{"title":"Focused on Pedagogy: QR Grading Rubrics for Written Arguments","authors":"Ruby Daniels, Kathryn Appenzeller Knowles, Emily Naasz, Amanda Lindner","doi":"10.5038/1936-4660.16.1.1431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.16.1.1431","url":null,"abstract":"Institutional assessments of quantitative literacy/reasoning (QL/QR) have been extensively tested and reported in the literature. While appropriate for measuring student learning at the programmatic or institutional level, such instruments were not designed for classroom grading. After modifying a widely accepted institutional rubric designed to assess QR in written arguments, the current mixed method study tested the reliability of two QR analytic grading rubrics for written arguments and explored students’ reactions to the grading tools. Undergraduate students enrolled in a business course (N = 59) participated. A total of 415 QR artifacts from 40 students were assessed; an additional 19 students provided feedback about the grading tools. A new QR writing rubric included three main criteria (numerical evidence, conclusions, and writing), while a second rubric added a fourth criterion for assignments with data visualization. After two coders rated students’ QR assignments, data analysis found both new QR rubrics had good reliability. Cohen’s kappa found the study’s raters had substantial agreement on all rubric criteria (κ = 0.69 to 0.80). Both the QR writing (α = 0.861) and data visualization (α = 0.859) grading rubrics also had good internal consistency. When asked to provide feedback about the new grading tools, 89% of students shared positive comments, reporting the rubrics clarified assignment expectations, improved their performance, and facilitated the writing process. This paper proposes slight modifications to the phrasing of the new rubrics’ writing criterion, discusses best practices for use of rubrics in QR classrooms, and recommends future research.","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70471841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NumeracyPub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.5038/1936-4660.16.1.1428
Jane E Miller
{"title":"Beyond Statistical Significance: A Holistic View of What Makes a Research Finding \"Important\"","authors":"Jane E Miller","doi":"10.5038/1936-4660.16.1.1428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.16.1.1428","url":null,"abstract":"Students often believe that statistical significance is the only determinant of whether a quantitative result is “important.” In this paper, I review traditional null hypothesis statistical testing to identify what questions inferential statistics can and cannot answer, including statistical significance, effect size and direction, causality, generalizability, and changeability of the independent variable. I illustrate these issues with examples from an empirical study of the association between how much time teenagers spent playing video games and time spent reading. I describe how study design and context determine each of those aspects of “importance,” and close by summarizing how to provide a holistic view of importance when writing about a quantitative analysis. I also include exercises to guide students through applying these concepts to articles in newspapers and scholarly journals.","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135470806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NumeracyPub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.5038/1936-4660.16.1.1433
Jena Barchas-Lichtenstein
{"title":"How to Become a Numbers Person: Review of Making Numbers Count, by Chip Heath and Karla Starr (2022)","authors":"Jena Barchas-Lichtenstein","doi":"10.5038/1936-4660.16.1.1433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.16.1.1433","url":null,"abstract":"Making Numbers Count: The Art and Science of Communicating Numbers (2022), by Chip Heath and Karla Starr, is a practical guide to developing number sense. Full of useful tips and tricks, the book ends on a philosophical note that invites us to contemplate why each of us is simultaneously good and bad with numbers. The writing style is enjoyable, especially for a reference book, and it could generate fruitful conversation in numeracy courses as well as writing courses across disciplines and professions.","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70471973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NumeracyPub Date : 2022-12-14DOI: 10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1891
Nuraina Nuraina, Muliana Muliana, Mursalin Mursalin, Mila Kartika Sari Bangun, U. Rahayu
{"title":"DESAIN BAHAN AJAR BERBASIS AKTIVITAS PENALARAN MATEMATIS MENGGUNAKAN MODEL MISSOURI MATHEMATIC PROJECT MATA KULIAH ANALISIS KOMPLEKS","authors":"Nuraina Nuraina, Muliana Muliana, Mursalin Mursalin, Mila Kartika Sari Bangun, U. Rahayu","doi":"10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1891","url":null,"abstract":"The failure of students in studying complex analysis courses is based on student learning habits that only focus on memorizing concepts from the material studied without understanding it properly, and lack of motivation to repeat the material that has been studied. The teaching materials used in this course are textbooks. However, the textbook used still does not contain activities for students' mathematical reasoning abilities, students cannot learn independently from the book, because the material presented is