Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)最新文献

{"title":"Age of hepatitis B e antigen loss in Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous residents of tropical Australia; implications for clinical care.","authors":"Liana Neldner, Sharna Radlof, Simon Smith, Margaret Littlejohn, Allison Hempenstall, Josh Hanson","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.48","DOIUrl":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.48","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study determined the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status of people living with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in Far North Queensland (FNQ), Australia and their age of HBeAg loss. It was hoped that this would provide data to explain the stark difference in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals living with CHB in FNQ, a finding that has been hypothesised to relate to differences in hepatitis B virus genotype. We identified every FNQ resident with CHB, determined their country of birth, their HBeAg status, the age they lost HBeAg and whether they identified as an Aboriginal, a Torres Strait Islander or a non-Indigenous individual. We then ascertained whether these demographic and virological variables were correlated. Of 1,474 individuals living with CHB in FNQ, 278 (19%) were Aboriginal, 507 (34%) were Torres Strait Islanders and 689 (47%) were non-Indigenous. Aboriginal individuals were less likely to be HBeAg positive (26/278, 9%) than Torres Strait Islander (91/507, 18%) and non-Indigenous (126/689, 18%) individuals, <i>p</i> < 0.0001. Aboriginal individuals lost HBeAg at an earlier age (median (interquartile range): 30 (23-39) years) than Torres Strait Islander (38 (29-49) years) and non-Indigenous (36 (29-47) years) individuals, <i>p</i> < 0.0001. Aboriginal individuals with CHB in FNQ are more likely to be HBeAg negative than Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous individuals and lose HBeAg at a younger age. This provides a biological basis for local clinicians' observation that Aboriginal individuals with CHB in FNQ are at a lower risk of HCC and data to support the principle of genotype-based care in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comorbidities and confusion: addressing COVID-19 vaccine access and information challenges.","authors":"Katie Attwell, Leah Roberts, Christopher C Blyth","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.33","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.33","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, evidence emerged that individuals with chronic and immunocompromising conditions faced increased risk of severe infection, including death. The Australian Government and public health authorities prioritised these citizens' access to vaccines, including them in phase 1b of the rollout from 22 March 2021. Given the rapidly evolving knowledge and advice, we sought to understand what people with comorbidities understood about their eligibility, where they obtained information, and their experiences interfacing with the program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through the mixed methods project Coronavax, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with eight West Australians aged under 60 who signed up to the study's webpage and declared comorbidities pertinent to serious COVID-19 complications. Interviews were conducted during January-April 2022, audio-recorded, transcribed in full, and analysed in NVivo 20 using inductive methods. We validated participants' accounts of state government actions with a representative in person and in writing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified access and informational barriers - and a lack of understanding - about vaccine eligibility amongst West Australians with comorbidities. Amid a rapidly changing landscape of knowledge with subsequent policy implications, this group received insufficient information for their needs for understanding their place in the immunisation program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fast-changing knowledge about vaccines creates communication challenges for government and health professionals. We identify an urgent need to develop, pilot, and evaluate strategies for providing vaccination information in routine and pandemic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Respiratory diphtheria in the time of Omicron.","authors":"Annabeth Simpson, Paul Douglas, Jenny Draper, Vitali Sintchenko, Zoe Cutcher, Daniel Ashton","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.41","DOIUrl":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.41","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Diphtheria is a potentially fatal bacterial infection caused by toxin-producing strains of corynebacteria, most often <i>Corynebacterium diphtheriae</i> and less commonly <i>Corynebacterium ulcerans</i>. Incidence of the disease has fallen significantly since the introduction of vaccination programs; it is now rare in countries with high vaccination coverage such as Australia. This article presents the most recent respiratory cases of diphtheria in two children in New South Wales-the first locally acquired childhood cases in Australia in 30 years-and discusses potential contributing factors. These encompass the lack of clinical awareness and the delays in laboratory diagnosis in regional laboratories. The cases also highlight the problem of vaccine hesitancy and the role that primary carers play in addressing these anxieties. While clinical management of the cases progressed well, factors in the public health responses were complicated by access to appropriate care and by delays in antibiotic sensitivity profiles. The public health response to these cases raises important considerations for clinicians and public health practitioners, including preparedness for rare and re-emerging diseases, the need for culturally safe environments and the importance of addressing vaccine hesitancy. Preparedness requires consideration of the capacity of regional health systems with fewer resources and of how public health departments can support response to multiple crises. Preparedness also relies on access to necessary diagnostic laboratory resources, on up-to-date guidelines, and on maintaining awareness among clinicians for these rare infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Outbreak investigation of norovirus gastroenteritis in a childcare