英国女性在研究资助过程中面临的障碍综述

J. Jebsen, C. Abbott, R. Oliver, Erinma Ochu, I. Jayasinghe, C. Gauchotte-Lindsay
{"title":"英国女性在研究资助过程中面临的障碍综述","authors":"J. Jebsen, C. Abbott, R. Oliver, Erinma Ochu, I. Jayasinghe, C. Gauchotte-Lindsay","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/27mdz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the UK, women are underrepresented at the highest levels of academia in all subjects but Nursing, but particularly in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) (Advance HE, 2018). Research, and the funding that enables research, is a critical point of career progression. Women apply less often and for lower amounts of funding, and are less successful than male colleagues (UK Research and Innovation, 2018). The common explanations given that women have to apply for more and more often do not sufficiently explain the gender disparities in research funding. This review critically evaluates some of the barriers and biases women face in the process of applying for research funding in the UK. Institutional barriers such as women carrying a heavier burden of teaching and academic citizenship, and lack of support, mentoring and visible role models impact on women’s success in securing research funding. Systematic barriers exist at many levels, particularly for parents and carers. These range from the impact of taking maternity leave, to grant deadlines falling during or shortly after school holidays and the requirement to travel for interviews. The focus on track record in grant review, biased language used in evaluation materials and unconscious biases on the part of reviewers further impact differentially on women. Lack of freedom to travel, and thus to network or attend conferences can result in exclusion from multi-national networks and the ability of parents to demonstrate an international profile. The policies and practices that impact on the ability of women to secure research funding must be reviewed and addressed with urgency for the benefit of the research community as a whole.","PeriodicalId":253858,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Barriers Women Face in Research Funding Processes in the UK\",\"authors\":\"J. Jebsen, C. Abbott, R. Oliver, Erinma Ochu, I. Jayasinghe, C. Gauchotte-Lindsay\",\"doi\":\"10.31234/osf.io/27mdz\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the UK, women are underrepresented at the highest levels of academia in all subjects but Nursing, but particularly in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) (Advance HE, 2018). Research, and the funding that enables research, is a critical point of career progression. Women apply less often and for lower amounts of funding, and are less successful than male colleagues (UK Research and Innovation, 2018). The common explanations given that women have to apply for more and more often do not sufficiently explain the gender disparities in research funding. This review critically evaluates some of the barriers and biases women face in the process of applying for research funding in the UK. Institutional barriers such as women carrying a heavier burden of teaching and academic citizenship, and lack of support, mentoring and visible role models impact on women’s success in securing research funding. Systematic barriers exist at many levels, particularly for parents and carers. These range from the impact of taking maternity leave, to grant deadlines falling during or shortly after school holidays and the requirement to travel for interviews. The focus on track record in grant review, biased language used in evaluation materials and unconscious biases on the part of reviewers further impact differentially on women. Lack of freedom to travel, and thus to network or attend conferences can result in exclusion from multi-national networks and the ability of parents to demonstrate an international profile. The policies and practices that impact on the ability of women to secure research funding must be reviewed and addressed with urgency for the benefit of the research community as a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/27mdz\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/27mdz","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在英国,女性在除护理以外的所有学科的最高学术级别中都代表性不足,尤其是在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域(Advance HE, 2018)。研究以及资助研究的资金是职业发展的关键点。与男性同事相比,女性申请的次数更少,申请的资助金额也更低,而且更不成功(英国研究与创新,2018年)。通常的解释是女性不得不越来越频繁地申请,但这并不能充分解释研究经费中的性别差异。这篇综述批判性地评估了女性在英国申请研究经费的过程中面临的一些障碍和偏见。制度障碍,如妇女承担更重的教学负担和学术公民身份,以及缺乏支持、指导和可见的榜样,影响了妇女在获得研究经费方面的成功。系统性障碍存在于许多层面,特别是对父母和照料者而言。这些问题包括休产假的影响、学校假期期间或假期后不久的拨款截止日期以及出差面试的要求。拨款审查中对以往记录的关注、评价材料中使用的有偏见的语言以及审稿人无意识的偏见进一步对妇女产生了不同的影响。缺乏旅行的自由,从而无法建立网络或参加会议,可能会导致被排除在跨国网络之外,也会导致父母无法展示自己的国际形象。为了整个研究界的利益,必须紧急审查和处理影响妇女获得研究经费能力的政策和做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review of Barriers Women Face in Research Funding Processes in the UK
In the UK, women are underrepresented at the highest levels of academia in all subjects but Nursing, but particularly in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) (Advance HE, 2018). Research, and the funding that enables research, is a critical point of career progression. Women apply less often and for lower amounts of funding, and are less successful than male colleagues (UK Research and Innovation, 2018). The common explanations given that women have to apply for more and more often do not sufficiently explain the gender disparities in research funding. This review critically evaluates some of the barriers and biases women face in the process of applying for research funding in the UK. Institutional barriers such as women carrying a heavier burden of teaching and academic citizenship, and lack of support, mentoring and visible role models impact on women’s success in securing research funding. Systematic barriers exist at many levels, particularly for parents and carers. These range from the impact of taking maternity leave, to grant deadlines falling during or shortly after school holidays and the requirement to travel for interviews. The focus on track record in grant review, biased language used in evaluation materials and unconscious biases on the part of reviewers further impact differentially on women. Lack of freedom to travel, and thus to network or attend conferences can result in exclusion from multi-national networks and the ability of parents to demonstrate an international profile. The policies and practices that impact on the ability of women to secure research funding must be reviewed and addressed with urgency for the benefit of the research community as a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信