difficult to understand, even lecturers who teach this complex analysis course have to redesign the material, writing in written form. hand is then given to the student. One effort that could be to improve students' mathematical reasoning abilities is to facilitate learning resources with supporting teaching materials. In this study, teaching materials will be designed based on mathematical reasoning activities using the Missauri Mathematical Project (MMP) learning model. The research method used in this research is the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) development model. The development of complex analysis textbooks based on reasoning activities using the Missauri Mathematical Project learning model is feasible to be developed with the percentage of assessment by media expert validators obtained an average score of 91.79% in the \"very valid\" categories, and media expert validators obtained the average score. a score of 88.62% with the \"very valid\" categories. The results of the small group validation obtained a score of 83.5% with the \"very valid\" criteria. The results of the large group trial obtained a score of 85.5% with the \"very practical\" criteria. \u0000Abstrak \u0000Salah satu kendala dalam mata kuliah analisis kompleks adalah kegagalan mahasiswa dalam mempelajari materi yang disebabkan oleh kebiasaan belajar mahasiswa yang hanya terfokus untuk menghafal konsep dari materi yang diajarkan tanpa memahaminya secara mendalam, serta kurangnya motivasi untuk mengkaji ulang materi yang telah dipelajari. Sumber utama yang digunakan sebagai bahan ajar pada mata kuliah ini yaitu buku paket. Namun, buku paket yang digunakan masih belum memuat aktivitas kemampuan penalaran matematis mahasiswa, mahasiswa tidak bisa belajar secara mandiri dari buku tersebut, karena materi yang disajikan sulit untuk dipahami, bahkan dosen yang mengajarkan mata kuliah analisis kompleks ini harus mendesain ulang materinya, menulis dengan tulisan tangan kemudian diberikan kepada mahasiswa. Salah satu usaha yang bisa dilakukan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis mahasiswa adalah dengan memfasilitasi sumber belajar dengan bahan ajar yang mendukung. Dalam penelitian pengembangan ini, bahan ajar akan disusun dengan berbasis aktivitas penalaran matematis menggunakan model pembelajaran missauri mathematic project. Metode penelitian yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini yaitu model pengembangan analysis, design, deve","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42186512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ANALISIS KESULITAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA PADA SISWA KELAS X MA AL-MUAYYAD SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2021/2022","authors":"Dyah Meiatun, Djatmiko Hidajat, Krisdianto Hadipraseyo","doi":"10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1819","url":null,"abstract":"Mathematics is a basic science that is widely used in various aspects of life. However, in learning mathematics in schools there are still many students who have difficulty learning mathematics. The purpose of this study is to (1) describe the difficulties experienced by students in solving math problems in the composition function material for class X MA Al-Muayyad Surakarta (2) to describe the factors causing difficulties in learning mathematics in the composition function material for class X MA Al-Muayyad Surakarta. . The subjects of this study were determined by purposive sampling technique, namely 3 students of class X IPS MA Al-Muayyad Surakarta with high mathematical abilities. This research is a descriptive qualitative research with data collection techniques based on the method of tests, interviews, and documentation. Data validation was carried out by time triangulation, namely by comparing the first and second test data. The data analysis technique used is data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results of the study show that the difficulties felt by students in solving composition function questions include, (1) Difficulty carrying out problem solving and (2) Difficulty checking again. Factors that cause students' learning difficulties are internal factors consisting of: (1) lack of understanding of the material, (2) lack of accuracy in doing (3) lack of accuracy in counting (4) students feel confident in their answers, and (5) students forget and don't used to rechecking. Meanwhile, the external factor causing the difficulty is the non-conducive environment that affects the students' concentration. \u0000Abstrak \u0000Matematika ialah ilmu dasar yang digunakan secara luas pada berbagai aspek kehidupan. Akan tetapi pada pembelajaran matematika di sekolah masih banyak siswa yang mengalami kesulitan mempelajari matematika. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk (1) mendeskripsikan kesulitan yang dialami oleh siswa pada penyelesaian soal matematika pada materi fungsi komposisi kelas X MA Al-Muayyad Surakarta (2) Untuk mendeskripsikan faktor penyebab kesulitan belajar matematika pada materi fungi komposisi kelas X MA Al-Muayyad Surakarta. Subjek penelitian ini ditentukan dengan teknik purposive sampling yakni 3 siswa kelas X IPS MA Al-Muayyad Surakarta dengan kemampuan matematika tinggi. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data berdasarkan metode tes, wawancara, serta dokumentasi. Validasi data dilaksanakan dengan triangulasi waktu yaitu dengan membandingkan data tes pertama dan kedua. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah reduksi data, penyajian data, dan menyimpulkan. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwasanya kesulitan yang dirasakan siswa pada penyelesaian soal fungsi komposisi meliputi, (1) Kesulitan melaksanakan pemecahan masalah dan (2) Kesulitan memeriksa kembali. Faktor penyebab kesulitan belajar siswa ialah faktor internal yang terdiri dari: (1) kurangnya pemahaman materi, (2) k","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43088637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NumeracyPub Date : 2022-12-14DOI: 10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1790
