发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Theoria, Beograd最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Life plans and life goals in philosophical practice 哲学实践中的人生计划和人生目标
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo2201151f
A. Fatic, Ivana Pericin
{"title":"Life plans and life goals in philosophical practice","authors":"A. Fatic, Ivana Pericin","doi":"10.2298/theo2201151f","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2201151f","url":null,"abstract":"Amid the ongoing and growing rise in the awareness of traditional schools of\u0000 psychotherapy of the need for a more philosophical understanding of\u0000 themselves and their clients, and the resulting return of the fragmented\u0000 modern psychotherapy under the integrative aegis of philosophical practice\u0000 (philotherapy), some of the ancient, practical philosophical issues have\u0000 resurfaced with force in therapeutic practice. One is the issue of drawing\u0000 an appropriate distinction between the concepts of life plan and life goals.\u0000 The ancient philosophical figures tended to call the former ?reason?, or\u0000 ?wisdom?. The modern age has reactualized this distinction due to\u0000 exceptionally forceful social and technological influences, many of which\u0000 have caused large numbers of individuals to adopt life goals which, while\u0000 socially highly desirable, in fact work against the implementation of their\u0000 more authentic life plans. The outcome of this uncritical adoption of what\u0000 seems as a thrilling and satisfying structure of life goals, while at the\u0000 same time betraying one?s deeper life plan, or life strategy, is failure to\u0000 achieve a high quality of life, or ?the good life?.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128793077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Creative truth of emotions 情感的创造性真理
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo2203141s
Srdjan Sarovic
{"title":"Creative truth of emotions","authors":"Srdjan Sarovic","doi":"10.2298/theo2203141s","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2203141s","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is about immediate experience of vivid emotions which come to be\u0000 within the artist-artwork-recipient relations, where the artwork is the\u0000 point of ?embrace?. I will address the topic from the perspective of the\u0000 personal experience and artistic practice, which reveals the nature of\u0000 aesthetic emotions as the one of creation. Emotions induced and made alive\u0000 through the artwork are ways and modes of participation in its originative\u0000 truth; they are anything but mere mental events, or an expression of the\u0000 needs of the audience. Therefore, the creative truth of emotions belongs to\u0000 the artwork. Their and the origin of the artwork is one and the same, and it\u0000 is independent of the artist. Emotions related to the artwork are creative\u0000 because of their origin: if the emotions are separated from the creation and\u0000 artist, if they are reflections of the audience?s projections or if they are\u0000 products of the governing culture system, they are false.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127456035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Skepticism about reasons fundamentalism 怀疑的理由原教旨主义
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo1902153d
Aleksandar Dobrijević
{"title":"Skepticism about reasons fundamentalism","authors":"Aleksandar Dobrijević","doi":"10.2298/theo1902153d","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo1902153d","url":null,"abstract":"?Reasons fundamentalists? argue that the normativity of the reasons cannot be\u0000 explained in terms of other normative concepts, and this claim is most\u0000 closely related to the dogma that the reasons are the only fundamental\u0000 elements of the normative domain. ?Ought fundamentalists? claim, however,\u0000 that it is possible to show that the concept of ?ought? is the only\u0000 foundation of normativity. There is doubt as to the exclusivity of both of\u0000 these views.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133780315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heidegger on Klee: New perspectives of Heidegger’s philosophy of art 海德格尔论克利:海德格尔艺术哲学的新视角
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo1902035p
Una Popović
{"title":"Heidegger on Klee: New perspectives of Heidegger’s philosophy of art","authors":"Una Popović","doi":"10.2298/theo1902035p","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo1902035p","url":null,"abstract":"The main focus of this paper is Heidegger?s interpretation of Klee?s\u0000 painting. I am aiming to show that the interpretation of Klee has\u0000 radicalized earlier Heidegger?s understanding of art, so that now painting\u0000 is an alternative to poetry in the context of Heidegger?s philosophy of art.\u0000 This will be exemplified by a comparative analysis of Heidegger?s views on\u0000 painting and poetry, with regard to the possibility that art can be an\u0000 instigation for the change in the philosophy itself; the overcoming of an\u0000 image will be our special focus. Analysis will show that the interpretation\u0000 of Klee allows for a further radicalization of Heidegger?s philosophy of\u0000 art, such that would introduce the overcoming of the art itself.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130640458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hartmann′s aesthetics of the sublime in arts 哈特曼的艺术崇高美学
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo2102099g
Nebojša Grubor
{"title":"Hartmann′s aesthetics of the sublime in arts","authors":"Nebojša Grubor","doi":"10.2298/theo2102099g","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2102099g","url":null,"abstract":"The text discusses the place of the sublime in the organization of the strata\u0000 of arts, the phenomenon on periphery of the sublime and phenomenon in\u0000 opposition to the sublime. The result of the research is that beauty in a\u0000 broader aesthetic sense is not only formally and indifferently superior to\u0000 the sublime and other main aesthetic categories, but that the sublime\u0000 together with opposite phenomenon of charming limits the aesthetic dimension\u0000 within which artistically formed beauty appears in an aesthetically narrower\u0000 meaning.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132980236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Movement, perpetual progress and straining according to St. Gregory of Nyssa 运动，永恒的进步和紧张根据圣格雷戈里的尼萨
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo2102005d
Aleksandar Djakovac
