{"title":"Evaluating Aesthetic Experiences via Immersive Virtual Environments and EEG: Toward the Integration of Neuroscience Tools in Design Assessment","authors":"Fatemeh Taherysayah , Claudia Westermann , Hai-Ning Liang , Welber Marinovic , Faeze Taheri Sayah , Haoyu Wu , Ziming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The significance of aesthetic experiences in shaping human perception and interaction with spaces has long been acknowledged in art and design theory. While neuroscience research highlights the importance of aesthetic experiences, empirical studies examining spatial experience and the influence of the environment on aesthetic perception using neuroscience technologies remain scarce. This study addresses this gap by investigating users’ aesthetic experiences in immersive environments that allow free movement under varying conditions. The objective is to evaluate whether consumer-grade biosensor technologies can assist architectural researchers in exploring how design decisions influence aesthetic experience. Using a 32-channel EEG system, the experiment explored the aesthetic experiences of 25 participants across three immersive VR environments. Analyses were conducted using Power Spectral Density and Linear Mixed-Effects Modelling. Results linking neural activity to aesthetic ratings reveal suppressive effects of left and mid-parietal beta activity on aesthetic perception, alongside facilitatory effects from right central low-gamma activity. Furthermore, the findings indicate that the environment modulates aesthetic experience through a neuro–perceptual mechanism, highlighting the delicate balance between cognitive and emotional engagement and processing fluency in shaping aesthetic perception.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 65-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147636685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Designing with Generative AI: Symbiosis, Authorship, and the Evolving Image","authors":"Morteza Abdipour","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores how generative AI reshapes authorship, presence, and meaning in design. To situate this shift, it compares today’s disruption with photography’s nineteenth-century challenge to painting, when automation displaced documentation and creativity shifted toward perception and subjectivity. A similar redistribution occurs today: as generative systems automate craft, creativity is reconfigured toward prompting, iteration, and negotiation. The article advances three conceptual contributions. First, the symbiosis–agency–meaning-making triangle offers a heuristic for analyzing how authorship unfolds in human–system interaction. Second, the concept of interactional literacy names the competences required to navigate co-adaptive AI systems, extending debates on design and AI literacy toward practices of negotiation and reflection. Third, aura is reframed through three models—prompt aura, interactional aura, and algorithmic signature—translating Walter Benjamin’s contested concept into design-relevant dimensions and showing how presence emerges as resonance layered across prompts, processes, and system tendencies. Together, these frameworks highlight that authorship is redistributed through negotiation and response; that aura is reconfigured as a relational presence built across iterative layers; and that literacy emerges not as mastery but as dialogue. For design research, the task is to develop systems, practices, and pedagogies that sustain authorship as accountable, plural, and open to critique in the age of generative AI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 85-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147636686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Crafting Sustainable Futures: The Role of Prefigurative Design-Led Approaches in Open Innovation Platforms","authors":"Venkat Aryan , Maziar Rezai , Christa Liedtke , Marc Hassenzahl","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainability issues in makerspaces stem from the unstructured nature of rapid prototyping and the lack of frameworks that bridge ethical, ecological, and social concerns. This study investigates how sustainability-related values are articulated, negotiated, and translated into material and procedural practices within makerspaces, and how designers shape these processes. Drawing on in-depth interviews across diverse makerspace contexts, the analysis develops an empirically grounded account of prefigurative design, showing how aspirational values are embedded in collaborative making. The findings identify value anchoring, anticipatory material experimentation, and collective governance as constituting a prefigurative design space—a theoretical and material construct in which alternative sociotechnical futures can be explored and collaboratively enacted. However, realizing this potential requires navigating constraints such as weak governance, superficial sustainability engagement, resource limitations, and difficulties in sustaining ethical commitments. The study highlights the evolving role of designers as mediators who facilitate reflexive deliberation, cultivate productive irresolution, and translate prefigurative orientations into actionable and context-sensitive design practices. By specifying the conditions and mechanisms that sustain prefigurative design, the study shows how makerspaces generate both technical and non-technical outcomes, functioning not only as hubs for prototyping but also as environments in which socially just and sustainability-oriented futures are materially and procedurally crafted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 29-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147636684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Impact of Design on the Modernization of Finland","authors":"Yrjö Sotamaa","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines the impact of design on the modernization of Finland. The international breakthrough of Finnish design in the 1950s marks a period of aesthetic modernization of the country. In the 1960s, Finnish design underwent a radical turn. Critics faulted it for being elitist. They claimed that the numerous prizes Finnish design had won and its manifestly aesthetic spirit had distracted attention from designers’ true responsibilities, which lay with ordinary people. As a result, the focus shifted from beauty toward the social impacts of design. After the breakthrough of industrial design in the 1970s, attention turned to the strategic potential of design in the management of businesses and organizations. The late 1990s also saw a period of methodological renewal driven by research, which laid the