{"title":"What research says to the science and engineering educator","authors":"T. Larkin, L. Richards, K. Smith","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1158676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158676","url":null,"abstract":"SMET educators have been inundated with pedagogical buzzwords such as constructivism, authentic assessment, active learning, etc. These terms are the outgrowth of various educational theories that suggest that learning can be enhanced if these approaches are adopted for use in the classroom. However, there often seems to be a divide between the theory and its practical application and implementation. How can SMET educators best begin to bridge this gap? To respond to this question, we provide a brief overview of educational research literature in science and engineering. We share some successful pedagogical approaches to teaching and learning that have been developed at our own institutions and that demonstrate how to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Successful practices include the use of case studies, active and cooperative learning, and writing/reflection activities. In addition, we highlight successful assessment practices as they relate to the enhancement of student learning.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"211 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131648616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A goals-oriented mechanics curriculum featuring applications","authors":"N. Salamon, C. Lissenden","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1158201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158201","url":null,"abstract":"All instructors visualize goals and, to use recent vernacular, learning objectives for their courses. In this presentation, the authors formalize both, distinguish between them, consider a unified thread informing a mechanics curriculum and illustrate it through applications. Taken piecewise, the elements employed here are not new, but taken together, as an integrated, systematic process, the curriculum differs markedly from traditional mechanics curricula. Students learn theory and apply it to do mechanical design and learn about project engineering, manufacturing and more. Because applications must be current, the curriculum remains vibrant and practicable. This is a work in progress.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133724894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
K. Gonzalez-Landis, P. Flikkema, V. Johnson, J. Palais, Ernesto Penado, R. Roedel, D. Shunk
{"title":"The Arizona tri-university Master of Engineering program","authors":"K. Gonzalez-Landis, P. Flikkema, V. Johnson, J. Palais, Ernesto Penado, R. Roedel, D. Shunk","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1158681","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158681","url":null,"abstract":"In collaboration, the three state universities in Arizona offer a Master of Engineering degree program designed to serve the advanced educational needs of employment-bound professionals and residential students. The resulting educational program serves a target population that is best described as technically sophisticated part-time students in full-time employment. Arizona's MEng program offered 25 web courses during Spring 2002, 84 students are currently registered in the program, and 16 have graduated. These numbers are all expected to grow significantly during the coming few years. Available courses, programs of study, student demographics, and program highlights and challenges are described, as are the administrative structure and industrial partnership that support this collaborative educational program.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122564932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
B. Davidson, R. Davidson, G. Gay, A. Ingraffea, S. Jones, M. Miller, L. Nozick, A. Zehnder, R. Sheckler, C. Rath
{"title":"Collaborative distance design of aerospace structures","authors":"B. Davidson, R. Davidson, G. Gay, A. Ingraffea, S. Jones, M. Miller, L. Nozick, A. Zehnder, R. Sheckler, C. Rath","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1158240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158240","url":null,"abstract":"Syracuse and Cornell Universities have developed and are currently teaching a new senior level design course that emphasizes teamwork, collaboration at a distance and multidisciplinary activities. This project is intended to be a path finder for NASA as it researches and works to gain the acceptance of technologies that will enable geographically dispersed personnel to work closely on projects. The design project is based around structural and thermal systems for a reusable launch vehicle. The students engage in design, analysis, simulation, building, and testing using virtual reality, and synchronous and asynchronous learning environments. The course is taught synchronously at Cornell and Syracuse using advanced teleconferencing facilities. A key feature of the project is that teams, consisting of students from both Cornell and Syracuse, must work together on their designs. This is facilitated by the use of an advanced, web-based collaboration environment that allows for asynchronous and synchronous communication, including audio/video conferencing, screen and application sharing, chat, instant messaging, access to reference materials and to design and simulation software.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"367 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134537325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L. Shuman, C. Atman, E. Eschenbach, D. Evans, R. Felder, P. Imbrie, J. McGourty, Ronald L. Miller, L. Richards, K. Smith, E. Soulsby, A. Waller, C. Yokomoto
{"title":"The future of engineering education","authors":"L. Shuman, C. Atman, E. Eschenbach, D. Evans, R. Felder, P. Imbrie, J. McGourty, Ronald L. Miller, L. Richards, K. Smith, E. Soulsby, A. Waller, C. Yokomoto","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1157986","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1157986","url":null,"abstract":"Thirteen engineering educators and researchers were each asked to choose a particular aspect of engineering's future to address. Each of the authors has contributed a short piece that has been edited into a discussion of the future as we collectively see it. Topics include the stimulating change, the changing university, teaching, learning, research, outcome assessment and technology as well as a look back at predictions for 2000.