facility in Central Queensland, Australia: a household level case series analysis.","authors":"Connie Schulz, Amanda Wyatt, Jacina Walker, Nicolas Smoll, Emma Field, Gulam Khandaker","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.46","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.46","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Noroviruses are one of the most common causes of gastroenteritis in all age groups, including children. However, little has been reported on the transmission of norovirus within childcare facilities and the subsequent impact at the household level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an outbreak investigation of norovirus gastroenteritis in Central Queensland, Australia during May 2021, in a childcare facility and the associated exposed households. Case definitions and outbreak management were employed as per the Communicable Disease Network Australia guidelines for norovirus and suspected viral gastroenteritis. Each case or carer and respective household member was interviewed to determine the date and time of symptom onset, health outcomes, and infector-infectee pairs. We estimated attack rates within the childcare facility and households, and basic reproductive number (R0) for norovirus using time-dependent methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 people developed gastrointestinal symptoms as a result of this outbreak, with 25 cases (61%) acquiring the infection in the centre and 16 cases (39%) occurring at households. Serial intervals were estimated as a mean 2.4 days (standard deviation 1.7 days), with a majority of cases (73%) in children under two years of age within the centre. Three faecal specimens were obtained, all detecting norovirus genotype II. The time-dependent R₀ was 1.5 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.0-2.2).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The attack rate within the childcare facility was highest amongst children aged less than 2 years, highlighting the risk of infection for this age group. We recommend the exclusion of asymptomatic household contacts from childcare facilities to reduce the length and severity of norovirus outbreaks. Further investigation into childcare facility risk factors and associated households are required to optimise public health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Differential COVID-19 case ascertainment by age and vaccination status in Victoria, Australia: a serosurveillance and record linkage study.","authors":"Joshua Szanyi, David J Price, Kylie S Carville, Mitch Batty, Sarah Yallop, Suellen Nicholson, Theo Karapanagiotidis, Stacey Rowe, Sheena Sullivan, Vinay Menon, Daniel West, Lakshmi Manoharan, Eliza Copsey, Suman S Majumdar, Brett Sutton, Deborah A Williamson, Jodie McVernon","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.28","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare serological evidence of prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with linked coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case notification data in Victoria, Australia, and to determine <i>in vitro</i> SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation activity based on prior infection and vaccination history.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, participants: </strong>Four cross-sectional serological surveys were conducted between 30 June and 31 October 2022 (a period of Omicron BA.4/BA.5 dominance) using 1,974 residual serum samples obtained from the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory. Serological results were linked to COVID-19 case notification and vaccination data. Surrogate virus neutralisation testing was performed to obtain <i>in vitro</i> inhibition estimates by anti-nucleocapsid serostatus and COVID-19 vaccination history.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Adjusted anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid seropositivity by sex, age and region of residence; adjusted proportion of cases notified by anti-nucleocapsid serostatus, age and number of COVID-19 vaccination doses received; adjusted percentage <i>in vitro</i> inhibition against wildtype and Omicron BA.4/BA.5 SARS-CoV-2 variants by anti-nucleocapsid serostatus and COVID-19 vaccination history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies was inversely proportional to age. In October 2022, prevalence was 84% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 75-93%) among 18-29-year-olds, compared to 39% (95% CI: 27-52%) among ≥ 80-year-olds. In most age groups, approximately 40% of COVID-19 cases appear to have been notified via existing surveillance mechanisms. Case notification was highest among individuals older than 80 years and people who had received COVID-19 vaccine booster doses. <i>In vitro</i> neutralisation of Omicron BA.4/BA.5 sub-variants was highest for individuals with evidence of both prior infection and booster vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under-notification of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the Victorian population is not uniform across age and vaccination strata. Seroprevalence data that give insights into case notification behaviour provide additional context for the interpretation of existing COVID-19 surveillance information.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Yersiniosis outbreaks in Gold Coast residential aged care facilities linked to nutritionally-supplemented milkshakes, January-April 2023.","authors":"Candice Colbran, Fiona May, Kate Alexander, Ian Hunter, Russell Stafford, Robert Bell, Anne Cowdry, Fiona Vosti, Sharon Jurd, Trudy Graham, Gino Micalizzi, Rikki Graham, Vicki Slinko","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.30","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In January 2023, an outbreak of <i>Yersinia enterocolitica</i> in residential aged care facilities (RACF) was identified by the Gold Coast Public Health Unit and confirmed using whole genome sequencing. During the outbreak period there were 11 confirmed and 14 probable cases of <i>Y. enterocolitica</i> notified in RACF and 30 suspected cases with compatible illness. Eleven cases (20%) were confirmed as Biotype 1A non-typable (BT1A NT) sequence type (ST) 278 within 4-15 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of each other. Combined epidemiological, trace-back and laboratory investigations identified nutritional milkshakes, stored at ideal growing conditions for <i>Yersinia</i> and given to vulnerable RACF residents, as the likely outbreak vehicle. This highlights that <i>Y. enterocolitica</i> Biotype 1A can be pathogenic in humans and transmission via atypical sources should be considered in outbreak investigations. This report outlines the response and challenges associated with investigating outbreaks in aged care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Opportunities to strengthen respiratory virus surveillance systems in Australia: lessons learned from the COVID-19 response.","authors":"Freya M Shearer, Laura Edwards, Martyn Kirk, Oliver Eales, Nick Golding, Jenna Hassall, Bette Liu, Michael Lydeamore, Caroline Miller, Robert Moss, David J Price, Gerard E Ryan, Sheena Sullivan, Ruarai Tobin, Kate Ward, John Kaldor, Allen C Cheng, James Wood, James M McCaw","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.47","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.47","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Disease surveillance data was critical in supporting public health decisions throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. At the same time, the unprecedented circumstances of the pandemic revealed many shortcomings of surveillance systems for viral respiratory pathogens. Strengthening of surveillance systems was identified as a priority for the recently established Australian Centre for Disease Control, which represents a critical opportunity to review pre-pandemic and pandemic surveillance practices, and to decide on future priorities, during both pandemic and inter-pandemic periods. On 20 October 2022, we ran a workshop with experts from the academic and government sectors who had contributed to the COVID-19 response in Australia on 'The role of surveillance in epidemic response', at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Following the workshop, we developed five recommendations to strengthen respiratory virus surveillance systems in Australia, which we present here. Our recommendations are not intended to be exhaustive. We instead chose to focus on data types that are highly valuable yet typically overlooked by surveillance planners. Three of the recommendations focus on data collection activities that support the monitoring and prediction of disease impact and the effectiveness of interventions (what to measure) and two focus on surveillance methods and capabilities (how to measure). Implementation of our recommendations would enable more robust, timely, and impactful epidemic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"To B or not to B: how the hepatitis B surveillance case definition can misdirect public health actions.","authors":"Anna B Pierce, Simon Crouch, Edura Jalil, Adrian Alexander, Joe Sasadeusz, Victor Au Yeung, Aswan Tai, Rhonda L Stuart","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.39","DOIUrl":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.39","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Surveillance case definitions are utilised to understand the epidemiology of communicable diseases and to inform public health actions. We report a case of hepatitis B infection that meets the case definition for newly acquired infection. However, further investigation revealed that this was most likely past resolved hepatitis B infection with subsequent reactivation secondary to immunosuppression, rather than a newly acquired infection. This case highlights the importance of thorough case and clinician interviews, in combination with detailed assessment of pathology results in collaboration with treating clinicians, to determine the most appropriate public health actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The effect of COVID-19 public health measures on nationally notifiable diseases in Australia during 2020 and 2021.","authors":"Anna C Rafferty, Anna Glynn-Robinson, Dharshi Thangarajah, Ben Polkinghorne","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.26","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic prompted Australia to implement large-scale domestic lockdowns and halted international travel. However, the impact of these measures on national notifiable diseases is yet to been fully examined. In this paper, we expand on a preliminary analysis conducted in 2020, and conducted a retrospective, observational study using nationally notifiable disease surveillance system (NNDSS) data to examine if the changes identified in the first half of 2020 continued in Australia through wide-scale public health measures. We found that there was an overall reduction in most of Australia's nationally notifiable diseases over the two pandemic years during which wide-scale public health measures remained in operation, particularly for 23 social and imported diseases. We observed an increase in notifications for psittacosis, leptospirosis and legionellosis during these years. The public health measures implemented in 2020 and 2021 (including lockdowns, mask mandates, and increased hand and respiratory hygiene) may have contributed to the observed notification reductions. The outcomes of these measures' implementation provide insights into broader communicable disease control for mass outbreaks and pandemic responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Changes in norovirus incidence in Victoria, Australia, 2022: are we back to normal yet after COVID?","authors":"Leesa D Bruggink, Bruce Thorley","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.29","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>There were 108 norovirus-positive outbreaks in 2022, with 45 (41.7%) occurring during the first quarter (Q1), January-March. Aged care facilities accounted for 44.4% of norovirus-positive outbreaks; 43.5% were in childcare settings. Overall, the GII.P31/GII.4 genotype was the most common, involved in 39.4% of outbreaks; however, there were shifts in the most common genotype across the year. In Q1, the GII.P31/GII.4 genotype accounted for 73.3% of typed outbreaks, but by Q3 (July-September) the GII.P7/GII.6 was the most prominent genotype at 45.0%. In Q4 (October-December), the dominant genotype had changed again to GII.P16/GII.4 (52.6%). While the incidence of norovirus outbreaks in 2022 was average regarding overall prevalence and genotype diversity, there are still ongoing effects from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in relation to seasonality, outbreak demographics and specimen referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}