people seeking treatment in a health care setting. With the method’s increasing use and popularity, we propose some standards to adapt the method to contextual considerations of feasibility, and we discuss current issues with the SP method and the experience of consent and ethical research in international SP studies. Since a foundational discussion of the research ethics of the method was published in 2012, a growing number of studies have implemented this method to collect data on the quality of care in a variety of settings around the world. We draw from that experience to provide empirical foundations for a popular approach to ethical approval of such studies in the United States and Canada, which has been to obtain a waiver of informed consent from the health care providers who are the subjects of the research. However, the majority of studies to date have evaluated quality of care outside the U.S., requiring additional ethical consideration when partnering with international institutions. We discuss these considerations in the context of a case study from a completed SP study in South Africa, where informed consent is constitutionally protected.","PeriodicalId":38096,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":"177 1","pages":"341 - 359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74943045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Systemic disruptions: decolonizing indigenous research ethics using indigenous knowledges 系统性破坏:利用本土知识去殖民化本土研究伦理

IF 1.7

Research Ethics Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI: 10.1177/17470161231169205

C. Fournier, S. Stewart, Joshua Adams, Clayton Shirt, Esha Mahabir

引用次数: 1