Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review最新文献_第5页

#NotMyFandom: The gendered nature of a misogynistic backlash in science fiction fandom #不是我的粉丝圈:科幻小说粉丝圈中厌女症的性别本质

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.53841/bpspowe.2020.3.1-2.78

Rebecca Wray

引用次数: 1

Perceived stereotypes about nurses in terms of competence predict nurses’ wellbeing and intent to leave the profession: A cross-sectional study in German intensive home care nursing 在能力方面，对护士的刻板印象预测护士的福祉和离开职业的意图:德国家庭重症护理的横断面研究

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.53841/bpspowe.2020.3.1-2.50

Regina König

引用次数: 0

‘I have to be at home’: Place and gender among student-mothers in higher education “我必须待在家里”:高等教育学生母亲的地域和性别

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.53841/bpspowe.2020.3.1-2.42

Thiago Bogossian

{"title":"‘I have to be at home’: Place and gender among student-mothers in higher education","authors":"Thiago Bogossian","doi":"10.53841/bpspowe.2020.3.1-2.42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspowe.2020.3.1-2.42","url":null,"abstract":"Mothers who study in higher education (HE) experience many roadblocks that typical traditional students do not. These challenges are most referred to in terms of a lack of time to dedicate to their responsibilities as students and carers. However, there is an overlooked relation between student-mothers’ identities and space, considering the classic dichotomy of private/home space and the public sphere that had prevented many women to study. Based on interviews (N=4) and one focus group (N=3) with student-mothers at a prestigious university in Scotland, this research examines their place in HE in the United Kingdom. Data analysis revealed that these students’ mobilities are constrained by their caring responsibilities but that they also challenge established gendered norms by building bridges between their homes and public spaces. Moreover, although all these students are marginalised due to their motherhood, other axes of power impact on their educational experiences. This paper provides an original contribution to discussing gendered spatial norms and accessibility of educational spaces using intersectional lens and moves the academic debate forward by exploring not only the spatial relations that constrain, but are also produced by, these mothers.","PeriodicalId":253858,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128331123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Exploring RuPaul’s Drag Race as a platform for public debate: Conforming and resisting idealised notions of drag (commentary) 探索保罗的变装比赛作为公众辩论的平台:顺应和抵制变装的理想化概念(评论)

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.53841/bpspowe.2020.3.1-2.82

Luke Ward, C. Dann

引用次数: 0

A Review of Barriers Women Face in Research Funding Processes in the UK 英国女性在研究资助过程中面临的障碍综述

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2019-11-26 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/27mdz

J. Jebsen, C. Abbott, R. Oliver, Erinma Ochu, I. Jayasinghe, C. Gauchotte-Lindsay

{"title":"A Review of Barriers Women Face in Research Funding Processes in the UK","authors":"J. Jebsen, C. Abbott, R. Oliver, Erinma Ochu, I. Jayasinghe, C. Gauchotte-Lindsay","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/27mdz","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/27mdz","url":null,"abstract":"In the UK, women are underrepresented at the highest levels of academia in all subjects but Nursing, but particularly in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) (Advance HE, 2018). Research, and the funding that enables research, is a critical point of career progression. Women apply less often and for lower amounts of funding, and are less successful than male colleagues (UK Research and Innovation, 2018). The common explanations given that women have to apply for more and more often do not sufficiently explain the gender disparities in research funding. This review critically evaluates some of the barriers and biases women face in the process of applying for research funding in the UK. Institutional barriers such as women carrying a heavier burden of teaching and academic citizenship, and lack of support, mentoring and visible role models impact on women’s success in securing research funding. Systematic barriers exist at many levels, particularly for parents and carers. These range from the impact of taking maternity leave, to grant deadlines falling during or shortly after school holidays and the requirement to travel for interviews. The focus on track record in grant review, biased language used in evaluation materials and unconscious biases on the part of reviewers further impact differentially on women. Lack of freedom to travel, and thus to network or attend conferences can result in exclusion from multi-national networks and the ability of parents to demonstrate an international profile. The policies and practices that impact on the ability of women to secure research funding must be reviewed and addressed with urgency for the benefit of the research community as a whole.","PeriodicalId":253858,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123928316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Feminist qualitative methods and methodologies in psychology: A review and reflection 心理学中的女性主义定性方法与方法论:回顾与反思

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.13

Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun

引用次数: 20

The sexism of men’s body dissatisfaction accounts 对男性身体不满的性别歧视

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.38

G. Jankowski

引用次数: 9

Deconstructing princess empowerment: A discourse analytic commentary on media representations of royal fashion 解构公主赋权:王室时尚媒体表征的话语分析评论

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.55

H. Malson, V. Golf

引用次数: 0

Age as trouble: Towards alternative narratives of women’s ageing 年龄是麻烦:对女性衰老的另类叙述

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2019-05-08 DOI: 10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.61

J. Raisborough

引用次数: 1

Standing still whilst ‘looking back and moving forwards’: The personal accounts of POWS members in the here and now 站在原地不动，同时“回顾过去，向前迈进”:此时此刻战俘的个人叙述

Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI: 10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.1

R. Capdevila, Katherine A. Hubbard, L. Donnelly

引用次数: 2