Feminist qualitative methods and methodologies in psychology: A review and reflection

Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun
{"title":"Feminist qualitative methods and methodologies in psychology: A review and reflection","authors":"Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun","doi":"10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How does the current state of the field of feminist qualitative psychological research reflect and enact the methodological characteristics and values of feminist research – principally, the values of reflexivity, methodological diversity and innovation, and the prioritisation of feminist political goals over procedural, epistemological and disciplinary orthodoxy? Using a review of the methods and methodologies used in qualitative research published in two key feminist psychology journals (Feminism & Psychology; Psychology of Women Quarterly) from 2005 to 2016 as our starting point, we reflect on practices, trends, and apparent norms in feminist qualitative researching. Despite methodological development, the absence of a fully realised feminist methodological vision raises important questions. We suggest a need to query and push back at canons or orthodoxies within the discipline, and advocate looking backward to go forwards: innovation does not have to be radical, and many of our methodological feminist foremothers have a lot to offer the present and the future of our discipline.","PeriodicalId":253858,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

How does the current state of the field of feminist qualitative psychological research reflect and enact the methodological characteristics and values of feminist research – principally, the values of reflexivity, methodological diversity and innovation, and the prioritisation of feminist political goals over procedural, epistemological and disciplinary orthodoxy? Using a review of the methods and methodologies used in qualitative research published in two key feminist psychology journals (Feminism & Psychology; Psychology of Women Quarterly) from 2005 to 2016 as our starting point, we reflect on practices, trends, and apparent norms in feminist qualitative researching. Despite methodological development, the absence of a fully realised feminist methodological vision raises important questions. We suggest a need to query and push back at canons or orthodoxies within the discipline, and advocate looking backward to go forwards: innovation does not have to be radical, and many of our methodological feminist foremothers have a lot to offer the present and the future of our discipline.
心理学中的女性主义定性方法与方法论:回顾与反思
女性主义定性心理学研究领域的现状如何反映和制定女性主义研究的方法论特征和价值观——主要是反思性、方法论多样性和创新的价值观,以及将女性主义政治目标置于程序、认识论和学科正统之上的价值观?本文回顾了两本重要的女性主义心理学期刊(Feminism & psychology;《女性心理学季刊》(Psychology of Women Quarterly)从2005年至2016年为研究起点,反思女性主义定性研究的实践、趋势和明显规范。尽管在方法论上有所发展,但缺乏一个完全实现的女权主义方法论视野提出了重要的问题。我们建议有必要质疑和推翻该学科内的经典或正统观念,并主张回顾过去向前发展:创新不一定是激进的,我们的许多方法论女权主义前辈对我们学科的现在和未来都有很多贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信