foundations for user-centered design thinking. A major step forward took place in 2000, when the Finnish Government adopted a national design strategy. This long trajectory of design paved the way for Aalto University, a new innovation university, where design plays a key role. Today, design perspectives have expanded from human-centered to planet-centered thinking, supporting the socially transformative goals outlined in the <em>Cumulus Design Declaration 2025</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 107-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147636687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unmaking Ready-Made Futures of the DIY Chair","authors":"Merle Kathleen Ibach","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores the concept of “ready-made futures” through the lens of the DIY chair to examine the consequences that arise when industrial design aligns with capitalism. Initially conceived as critiques of consumerism, iconic DIY chair designs have since been commodified. Examples include Enzo Mari’s Sedia Uno and Van Bo Le Mentzel’s 24-Euro Chair. These designs turned the act of “doing it yourself” into a marketable promise of empowerment. Today, they offer ready-made solutions in the form of toolkits that effectively exclude genuine alternatives. This transformation reflects the defuturing spirit of modernist design: DIY, once positioned as a counter practice to industrial mass production, now serves neoliberal logics of self-reliance, precarity, and consumption. Addressing this tension, the article introduces a participatory design workshop in which participants collectively made and unmade DIY chairs. Rather than producing new consumer goods, the workshop created material expressions of social critique addressing issues such as aging, precarious labor, migration, and environmental care. Drawing on the concepts of unmaking to critique the emphasis in design on production and progress, the article demonstrates how exploratory design practices can challenge dominant narratives and open alternative imaginaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 7-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147636683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Review of Introduction to Design Psychology by Eleni Kalantidou","authors":"Peter A. Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sheji.2025.10.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 553-556"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Future Making: Imagining and Crafting Futures in a Diverse World","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2025.11.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sheji.2025.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 393-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gijs van Leeuwen , Abhigyan Singh , Bregje F. van Eekelen , David Keyson
{"title":"Design Anthropology and Ontological Future Making: Transformative Action for the Emergence of Shared Futures","authors":"Gijs van Leeuwen , Abhigyan Singh , Bregje F. van Eekelen , David Keyson","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sheji.2025.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article presents a novel approach—Ontological Future Making—that prioritizes transformative action. Rather than considering distant possibilities and consequences of futures, this approach engages with the negotiation of futures in the present. It is based on a review of existing work from the field of design anthropology. The article describes three steps of Ontological Future Making: to understand the future orientations of actors involved, engage with the immediate tensions that arise from their negotiation, and transform the ontological conditions that constrain future possibilities. We illustrate the approach with empirical data from a local energy transition project in Amsterdam Southeast. In this empirical account, we describe the future orientations of project partners and local residents and identify tensions related to extractive research and disciplinary differences. We describe the actions taken to address these tensions and describe our collaboration with residents to establish a local energy community. We characterize this initiative as transformative action as it served to enable shared futures for the project. We discuss the implications of these findings, arguing that future making should be more direct, political, and relational.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 407-432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Resensing Visions: A Convivial Approach to Future-Making from a Global South Context in Hermosillo, Mexico","authors":"Marysol Ortega Pallanez","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sheji.2025.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Visioning—the act of imagining futures—plays a crucial role in design, projecting possibilities, desires, and intentional directions into the future. Yet visioning methods face significant limitations, especially in Global South settings. These include the challenge of asking individuals in life-threatening contexts to imagine ideal scenarios, and the persuasive force of innovations from Global North contexts, which reflect ontological and temporal linearity. To address these limitations, this article focuses on the future-making experiences of women and plants in public spaces in Hermosillo, Mexico. In this city, women and plants are excluded from public spaces by design. In response, women formed collective embroidery circles. As a culturally situated practice, embroidery loosens the constraints of linearity through embodied reflexivity and cyclical temporality. In these circles, women reflected on their relationships with plants and the local ecosystem; rather than relying on long-term visioning, they made futures through tactile and affective embodied encounters with the public space. The article introduces conviviality as an approach for future-making, emphasizing people’s capacity to transform their lives through relational, affective, and material practices. The findings cover three themes: re-existence of memories and recognition of possibilities; how women-plant entanglements reveal the value of those relations; and the convivial reappropriation of the public space through embroidery and design. By foregrounding affect, embodiment, and cyclical temporality, this work contributes to emerging conversations in design and organizational theory about how futures are imagined, enacted, and made available through transformative acts in the here and now.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 433-459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}