Mawarni Amelia, Yuli Fitrianti, Riza Agustiani
{"title":"ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GUIDED DISCOVERY","authors":"Mawarni Amelia, Yuli Fitrianti, Riza Agustiani","doi":"10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1790","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1790","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the level of students' critical thinking skills after the guided discovery model was applied. The type of research in this study is a qualitative development research using stages: preparation, implementation and completion. Data collection techniques in this study were observation, tests, and interviews. Observation was used to observe students during the learning process using the guided discovery model, the test was used to determine the level of students' critical thinking skills after the guided discovery learning model was applied, and interviews were used to confirm the test results obtained by the students. The subjects in this study were class VIII SMP Negeri 40 Palembang with a total of 6 students. Through the guided discovery learning model, the results of this study were that the students' critical thinking skills were (1) Subject S1 had high ability with the results of tests and interviews that met the five indicators of critical thinking ability and on the subject of master's degree based on the results of tests and interviews that met four indicators of ability critical thinking except for reason indicators, (2) Subject S3 had moderate ability with test and interview results that have met four indicators of critical thinking skills except reason indicators and S4 subjects based on test and interview results have met three indicators of critical thinking skills except reasons and concluded, and (3) Subject S5 and S6 had low ability in based on test results and interviews only fulfills one indicator of critical thinking ability, namely situation indicators. \u0000Abstrak \u0000Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk dapat mengkaji tingkat kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa setelah diterapkan model guided discovery. Jenis penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif pengembangan dengan menggunakan tahapan yaitu ada tahapan persiapan, pelaksanaan dan penyelesaian. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah observasi, tes, dan wawancara. Observasi digunakan untuk mengamati siswa ketika berlangsungnya proses pembelajaran menggunakan model guided discovery, tes digunakan untuk mengetahui tingkat kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa setelah diterapkan model pembelajaran guided discovery, dan wawancara digunakan untuk mengkonfirmasi hasil tes yang telah diperoleh siswa. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas VIII SMP Negeri 40 Palembang dengan jumlah siswa sebanyak 6 siswa. Melalui model pembelajaran guided discovery maka hasil penelitian ini adalah diperoleh kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa yang (1) berkemampuan tinggi pada subjek S1 dengan hasil tes dan wawancara telah memenuhi kelima indikator kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pada subjek S2 berdasarkan hasil tes dan wawancara telah memenuhi empat indikator kemampuan berpikir kritis kecuali indikator alasan, (2) berkemampuan sedang pada subjek S3 dengan hasil tes dan wawancara telah memenuhi empat indikator kemampuan berpikir kritis kecuali indikator alasan dan pa","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49246734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MATEMATIS LOGIS","authors":"Ayu Silvi Lisvian Sari, Cicik Pramesti, S. Suryanti, Riki Suliana Ranggawati Sidik","doi":"10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1901","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1901","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine high school students' understanding of the concept in terms of logical-mathematical intelligence. This study's subjects were three students, one from each of three groups of students with high, medium, and low logical-mathematical intelligence. The indicators of understanding concepts used in this study are Bloom indicators of understanding concepts, namely translation, interpretation, and extrapolation with Krulik and Rudnik problem-solving procedures. This study's instruments were tests and interviews. Data analysis consists of three steps: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. According to the findings of the analysis, (1) students with high logical-mathematical intelligence met the three indicators of concept understanding, namely the indicators of translation, interpretation, and extrapolation, as well as the five Krulik indicators of problem-solving. (2) students with high logical-mathematical intelligence fulfilled