Architecture and agency for equity in areas beyond national jurisdiction

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Lisa M. Campbell , Robin Fail , Rebecca Horan , Leslie Acton , Jeffrey E. Blackwatters , Alejandro Garcia Lozano , David Gill , Noella Gray , Rebecca Gruby , Emily Melvin , Grant Murray , Emilie Wiehe
{"title":"Architecture and agency for equity in areas beyond national jurisdiction","authors":"Lisa M. Campbell ,&nbsp;Robin Fail ,&nbsp;Rebecca Horan ,&nbsp;Leslie Acton ,&nbsp;Jeffrey E. Blackwatters ,&nbsp;Alejandro Garcia Lozano ,&nbsp;David Gill ,&nbsp;Noella Gray ,&nbsp;Rebecca Gruby ,&nbsp;Emily Melvin ,&nbsp;Grant Murray ,&nbsp;Emilie Wiehe","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (Ocean Decade) bring increased attention to various aspects of ocean governance, including equity. One of the Ocean Decade's identified challenges is to develop a sustainable and equitable ocean economy, but questions arise about how to conceptualize the multiple dimensions of equity in an ocean context. These questions become more complex as activities move away from coastal ecosystems and communities into off-shore Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), where ocean resources are recognized simultaneously as unowned/open access and as common heritage. In this paper, we mobilize the Earth System Governance analytics of ‘architecture’ and ‘agency’, to reflect on the possibilities for equity in ABNJ. Motivated by the general attention to equity in UN initiatives like the SDGs and the Ocean Decade, we describe current UN architecture for ocean governance, including principles that might support equity. Existing UN architecture focuses on distributional equity among nation states, with less attention to recognitional or procedural equity. State actors have most agency, while non-state actors can exercise some via broad UN declarations and through mechanisms like ‘major groups.’ We use on-going negotiations in the International Seabed Authority on rules for mineral exploitation and in the Intergovernmental Conference on an international legally binding instrument under UNCLOS on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction to illustrate how existing architecture shapes possibilities for equity in ABNJ. As new governance possibilities are imagined, attending to existing architecture and agency can help avoid further entrenching existing power imbalances and unwittingly reproducing or exacerbating inequities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000131/pdfft?md5=773100d4054adc110043ec09acb99891&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811622000131-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (Ocean Decade) bring increased attention to various aspects of ocean governance, including equity. One of the Ocean Decade's identified challenges is to develop a sustainable and equitable ocean economy, but questions arise about how to conceptualize the multiple dimensions of equity in an ocean context. These questions become more complex as activities move away from coastal ecosystems and communities into off-shore Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), where ocean resources are recognized simultaneously as unowned/open access and as common heritage. In this paper, we mobilize the Earth System Governance analytics of ‘architecture’ and ‘agency’, to reflect on the possibilities for equity in ABNJ. Motivated by the general attention to equity in UN initiatives like the SDGs and the Ocean Decade, we describe current UN architecture for ocean governance, including principles that might support equity. Existing UN architecture focuses on distributional equity among nation states, with less attention to recognitional or procedural equity. State actors have most agency, while non-state actors can exercise some via broad UN declarations and through mechanisms like ‘major groups.’ We use on-going negotiations in the International Seabed Authority on rules for mineral exploitation and in the Intergovernmental Conference on an international legally binding instrument under UNCLOS on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction to illustrate how existing architecture shapes possibilities for equity in ABNJ. As new governance possibilities are imagined, attending to existing architecture and agency can help avoid further entrenching existing power imbalances and unwittingly reproducing or exacerbating inequities.

在国家管辖范围以外的地区建立和促进公平的机构
联合国可持续发展目标(sdg)和联合国海洋科学促进可持续发展十年(海洋十年)使人们越来越关注海洋治理的各个方面,包括公平。海洋十年确定的挑战之一是发展可持续和公平的海洋经济,但问题是如何在海洋背景下将公平的多个层面概念化。随着活动从沿海生态系统和社区转移到国家管辖范围以外的近海地区(ABNJ),这些问题变得更加复杂,在这些地区,海洋资源同时被认为是无主/开放获取和共同遗产。在本文中,我们运用“架构”和“代理”的地球系统治理分析,来反思ABNJ公平的可能性。由于普遍关注可持续发展目标和海洋十年等联合国倡议的公平性,我们描述了联合国目前的海洋治理架构,包括可能支持公平性的原则。现有的联合国架构侧重于民族国家之间的分配公平,对承认或程序公平的关注较少。国家行为体拥有最多的代理权,而非国家行为体可以通过广泛的联合国宣言和“主要团体”等机制行使一些代理权。“我们利用国际海底管理局正在进行的关于矿产开采规则的谈判,以及在《联合国海洋法公约》框架下关于保护和可持续利用国家管辖以外地区海洋生物多样性的具有法律约束力的国际文书的政府间会议,来说明现有架构如何影响ABNJ公平的可能性。”随着新的治理可能性的设想,关注现有的架构和机构可以帮助避免进一步巩固现有的权力不平衡,并在不知不觉中再现或加剧不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信