Earth System Governance最新文献

Advising decision-makers: a new typology of scientific bodies in global environmental governance 向决策者提供建议：全球环境治理中科学机构的新类型

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100292

Véronique Fournier

引用次数: 0

Of time, whales, and other assets 时间、鲸鱼用户和其他资产

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100291

Valbona Muzaka

引用次数: 0

Whose risk counts? Climate risk frames in global green finance governance complex 谁的风险更重要？全球绿色金融治理综合体中的气候风险框架

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100288

Hyeyoon Park , Jakob Skovgaard

引用次数: 0

What space for justice? The just energy transition partnership with South Africa 正义的空间是什么？与南非的能源转型伙伴关系

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100285

Konrad Gürtler

{"title":"What space for justice? The just energy transition partnership with South Africa","authors":"Konrad Gürtler","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100285","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100285","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy transformations not only reveal multi-dimensional claims for just distribution, recognition, and procedures, but also how justice claims depend on and shape the spatial context that they address. Stakeholders involved in the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) with South Africa share the commitment to a just energy transition in the country, yet have differing conceptions of justice in mind. In this contribution, expectations and ideas of justice that various societal actors associate with the JETP are examined. The paper therefore asks what notions of spatial justice stakeholders bring up in the public debate about the JETP in South Africa. Conceptually, the focus is on four spatial justice aspects, namely on scalar, center-periphery, interterritorial, and infrastructure-related justice considerations. Based on qualitative expert interviews, a spectrum of spatial justice claims is revealed. The contribution finds that, firstly, the energy transition in South Africa has to address severe pre-existing injustices in South African society in a transformative manner, and therefore has to go beyond merely maintaining the status quo. Secondly, spatial justice debates have thus far been heavily focused on international relations, particularly on the negotiations within the International Partners Group and on the conditions of the JETP. Thirdly, subnational debates on spatial justice are only beginning to gain momentum, revolving around changes in center-periphery relationships, energy infrastructures, procedural justice, and ownership. The spatial perspective proves to be a helpful lens to illuminate the different, at times contradictory perspectives on justice in transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100285"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145026572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The climate atrocity paradigm 气候暴行范式

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-09-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100290

Gaspard Lemaire

引用次数: 0

Long-term programs, short-term effects? How development partners struggle to institutionalize renewable energy solutions in Indonesia 长期计划，短期效果？发展伙伴如何努力将印尼的可再生能源解决方案制度化

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100282

Jens Marquardt , Fajar Wardani Wijayanti , Reza Fathurrahman

{"title":"Long-term programs, short-term effects? How development partners struggle to institutionalize renewable energy solutions in Indonesia","authors":"Jens Marquardt , Fajar Wardani Wijayanti , Reza Fathurrahman","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100282","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100282","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article shows how long-term development programs struggle to institutionalize renewable energy solutions in the Global South. Our contribution is twofold: (1) Conceptually, we propose and apply a framework to investigate under what conditions and with what effects development partners institutionalize their renewable energy interventions. For the conditions, we build on institutionalization literature and particularly on the Earth System Governance research lens on architecture and agency. For the outcome, we distinguish between rhetorical, policy-related, organizational and practical changes. (2) Empirically, we mobilize this framework to analyze three long-term renewable energy programs initiated by development partners in Indonesia through a qualitative approach. Although these programs trigger rhetorical and partly policy-oriented changes, they struggle to foster new organizational structures or mainstream new political practices. We conclude that scholars must engage more seriously with agency and architecture as critical conditions for externally driven efforts to promote renewable energy solutions in the Global South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100282"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144988818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Aerial imagery to support participatory landscape decision-making 航拍图像支持参与式景观决策

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100287

Yilin Huang , Eva Lieberherr , Khammeun Nandee , Chaloun Bounithiphonh , Jasmin Krähenbühl , Phonevilay Sichanthongthip , Fritz Kleinschroth