the three indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators of translation and interpretation, with 4 of 5 indicators of problem-solving according to Krulik and Rudnik fulfilled, (3) students with low logical-mathematical intelligence fulfilled one of the three indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators of translation, with 3 of 5 indicators of problem-solving according to Krulik and Rudnik fulfille. \u0000Abstrak \u0000Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemahaman konsep siswa SMA ditinjau dari kecerdasan matematis logis. Subyek dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari tiga orang siswa yang masing-masing dari kelompok siswa dengan kecerdasan matematis logis tinggi, sedang dan rendah. Indikator pemahaman konsep yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini merupakan indicator pemahaman konsep menurut Bloom, yaitu Penerjemahan (translation), Penafsiran (Interpretation), Ekstrapolasi (extrapolation) dengan prosedur pemecahan masalah menurut Krulik dan Rudnik. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Tes dan wawancara. Analisis data mencakup reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil analisis menyatakan bahwa (1) siswa dengan kecerdasan matematis logis tinggi memenuhi ketiga indikator pemahaman konsep yaitu indikator penerjemahan, penafsiran, dan ekstrapolasi dengan 5 indikator pemecahan masalah menurut Krulik dan Rudnik terpenuhi, (2) siswa dengan kecerdasan matematis logis sedang memenuhi ketiga indikator pemahaman konsep yaitu indikator penerjemahan, dan penafsiran dengan 4 dari 5 indikator pemecahan masalah menurut Krulik dan Rudnik terpenuhi, (3) siswa dengan kecerdasan matematis logis rendah memenuhi satu dar tiga indikator pemahaman konsep yaitu indikator penerjemahan dengan 3 dari 5 indikator pemecahan masalah menurut Krulik dan Rudnik terpenuhi.","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49613195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ANALISIS KESULITAN MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA MATERI BARISAN DAN DERET ARITMETIKA DENGAN INDIKATOR POLYA PADA SISWA KELAS X","authors":"Chindy Kurniasari, Djatmiko Hidajat, Yuni Astuti Handayani","doi":"10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v9i2.1959","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe students' difficulties in solving word problems on arithmetic sequences and series material with problem solving steps according to the Polya indicator, which consists of understanding the problem, planning a solution, solving the problem, and re-examining. The method used is descriptive qualitative research, with class X subjects totaling 35 students at SMA Negeri 1 Nguter for the 2022/2023 academic year. The research data collection technique is by giving a test in the form of story questions totaling 3 questions, with predetermined indicators. While interviews are used to check the validity of the data and continue the discussion to achieve research objectives. This study concluded that: 1) students are not used to solving word problems, 2) students tend to work on questions without going through the Polya problem solving steps, 3) students are used to working on convergent questions, and 4) errors occur in solving problems caused by students forgot the formulas on arithmetic sequences and series material. \u0000Abstrak \u0000Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendiskripsikan kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada materi barisan dan deret aritmetika dengan langkah pemecahan masalah menurut indikator Polya, yang terdiri dari memahami masalah, merencanakan penyelesaian, menyelesaikan masalah, serta memeriksa kembali. Metode yang digunakan yaitu penelitian deskriptif kualitatif, dengan subjek kelas X yang berjumlah 35 siswa pada SMA Negeri 1 Nguter tahun ajaran 2022/2023. Teknik pengambilan data penelitian yaitu dengan pemberian tes berupa soal cerita yang berjumlah 3 soal, dengan indikator yang telah ditentukan. Sedangkan wawancara digunakan untuk mengecek kevalidan data dan dilanjutkan pembahasan untuk mencapai tujuan penelitian. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa : 1) siswa tidak terbiasa menyelesaikan soal cerita, 2) Para siswa cenderung mengerjakan soal tanpa melalui langkah-langkah pemecahan masalah Polya, 3) Siswa terbiasa mengerjakan soal yang bersifat konvergen, dan 4) Terjadinya kekeliruan dalam menyelesaikan soal yang disebabkan siswa lupa rumus pada materi barisan dan deret aritmetika.","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47286089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NumeracyPub Date : 2022-04-30DOI: 10.46244/numeracy.v9i1.1785
M. K. Irsyadi, Ayu Silvi Lisvian Sari, Fitria Yunaini
