Journal of Global Ethics最新文献_第4页

Reason-based deference or ethnocentric inclusivity? Avery Kolers, Richard Rorty, and the motivational force of global solidarity 基于理性的尊重还是以种族为中心的包容？Avery Kolers、Richard Rorty和全球团结的动力

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2022.2138945

Lee Michael Shults

引用次数: 0

Human rights and ‘standard threats’: standard for whom? 人权和“标准威胁”:谁的标准?

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2023.2182341

Stacy J. Kosko

引用次数: 0

Connecting relational wellbeing and participatory action research: reflections on ‘unlikely’ transformations among women caring for disabled children in South Africa 将关系幸福感与参与性行动研究联系起来：对南非照顾残疾儿童的妇女“不太可能”转变的思考

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2023.2186468

Elise J. van der Mark, T. Zuiderent-Jerak, C. Dedding, I. Conradie, J. Broerse

{"title":"Connecting relational wellbeing and participatory action research: reflections on ‘unlikely’ transformations among women caring for disabled children in South Africa","authors":"Elise J. van der Mark, T. Zuiderent-Jerak, C. Dedding, I. Conradie, J. Broerse","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2023.2186468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2023.2186468","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Participatory action research (PAR) is a form of community-driven qualitative research which aims to collaboratively take action to improve participants’ lives. This is generally achieved through cognitive, reflexive learning cycles, whereby people ultimately enhance their wellbeing. This approach builds on two assumptions: (1) participants are able to reflect on and prioritize difficulties they face; (2) collective impetus and action are progressively achieved, ultimately leading to increased wellbeing. This article complicates these assumptions by analyzing a two-year PAR project with mothers of disabled children from a South African urban settlement. Participant observation notes, interviews, and a group discussion served as primary data. We found that mothers’ severe psychological stress and the strong intersectionality of their daily challenges hampered participation. Consequently, mothers considered the project ‘inactionable’. Yet, many women quickly started expressing important individual and collective wellbeing transformations. To understand these ‘unlikely’ transformations, a feminist relational account, in particular, that of relational wellbeing, proves essential. We reflect on the consequences of these findings for the dominant PAR methodology and operationalization, and propose to sensitize future PAR with marginalized women by employing relational wellbeing as an overarching ontological awareness.","PeriodicalId":35191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43698534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Editorial 编辑

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2023.2195739

Lori Keleher, D. Gasper, Vandra Harris Agisilaou, C. Koggel, Eric Palmer, Thomas R. Wells

引用次数: 0

Deparochializing global justice: against epistemic withdrawal, towards critical departure 去狭隘化全球正义：反对认知退缩，走向批判背离

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2022.2120526

Aejaz Ahmad Wani

{"title":"Deparochializing global justice: against epistemic withdrawal, towards critical departure","authors":"Aejaz Ahmad Wani","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2022.2120526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2022.2120526","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article critiques the ‘withdrawal approach’ to deparochializing global justice and argues for an approach that views ‘departure’ from mainstream theorization as integral to truly critical engagement. It introduces Aakash Singh Rathore’s approach to deparochialization – purportedly founded on Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice – as an example of ‘withdrawal approach’ which advocates repudiation of the West-centric and ‘profession-oriented’ academic debate on global justice, and promotion of context-sensitive theories. I argue that Rathore’s ‘withdrawal approach’ springs from an inaccurate reading of Sen’s The Idea of Justice and hence overlooks the critical spirit of Sen’s engagement with the global heritage of ideas and 'critical departure’ from parochial theories. This article further explores three analytical forms of parochialism that dominant theories of global justice may suffer from: epistemic, conceptual and descriptive. Using the case of India’s superrich and their culpability in global poverty, I demonstrate the parochial construction of ‘duties’ in Thomas Pogge’s theory of global poverty. I argue that deparochializing global justice, involving critical engagement with existing theorization along conceptual and descriptive lines, can illuminate a new way forward in global justice research.","PeriodicalId":35191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42384226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Telling a story in a deliberation: addressing epistemic injustice and the exclusion of indigenous groups in public decision-making 在审议中讲述一个故事：解决认识上的不公正和公共决策中对土著群体的排斥

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2022.2117232

Katarina Pitasse Fragoso

{"title":"Telling a story in a deliberation: addressing epistemic injustice and the exclusion of indigenous groups in public decision-making","authors":"Katarina Pitasse Fragoso","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2022.2117232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2022.2117232","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Deliberative scholars have suggested that citizens should be able to exchange arguments in public forums. A key element in this exchange is the rational mode of communication, which means speaking through objective argumentation. However, some feminists argue that this mode of communication may create or intensify epistemic injustices. Furthermore, we should not assume that everyone is equally equipped to take part in deliberation. Certain groups, such as Indigenous peoples, for instance, who may not be versed in rational forms of argumentation, may not be listened to or involved sufficiently in the deliberative process. Therefore, it seems we need an alternative mode of communication, such as storytelling, which is a first-person or collective narrative. Given this, how should we pursue this goal? This article aims to answer this question by analysing a local conflict involving an Indigenous tribe and a neighbouring community in Brazil and exploring the underlying testimonial and hermeneutical injustices. I argue that storytelling has an important normative and institutional role in public deliberation and show that its applied version could overcome epistemic injustices and lead to better public policies.","PeriodicalId":35191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45253958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Cooperative duties of efficiency and efficacy 合作的效率和效力

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2022.2135578

Niels de Haan

引用次数: 0

Humanitarian nations 人道主义国家

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2022-08-22 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2022.2110141

Elizabeth C. Hupfer

引用次数: 1

Oceanic cosmopolitanism: the complexity of waiting for future climate refugees 海洋世界主义:等待未来气候难民的复杂性

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2022-08-10 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2022.2105383

Odin Lysaker

引用次数: 1

Capabilities for epistemic liberation: the case of hermeneutical insurrection of the Network of Community Researchers in Medellin, Colombia 认识解放的能力:哥伦比亚麦德林社区研究人员网络的解释学叛乱案例

Journal of Global Ethics Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2022.2079707

Monique Leivas Vargas, A. B. Aristizábal, Lina María Zuluaga García

{"title":"Capabilities for epistemic liberation: the case of hermeneutical insurrection of the Network of Community Researchers in Medellin, Colombia","authors":"Monique Leivas Vargas, A. B. Aristizábal, Lina María Zuluaga García","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2022.2079707","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2022.2079707","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Community leaders in Colombia have historically suffered processes of microaggressions and intimidation that threaten the free exercise of their voice in the processes of production of knowledge and in the participation of the planning of their territories. In this article, we explore the case study of the Network of Community Researchers (NCR), also known in Spanish as Red de Investigadores Comunitarios, promoted by the University of Antioquia, Colombia. The NCR is a commitment to the co-production of knowledge about human security from below between community researchers and academics. This article analyses the contribution of the NCR to the human security of Medellin and a specific collection of capabilities for epistemic liberation of community researchers: the capability to be recognised as a producer of valid knowledge, to do through communicative openness, to learn from collective knowledge and to transform through collective action. The expansion of these four capabilities evidence processes of resistance and hermeneutic insurrection of some community leaders and activists who participate in the NCR. The analysis shows the contribution of the NCR to facilitate and generate a safe space in which community researchers communicate knowledge and practices and share experiences, risks, struggles, fears and collective dreams of transformation.","PeriodicalId":35191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41250756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1