{"title":"","authors":"Guillaume Beaumier","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100129","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100129","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000331/pdfft?md5=c37a688c454a5c0b2fbd50cb99b11ffe&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000331-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43347824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rakhyun E. Kim, Catherine Blanchard, Louis J. Kotzé
{"title":"Law, systems, and Planet Earth: Editorial","authors":"Rakhyun E. Kim, Catherine Blanchard, Louis J. Kotzé","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100127","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100127","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000318/pdfft?md5=1c207b2fdba17fec7ae40aa462bc8b17&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000318-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47526789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Environmental security as a source of non-state legitimacy: An analysis of corporate governance","authors":"Julianne Liebenguth","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100133","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100133","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental security concepts are shaping the contours of global environmental governance. Although many scholars have analyzed the emergence of environmental security agendas within state agencies and intergovernmental organizations, greater understanding of how environmental security debates traverse transnational, non-state politics is needed to provide a fuller view of environmental security as a globally contested concept. Therefore, this paper examines how transnational corporations (TNCs) leverage and generate ideas about environmental security on a cross-border scale. Specifically, I explore the ways three TNCs —BP, Nutrien, and Veolia—turn to environmental security as a source of legitimacy in their broader global environmental governance agendas. I find that these TNCs rely on particular notions of environmental security to validate their roles in filling governance gaps, promoting democratic principles, and mitigating planetary crisis, particularly to appease a primarily Western, elite audience. Ultimately, I reveal how environmental security concepts inform non-state legitimacy claims and advocate for a political economic perspective for understanding the wider implications of environmental security as a power-laden concept.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000027/pdfft?md5=cb2cac4a715524216c2aa1fee7678ff0&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811622000027-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46212511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Planetary justice and ‘Healing’ in the Anthropocene","authors":"Adrienne Johnson , Alexii Sigona","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100128","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100128","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper challenges Earth System Governance (ESG) scholars to rethink the concept of Planetary Justice (PJ) in the era of the Anthropocene so it is more attentive to non-Western perspectives and sensitive to the experiences of Indigenous peoples. We combine findings from a narrative review with those derived from academic collaborations with the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band to propose the Indigenous principle of ‘justice as healing’ through ‘recognition’ as a crucial element in the emerging PJ framework. We argue that healing can be initiated by acknowledging colonialism as a driving force behind socio-environmental injustices, centering state accountability in environmental governance decision-making, and recognizing the value of restoring Indigenous knowledges and practices. Ultimately, we argue healing is the responsibility of <em>both</em> Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities. ESG scholars have an important role to play in supporting healing and enacting recognition within and among Indigenous peoples through their engagements with Native communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258981162100032X/pdfft?md5=3a8b8221670bdb3c2afee8a29529a3e2&pid=1-s2.0-S258981162100032X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45521548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jonathan Pickering , Thomas Hickmann , Karin Bäckstrand , Agni Kalfagianni , Michael Bloomfield , Ayşem Mert , Hedda Ransan-Cooper , Alex Y. Lo
{"title":"Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance","authors":"Jonathan Pickering , Thomas Hickmann , Karin Bäckstrand , Agni Kalfagianni , Michael Bloomfield , Ayşem Mert , Hedda Ransan-Cooper , Alex Y. Lo","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many democracies find it difficult to act swiftly on problems such as climate change and biodiversity loss. This is reflected in long-standing debates in research and policy about whether democratic practices are capable of fostering timely, large-scale transformations towards sustainability. Drawing on an integrative review of scholarly literature from 2011 to early 2021 on sustainability transformations and the democracy-environment nexus, this article synthesises existing research on prospects and pitfalls for democratising sustainability transformations. We advance a new typology for understanding various combinations of democratic/authoritarian practices and of transformations towards/away from sustainability. We then explore the role of democratic practices in accelerating or obstructing five key dimensions of sustainability transformations: institutional, social, economic, technological, and epistemic. Across all dimensions we find substantial evidence that democratic practices can foster transformations towards sustainability, and we conclude by outlining a set of associated policy recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000355/pdfft?md5=5c5b097910ffc28ba2ae7f770aae2908&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000355-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42721853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joost Vervoort , Astrid Mangnus , Steven McGreevy , Kazuhiko Ota , Kyle Thompson , Christoph Rupprecht , Norie Tamura , Carien Moossdorff , Max Spiegelberg , Mai Kobayashi