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115253744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Student assessment of faculty performance: an alternate approach","authors":"J. Wise, D. Sathianathan, T. Colledge","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1157959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1157959","url":null,"abstract":"Penn State uses a standardized instrument called an \"SRTE\" (Student Rating of Teaching Effectiveness) to obtain feedback from students at the end of each semester. A Likert scale reflecting level of agreement with several statements provides options ranging from one to seven. The results from this administration are summarized in numerical form and returned to both the faculty member and his or her department. This form of faculty assessment is limited in its ability to inform either curricular or faculty improvements, particularly when problem-based, collaborative-learning, or other nontraditional environments are being used This paper reports on a new approach piloted in Spring 2000 and implemented in the Engineering Design department at Penn State. Student teams are asked to write and sign a formal letter to the department head reporting on their experiences with both the course and the faculty. The qualitative feedback provided through this approach is rich and timely, aids in the interpretation of SRTE scores, and allows faculty to reflect on their performance on a deeper level.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125572718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Addressing those pesky ABET EC2000 criteria in capstone design: using communication activities to meet workplace expectations","authors":"B. Aller, A. Kline","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1158213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158213","url":null,"abstract":"The capstone design sequence is often selected as the site for addressing ABET criteria a through k. Increasingly, capstone design is designated as writing-intensive, serving to fulfill students' baccalaureate writing requirements and address ABET criterion (g). Yet assigning capstone design the responsibility of fulfilling communication requirements presents the challenge of understanding what and how these future engineers will be writing. A study of communication practices of working engineers, with particular focus on these engineers' capstone design communication experiences as preparation for engineering practice, was completed in 2001 and is being analyzed.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121078480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David E. Price, Dana Dahlstrom, Ben Newton, J. Zachary
{"title":"Off to see the Wizard: using a \"Wizard of Oz\" study to learn how to design a spoken language interface for programming","authors":"David E. Price, Dana Dahlstrom, Ben Newton, J. Zachary","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1157953","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1157953","url":null,"abstract":"We are in the early stages of developing a spoken language interface that will help beginners write programs. Our goal is a system in which a student will talk to a computer using English sentences, in response to which the computer will generate syntactically correct Java source code. We believe that such a system would help beginning students by allowing them to focus on concepts instead of syntactic details, and that it would also be a boon to students with visual or mobility impairments. As a prelude to designing and implementing such a system, we evaluated the concept via a Wizard of Oz study. Volunteer subjects were told that they were helping us evaluate a working system. In reality, an accomplished programmer was playing the role of the purported system, and we were studying how the subjects interacted with it. We describe the system that we envision, discuss the process of running a Wizard of Oz study in the context of our own recently completed study, and summarize our preliminary results.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123580317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Leadership/challenge short course: using research to improve instruction in engineering design","authors":"R. Knecht","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1158699","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158699","url":null,"abstract":"The Design (EPICS) sequence composes the first two engineering design courses in the design stem at the Colorado School of Mines. To improve the quality of the design experience funding was obtained from the NSF to examine team decision-making processes in the sequence. One research goal was to examine how men and women interacted during the design process and to use this information for improving future classroom instruction. This paper describes how the research results have been put into action in the classroom. Specifically, one result of this research project is the development of a team building routine, the Team Challenge Short Course. This sequence of exercises responds to the research suggesting that female students in Design (EPICS) I feel less confident about their contribution and leadership roles after completing the course. This was not found to be true for their male counterparts. This presentation addresses both the research supporting and the design of the proposed sequence of exercises.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116054532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Communicating the impact of an introduction to engineering course to engineering departments","authors":"M. Ohland, B. Sill","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1158182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158182","url":null,"abstract":"The Introduction to Engineering and Science course at Clemson has many objectives-for those that stay in the College, it is their first point of contact and helps them select a major; for many who will not major in engineering or science, the authors aim for students to discover this as early as possible. While responses to traditional survey questions are used within Clemson's General Engineering program to assess the value of the course to the students, this study focuses on the message department representatives want to hear. The departments this course serves generally set aside survey results from the general population of students taking the course, because the value of those results is clouded by the presence of many students who will never major in engineering because they do not pass prerequisite courses. This study therefore focuses on the major-changing behaviors of students who were eligible for majors in engineering. Combining the results of pre- and post-survey instruments with an analysis of student records, the study quantifies multiple ways that the course affects departments.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122372611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}