{"title":"Aerial imagery to support participatory landscape decision-making","authors":"Yilin Huang , Eva Lieberherr , Khammeun Nandee , Chaloun Bounithiphonh , Jasmin Krähenbühl , Phonevilay Sichanthongthip , Fritz Kleinschroth","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100287","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100287","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective land-use management is crucial for addressing sustainability challenges. Participatory landscape planning can facilitate this by integrating diverse stakeholders and local knowledge. Our study explores the use of drone-captured aerial imagery to enhance shared understanding and knowledge co-production in 27 village councils in Laos. We show that this imagery supports participatory planning by making spatial information more interpretable. Using Participatory Action Research (PAR), we evaluate the effectiveness of aerial imagery, comparing nadir and oblique drone images with satellite images to assess their interpretability by local stakeholders. We found that nadir images provided highest identification rates of natural and built features, while oblique imagery was preferred for self-localization and contextual understanding. The study demonstrates that such images help stakeholders understand the landscape from new perspectives, essential for informed land-management decisions. Our findings highlight the need to integrate technological tools with local knowledge to ensure inclusive environmental governance grounded in community experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100287"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144925917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Resolving climate action and inequality in tandem? A global review of states’ climate pledges to the Paris Agreement 同时解决气候行动和不平等问题？对各国对《巴黎协定》的气候承诺进行全球审查

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100289

Maria Jernnäs

{"title":"Resolving climate action and inequality in tandem? A global review of states’ climate pledges to the Paris Agreement","authors":"Maria Jernnäs","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100289","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100289","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change and inequalities are intrinsically linked, both in terms of unequal responsibilities for causing emissions, and who bears the brunt of its effects. The impact of and consequences for inequalities also need to be considered when policy responses to climate change are designed, but such consideration is hitherto underdeveloped in both research and practice. In this article, the construction of interlinkages between climate action and inequalities states’ Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement is put under scrutiny. In light of growing calls to enhance coherence between the 2030 Agenda and the climate goals, and as a counterweight to the oftentimes technocratic accounts of policy coherence, this study examines how states problematize climate action and inequalities by studying both how interactions are portrayed, and which interventions are suggested to address them. As states gear up for the consideration of a next round of NDCs, this study contributes a critical analysis of how cross-cutting issues are incorporated and identifies opportunities and challenges for inclusion and assessment of inequalities in the NDC process of the Paris Agreement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100289"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144925918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Onshoring low-carbon supply chains: Can subsidies meet the challenge? 在岸低碳供应链：补贴能否应对挑战？

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100286

Chris Arsenault , Raphael Deberdt , Philippe Le Billon

引用次数: 0

Failure or success? Biodiversity policy integration into the agricultural policy of the new EU Member States – the Croatian experience 失败还是成功？将生物多样性政策纳入欧盟新成员国的农业政策-克罗地亚的经验

IF 4.6

Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100284

Lucija Pečurlić , Emil Erjavec , Tihana Sudarić , Tanja Šumrada

{"title":"Failure or success? Biodiversity policy integration into the agricultural policy of the new EU Member States – the Croatian experience","authors":"Lucija Pečurlić , Emil Erjavec , Tihana Sudarić , Tanja Šumrada","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100284","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100284","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the adoption of EU nature conservation legislation, Central and Eastern European countries have witnessed accelerated biodiversity declines in recent decades. This paper explores the reasons behind the relatively weak integration of biodiversity policy into the agricultural sector, with Croatia serving as a case study. Conceptually, this study contributes to the understanding of biodiversity policy integration (BPI) by applying an adapted analytical framework that reveals how institutional and structural constraints shape the depth of integration in post-socialist contexts, offering insights for future EU enlargements and vertical policy integration. The study involved a comprehensive review of national legislation and an analysis of interviews with stakeholders and experts. Historically, Croatia's biodiversity conservation efforts were primarily concentrated on protected areas, with limited involvement of farmers. Agri-environmental schemes (AES) for biodiversity were introduced during the 2014–2022 CAP period, but were implemented on less than 2 % of farmland. Factors such as limited institutional capacity, a lack of biodiversity data, and insufficient experience in designing conservation programs resulted in relatively poorly tailored measures. Despite increased flexibility in the post-2023 CAP, few significant policy changes have been made, primarily due to a lack of stakeholder collaboration and inadequate institutional support for new approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144893835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0