{"title":"Unlocking the potential of gaming for anticipatory governance","authors":"Joost Vervoort , Astrid Mangnus , Steven McGreevy , Kazuhiko Ota , Kyle Thompson , Christoph Rupprecht , Norie Tamura , Carien Moossdorff , Max Spiegelberg , Mai Kobayashi","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100130","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100130","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Games offer unique possibilities for imagining and experimenting with new systems of governance for more sustainable futures – new rules and institutions, new roles, and new dynamic worlds. However, research on sustainability games has mostly investigated games as a type of futures method, largely divorced from its societal contexts. In this paper, we argue that to unlock the potential of gaming for anticipatory governance in the service of a more sustainable future, it is important take a whole-society perspective, and examine the possibilities and challenges offered by contextual factors. Using the Netherlands and Japan as examples, we investigate the following questions: 1) How do governance cultures allow or restrict opportunities for the participatory exploration of futures using games? 2) How does, and can, the game sector in a given context support anticipatory gaming? 3) How do dominant societal relationships with games limit, and offer opportunities for, gaming for anticipatory governance?</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000343/pdfft?md5=d961b793be7cad7b03497d8f519243e5&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000343-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44938739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reimagining international environmental law for the Anthropocene: An earth system law perspective","authors":"Louise du Toit , Louis J. Kotzé","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100132","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100132","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Concerns have been raised regarding the ability of international environmental law to respond to potentially irreversible earth system transformations in the Anthropocene. We argue that in order for international environmental law to have the capacity to respond to the socio-ecological challenges of the Anthropocene, it should embrace an earth system perspective. Earth system law, which is grounded in an earth system perspective, has been proposed as a new epistemic framework to facilitate the legal transformations necessary to respond to such socio-ecological challenges. With reference to recent developments in the international environmental law domain, we discuss the ways in which international environmental law currently fails to align with such a perspective and the types of considerations that international environmental law <em>should</em> reflect in order to be more responsive to a transforming earth system and, thus, better fit-for-purpose in the Anthropocene.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000015/pdfft?md5=158272b15edc1de2bc3888becc029b33&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811622000015-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43490652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Gupta , D. Liverman , X. Bai , C. Gordon , M. Hurlbert , C.Y.A. Inoue , L. Jacobson , N. Kanie , T.M. Lenton , D. Obura , I.M. Otto , C. Okereke , L. Pereira , K. Prodani , C. Rammelt , J. Scholtens , J.D. Tàbara , P.H. Verburg , L. Gifford , D. Ciobanu
{"title":"Reconciling safe planetary targets and planetary justice: Why should social scientists engage with planetary targets?","authors":"J. Gupta , D. Liverman , X. Bai , C. Gordon , M. Hurlbert , C.Y.A. Inoue , L. Jacobson , N. Kanie , T.M. Lenton , D. Obura , I.M. Otto , C. Okereke , L. Pereira , K. Prodani , C. Rammelt , J. Scholtens , J.D. Tàbara , P.H. Verburg , L. Gifford , D. Ciobanu","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100122","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100122","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As human activity threatens to make the planet unsafe for humanity and other life forms, scholars are identifying planetary targets set at a safe distance from biophysical thresholds beyond which critical Earth systems may collapse. Yet despite the profound implications that both meeting and transgressing such targets may have for human wellbeing, including the potential for negative trade-offs, there is limited social science analysis that systematically considers the justice dimensions of such targets. Here we assess a range of views on planetary justice and present three arguments associated with why social scientists should engage with the scholarship on safe targets. We argue that complementing safe targets with just targets offers a fruitful approach for considering synergies and trade-offs between environmental and social aspirations and can inform inclusive deliberation on these important issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000264/pdfft?md5=19c6c615c77374e7366d2cfd4b353e43&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000264-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47749697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The what, who and how of socio-ecological justice: Tailoring a new justice model for earth system law","authors":"Kamila Pope , Michelle Bonatti , Stefan Sieber","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100124","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100124","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since modernity, the mechanistic paradigm has determined how Western and Westernised societies live, produce knowledge, and regulate their interactions and institutions, profoundly influencing law and undermining ecological integrity. This paradigm's key features induce the adoption of a reductionist notion of justice by international law, here called mechanistic justice. Following ecological approaches to law, earth system law offers innovative strategies to overcome mechanistic law. To be consistent with its objectives, this legal scholarship must adopt an alternative notion of justice. In this paper, we explore the synergies between earth system law and socio-ecological justice, analysing if the latter fits the purposes of earth system law. To this end, we present the three initial axes of socio-ecological justice, assessing its potential as a tool to support the shift to earth system law. Results show that socio-ecological justice is aligned with earth system law and could be adopted as a guiding legal principle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000288/pdfft?md5=df7e21155eca70c67f1b8fd524f2c07d&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000288-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44339818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From exacerbating the Anthropocene's problems to intergenerational justice: An analysis of the communication procedure of the human rights treaty system","authors":"Nicky van Dijk","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100123","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100123","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As our existing legal system is not equipped to adequately respond to climate change, earth system law scholars call for repurposing or transforming it. This paper analyses one shortcoming of current law—its inability to protect a safe climate for young people and future generations—by focusing on improving one legal framework, the communication procedure of the international human rights treaty system. Using the 2019 communication of sixteen children to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child as a case study, it highlights the opportunities and shortcomings of the communication procedure in advancing intergenerational justice, specifically related to democratic legitimacy, recognition and representation, accessibility, and impact. The analysis shows hope: even within a system that is inherently anthropocentric and grants massive powers to States, there is a drive in recent years that acknowledges the inherent interconnectedness of human behaviour and Earth's systems; and the past, present and future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000276/pdfft?md5=8b5c86a8ea2b4175ab1380faae315814&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000276-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45468577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}