研究对科学和工程教育工作者说的话

T. Larkin, L. Richards, K. Smith
{"title":"研究对科学和工程教育工作者说的话","authors":"T. Larkin, L. Richards, K. Smith","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2002.1158676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SMET educators have been inundated with pedagogical buzzwords such as constructivism, authentic assessment, active learning, etc. These terms are the outgrowth of various educational theories that suggest that learning can be enhanced if these approaches are adopted for use in the classroom. However, there often seems to be a divide between the theory and its practical application and implementation. How can SMET educators best begin to bridge this gap? To respond to this question, we provide a brief overview of educational research literature in science and engineering. We share some successful pedagogical approaches to teaching and learning that have been developed at our own institutions and that demonstrate how to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Successful practices include the use of case studies, active and cooperative learning, and writing/reflection activities. In addition, we highlight successful assessment practices as they relate to the enhancement of student learning.","PeriodicalId":299238,"journal":{"name":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","volume":"211 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What research says to the science and engineering educator\",\"authors\":\"T. Larkin, L. Richards, K. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2002.1158676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SMET educators have been inundated with pedagogical buzzwords such as constructivism, authentic assessment, active learning, etc. These terms are the outgrowth of various educational theories that suggest that learning can be enhanced if these approaches are adopted for use in the classroom. However, there often seems to be a divide between the theory and its practical application and implementation. How can SMET educators best begin to bridge this gap? To respond to this question, we provide a brief overview of educational research literature in science and engineering. We share some successful pedagogical approaches to teaching and learning that have been developed at our own institutions and that demonstrate how to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Successful practices include the use of case studies, active and cooperative learning, and writing/reflection activities. In addition, we highlight successful assessment practices as they relate to the enhancement of student learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education\",\"volume\":\"211 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"32nd Annual Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

SMET教育者已经被诸如建构主义、真实评估、主动学习等教学流行语淹没。这些术语是各种教育理论的产物,这些理论表明,如果在课堂上采用这些方法,学习可以得到加强。然而,理论与实际应用和实施之间似乎经常存在鸿沟。SMET教育者如何才能最好地开始弥合这一差距?为了回答这个问题,我们提供了科学和工程教育研究文献的简要概述。我们分享了一些在我们自己的机构开发的成功的教学方法,并展示了如何弥合理论与实践之间的差距。成功的实践包括使用案例研究、积极的合作学习和写作/反思活动。此外,我们强调成功的评估实践,因为它们与提高学生的学习有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What research says to the science and engineering educator
SMET educators have been inundated with pedagogical buzzwords such as constructivism, authentic assessment, active learning, etc. These terms are the outgrowth of various educational theories that suggest that learning can be enhanced if these approaches are adopted for use in the classroom. However, there often seems to be a divide between the theory and its practical application and implementation. How can SMET educators best begin to bridge this gap? To respond to this question, we provide a brief overview of educational research literature in science and engineering. We share some successful pedagogical approaches to teaching and learning that have been developed at our own institutions and that demonstrate how to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Successful practices include the use of case studies, active and cooperative learning, and writing/reflection activities. In addition, we highlight successful assessment practices as they relate to the enhancement of student learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信