{"title":"ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SOAL PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN NILAI MUTLAK BERDASARKAN KRITERIA WATSON","authors":"M. K. Irsyadi, Ayu Silvi Lisvian Sari, Fitria Yunaini","doi":"10.46244/numeracy.v9i1.1785","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v9i1.1785","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the types of errors made by students when solving equations and inequalities in absolute value linear form of one variable based on Watson's criteria in class X Online Business and Marketing 1 SMK PGRI Blitar. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative research with 35 students of class X Online Business and Marketing 1 SMK PGRI 3 Blitar City as subjects. The instruments used in the study were tests and interviews. The results of the study indicate that in problem number 1 it can be seen that four students make mistakes and do not give conclusions so the conclusions are lost. Then two students made incorrect procedural, errors data and there was missing data. For question number 2, it can be seen that the four subjects made mistakes, missing data, and missing conclusions. Then in question number 3, it can be seen that the four research subjects made mistakes in improper procedures, lost data, and lost conclusions. In question number 4, the four research subjects made incorrect procedural errors lost data, and lost conclusions and two of them made mistakes about the skill hierarchy problem. \u0000Abstrak \u0000Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui jenis-jenis kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh siswa ketika menyelesaikan soal persamaan dan pertidaksamaan nilai mutlak bentuk linear satu variabel berdasarkan kriteria Watson di kelas X Bisnis Daring dan Pemasaran 1 SMK PGRI Blitar. Jenis Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan subjek yang terdiri dari 35 siswa kelas X Bisnis Daring dan Pemasaran 1 SMK PGRI 3 Kota Blitar. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tes dan wawancara. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pada soal nomor 1 terlihat bahwa terdapat empat orang siswa yang melakukan kesalahan tidak memberikan kesimpulan sehingga kesimpulan hilang. Kemudian dua orang siswa melakukan kesalahan prosedur yang tidak tepat dan terdapat data hilang. Untuk soal nomor 2 terlihat bahwa keempat subjek melakukan kesalahan terdapat data hilang dan kesimpulan hilang. Kemudian pada soal nomor 3 terlihat bahwa keempat subjek penelitian melakukan kesalahan pada prosedur tidak tepat, data hilang, dan kesimpulan hilang. Pada soal nomor 4, keempat subjek penelitian melakukan kesalahan prosedur tidak tepat, data hilang, dan kesimpulan hilang dan dua orang diantaranya melakukan kesalahan tentang masalah hierarki keterampilan.","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49290402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NumeracyPub Date : 2022-04-30DOI: 10.46244/numeracy.v9i1.1750
M. Gunawan Supiarmo, N. Sholikin, Sri Harmonika, Affan Gaffar
{"title":"IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KOMPUTASIONAL SISWA","authors":"M. Gunawan Supiarmo, N. Sholikin, Sri Harmonika, Affan Gaffar","doi":"10.46244/numeracy.v9i1.1750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v9i1.1750","url":null,"abstract":"Computational thinking is a type of problem-solving ability using logical thinking that students do with regular steps. This cognitive ability is one of the important skills in supporting students with mathematical concepts. However, the advantages of computational thinking do not seem to be paid much attention to by education, especially in Indonesia. This is because the learning approach does not emphasize the positive aspects that can improve students' computational thinking. As a result, the average computational thinking ability of students is low. This type of research uses an experimental method of pretest-posttest control group design. The population involved was class XII students at MA Daruttauhid Malang, which consisted of 22 students in the experimental class, and 24 students in the control class. The research data is in the form of pre-test scores before being given realistic mathematics learning treatment, and post-test score data. The results obtained showed that the computational thinking ability of students in the experimental class was higher than in the control class. To be clear, this fact is measured by calculating the N-Gain scores of students in the experimental class with a value of 0.7 (high category), and the N-Gain scores of control class students with a value of 0.5 (medium category). \u0000Abstrak \u0000Berpikir komputasional adalah jenis kemampuan pemecahan masalah menggunakan logika berpikir yang dilakukan siswa dengan langkah yang teratur. Kemampuan kognitif tersebut menjadi salah satu keterampilan penting dalam mendukung siswa terhadap konsep matematika. Namun keunggulan dari pemikiran komputasional, nampaknya tidak terlalu diperhatikan oleh Pendidikan, khususnya di Indonesia. Hal ini karena pendekatan pembelajaran kurang menekankan pada aspek positif yang dapat memberikan peningkatan siswa dalam berpikir secara komputasional. Akibatnya secara rata-rata kemampuan berpikir komputasional siswa menjadi rendah. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen jenis pretest-posttest control group design. Populasi yang terlibat ialah siswa kelas XII MA Daruttauhid Malang yang terdiri atas sebanyak 22 siswa pada kelas eksperimen, dan 24 siswa kelas kontrol. Data penelitian berupa skor pretest sebelum diberikan perlakuan pembelajaran matematika realistik, dan data skor posttest. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh, menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan berpikir komputasional siswa pada kelas eksperimen lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelas kontrol. Untuk lebih jelasnya, fakta ini diukur dengan menghitung skor N-Gain siswa pada kelas eksperimen dengan nilai 0,7 (kategori tinggi), dan skor N-Gain siswa kelas kontrol bernilai 0,5 (kategori sedang).","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41526362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}