{"title":"Movement, perpetual progress and straining according to St. Gregory of Nyssa","authors":"Aleksandar Djakovac","doi":"10.2298/theo2102005d","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2102005d","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we will explore how and on what basis the idea of progression\u0000 underwent its transformation in Neoplatonism and Christian theology. We will\u0000 show that the elements of this idea appear in Plotinus and some patristic\u0000 authors, but that it was finally shaped and elaborated primarily in the work\u0000 of St. Gregory of Nyssa, which is recognized as the most deserving for its\u0000 postulation.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":" 71","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132040011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Philosophers Bozidar Knezevic and Branislav Petronijevic: Between myth and reality 哲学家Bozidar Knezevic和Branislav petronjevic:在神话与现实之间
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo2203039m
B. Milosavljevic
{"title":"Philosophers Bozidar Knezevic and Branislav Petronijevic: Between myth and reality","authors":"B. Milosavljevic","doi":"10.2298/theo2203039m","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2203039m","url":null,"abstract":"In literature on Serbian history of philosophy it is quite usual to find a\u0000 statement that Branislav Petronijevic (1875-1954), professor of philosophy\u0000 at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy thwarted the efforts of the\u0000 philosopher and historian Bozidar Knezevic (1862-1905) to become a professor\u0000 at the same Faculty. It is said that Petronijevic wrote a negative official\u0000 review on Knezevic?s book Principles of History. The story fits well with\u0000 the negative myth of Petronijevic. To establish the facts it is important to\u0000 take into account the chronology, archival materials, memoirs and other\u0000 historical sources. When Knezevic applied for the position of a professor of\u0000 general history at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy Petronijevic was a 21\u0000 years old student at the University of Leipzig (1897). Ljubomir Nedic, then\u0000 a professor of philosophy at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy, recommended\u0000 publishing Knezevic?s first volume of Principles of History (1898). In the\u0000 meantime Knezevic did not apply for the position of a professor of History\u0000 of Philosophy and Ethics (February, 1898). Petronijevic did not write an\u0000 official review on Knezevic?s manuscript, but a review of an already\u0000 published book (September, 1898). The Principal educational council of the\u0000 Ministry of Education of the Kingdom of Serbia asked Nedic to write an\u0000 official review of the manuscript of the second volume of Knezevic?s\u0000 Principle of History (1899). Since Nedic couldn?t accept it, the newly\u0000 elected professor Petronijevic wrote a review of Knezevic?s new manuscript.\u0000 Although critical and analytical, the review was positive and the book was\u0000 published (1901).","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132324562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Third man argument 第三人论证
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo0604051z
Andrej Zarevic
{"title":"Third man argument","authors":"Andrej Zarevic","doi":"10.2298/theo0604051z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo0604051z","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to discuss one possible interpretation of Plato's Third Man argument. Plato's theory has been outlined by focusing on those premises usually taken as important for the formulation of the argument. The argument is then brought into connection with the theory of types although it is not assumed that self-predictional sentences in Plato's theory have the same role as in Russell's paradox. Employing the notion of \"well-defined class\", it is pointed out in what respect the argumentation is invalid, i.e. why Plato's theory of ideas needs not to lead to an infinite regress or a paradox of self-predication.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131604145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Jacques Derrida and the question what is theory? 雅克·德里达的问题，什么是理论?
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo2204137m
Vera Mevorah
{"title":"Jacques Derrida and the question what is theory?","authors":"Vera Mevorah","doi":"10.2298/theo2204137m","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2204137m","url":null,"abstract":"Misko Suvakovic states that ?Theory or theorization are hybrid genres or\u0000 polygenres that developed in parallel in artistic, activist and academic\u0000 circles (France, Great Britain, USA, Eastern Europe) by criticizing\u0000 autonomous canonical models and institutions of scientific and philosophical\u0000 work in society, culture and art? (Suvakovic 2008). In this paper, I will\u0000 look at the question ?What is theory?? by reading the works of Jacques\u0000 Derrida, Paul de Man and Richard Rorty and starting from the above-mentioned\u0000 framework of ?theory? defined primarily as a school of thought practiced\u0000 today dominantly in the academic sphere in the USA. For Derrida, the\u0000 question ?what is?? is at the basis of all other questions, especially those\u0000 that govern (governmentality) our understanding of the world, such as\u0000 questions of truth, consciousness, and subjectivity. These questions have\u0000 been considered in philosophy in different ways, but the one that is most\u0000 significant for my topic is the relationship of presence/absence, internal/\u0000 external, physis/mimesis viewed through the concept of writing.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114063040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The epistemic role of fiction in scientific models 小说在科学模型中的认知作用
Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/theo2003005k
Ana Katić
{"title":"The epistemic role of fiction in scientific models","authors":"Ana Katić","doi":"10.2298/theo2003005k","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2003005k","url":null,"abstract":"Giere?s analysis of the epistemic role of fiction in science and literature\u0000 is the representative of antifictionists. Our research finds the three\u0000 inconsistencies in his main paper regarding the comparison of fiction in\u0000 scientific models and literary works. We analyze his argument and offer our\u0000 solution to the issue favoring the perspective of fictionalism. Further, we\u0000 support a typological differentiation of false representation in science\u0000 into fictional and fictitious. The value of this differentiation we\u0000 demonstrate by giving the example of digital organisms in system biology.\u0000 The paper aims to help better understanding of fiction in science and to\u0000 avoid the oversimplification of literary fiction.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121276088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信