自愿性标准与可持续发展目标:规划可持续发展的公私互补关系

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Philip Schleifer , Clara Brandi , Rupal Verma , Katharina Bissinger , Matteo Fiorini
{"title":"自愿性标准与可持续发展目标:规划可持续发展的公私互补关系","authors":"Philip Schleifer ,&nbsp;Clara Brandi ,&nbsp;Rupal Verma ,&nbsp;Katharina Bissinger ,&nbsp;Matteo Fiorini","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To strengthen global sustainability governance, academics and policymakers have called for a better integration of private governance with public policy instruments. Surprisingly, however, systematic research on the state of such public-private complementarities in the field of sustainable development is lacking. With a focus on voluntary sustainability standards and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, this article addresses this research gap. It uses a novel dataset of 232 voluntary standards to examine how their policies and organizational processes interact with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals and their targets. We identify significant public-private complementarities, but also areas of institutional disconnect. We further explore how the creation of institutional linkages in this issue area is driven by instrumental, managerial, and normative concerns and develop an agenda for future research. This includes research on whether and how intensifying public-private interactions at the transnational level translate into tangible impacts for sustainable development on the ground.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000222/pdfft?md5=d0c4c56bc0d79e89a53d9158b5fa035c&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811622000222-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voluntary standards and the SDGs: Mapping public-private complementarities for sustainable development\",\"authors\":\"Philip Schleifer ,&nbsp;Clara Brandi ,&nbsp;Rupal Verma ,&nbsp;Katharina Bissinger ,&nbsp;Matteo Fiorini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To strengthen global sustainability governance, academics and policymakers have called for a better integration of private governance with public policy instruments. Surprisingly, however, systematic research on the state of such public-private complementarities in the field of sustainable development is lacking. With a focus on voluntary sustainability standards and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, this article addresses this research gap. It uses a novel dataset of 232 voluntary standards to examine how their policies and organizational processes interact with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals and their targets. We identify significant public-private complementarities, but also areas of institutional disconnect. We further explore how the creation of institutional linkages in this issue area is driven by instrumental, managerial, and normative concerns and develop an agenda for future research. This includes research on whether and how intensifying public-private interactions at the transnational level translate into tangible impacts for sustainable development on the ground.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000222/pdfft?md5=d0c4c56bc0d79e89a53d9158b5fa035c&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811622000222-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

为了加强全球可持续性治理,学者和政策制定者呼吁将私人治理与公共政策工具更好地结合起来。然而,令人惊讶的是,在可持续发展领域缺乏对这种公私互补状况的系统研究。本文以自愿可持续性标准和联合国2030年可持续发展议程为重点,解决了这一研究缺口。它使用232个自愿标准的新数据集来检查其政策和组织流程如何与17个可持续发展目标及其具体目标相互作用。我们发现了重要的公私互补,但也发现了制度脱节的领域。我们进一步探讨了在这个问题领域建立机构联系是如何受到工具、管理和规范问题的驱动的,并为未来的研究制定了议程。这包括研究在跨国一级加强公私互动是否以及如何转化为对实地可持续发展的切实影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Voluntary standards and the SDGs: Mapping public-private complementarities for sustainable development

To strengthen global sustainability governance, academics and policymakers have called for a better integration of private governance with public policy instruments. Surprisingly, however, systematic research on the state of such public-private complementarities in the field of sustainable development is lacking. With a focus on voluntary sustainability standards and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, this article addresses this research gap. It uses a novel dataset of 232 voluntary standards to examine how their policies and organizational processes interact with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals and their targets. We identify significant public-private complementarities, but also areas of institutional disconnect. We further explore how the creation of institutional linkages in this issue area is driven by instrumental, managerial, and normative concerns and develop an agenda for future research. This includes research on whether and how intensifying public-private interactions at the transnational level translate into tangible impacts for sustainable development on the ground.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信