编辑

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Lori Keleher, D. Gasper, Vandra Harris Agisilaou, C. Koggel, Eric Palmer, Thomas R. Wells
{"title":"编辑","authors":"Lori Keleher, D. Gasper, Vandra Harris Agisilaou, C. Koggel, Eric Palmer, Thomas R. Wells","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2023.2195739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and research that increased wellbeing happens through participants being able to re fl ect on and prioritize di ffi culties they face in a process that then leads to acquiring and achieving impetus and action toward improving their lives and wellbeing. The authors challenge these assumptions by showing that their engagement with mothers of disabled children in this South African settlement exhibited improvements to wellbeing apart from the process of being able to re fl ect, prioritize, and then act. They argue that wellbeing was enhanced in and through relationships these mothers formed with other mothers of disabled children in the study. Van der Mark et al. argue that using the lens of relationships challenges accounts that focus on and measure indi-vidual achievements of wellbeing. Their account of relational wellbeing is better able to capture the background conditions of daily and intersecting challenges that these mothers face and how improvements to wellbeing can happen in and through relationships with those similarly and locally situated as they act together to change their lives and improve their wellbeing","PeriodicalId":35191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Lori Keleher, D. Gasper, Vandra Harris Agisilaou, C. Koggel, Eric Palmer, Thomas R. Wells\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17449626.2023.2195739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and research that increased wellbeing happens through participants being able to re fl ect on and prioritize di ffi culties they face in a process that then leads to acquiring and achieving impetus and action toward improving their lives and wellbeing. The authors challenge these assumptions by showing that their engagement with mothers of disabled children in this South African settlement exhibited improvements to wellbeing apart from the process of being able to re fl ect, prioritize, and then act. They argue that wellbeing was enhanced in and through relationships these mothers formed with other mothers of disabled children in the study. Van der Mark et al. argue that using the lens of relationships challenges accounts that focus on and measure indi-vidual achievements of wellbeing. Their account of relational wellbeing is better able to capture the background conditions of daily and intersecting challenges that these mothers face and how improvements to wellbeing can happen in and through relationships with those similarly and locally situated as they act together to change their lives and improve their wellbeing\",\"PeriodicalId\":35191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Ethics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2023.2195739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2023.2195739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,通过参与者能够反思和优先考虑他们在这个过程中面临的困难,从而获得并实现改善生活和幸福感的动力和行动,从而提高幸福感。作者对这些假设提出了质疑,他们表明,在这个南非定居点,他们与残疾儿童母亲的接触除了能够反思、优先考虑并采取行动之外,还表现出了幸福感的改善。他们认为,在研究中,这些母亲与其他残疾儿童母亲建立的关系增强了幸福感。范德马克等人认为,使用关系的视角对关注和衡量个人幸福成就的账户提出了挑战。他们对关系幸福感的描述能够更好地捕捉到这些母亲面临的日常和交叉挑战的背景条件,以及在她们共同行动改变生活和改善幸福感的过程中,如何通过与处境相似和当地的母亲的关系来改善幸福感
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial
and research that increased wellbeing happens through participants being able to re fl ect on and prioritize di ffi culties they face in a process that then leads to acquiring and achieving impetus and action toward improving their lives and wellbeing. The authors challenge these assumptions by showing that their engagement with mothers of disabled children in this South African settlement exhibited improvements to wellbeing apart from the process of being able to re fl ect, prioritize, and then act. They argue that wellbeing was enhanced in and through relationships these mothers formed with other mothers of disabled children in the study. Van der Mark et al. argue that using the lens of relationships challenges accounts that focus on and measure indi-vidual achievements of wellbeing. Their account of relational wellbeing is better able to capture the background conditions of daily and intersecting challenges that these mothers face and how improvements to wellbeing can happen in and through relationships with those similarly and locally situated as they act together to change their lives and improve their wellbeing
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Ethics
Journal of Global Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信