{"title":"Feminist qualitative methods and methodologies in psychology: A review and reflection","authors":"Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun","doi":"10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How does the current state of the field of feminist qualitative psychological research reflect and enact the methodological characteristics and values of feminist research – principally, the values of reflexivity, methodological diversity and innovation, and the prioritisation of feminist political goals over procedural, epistemological and disciplinary orthodoxy? Using a review of the methods and methodologies used in qualitative research published in two key feminist psychology journals (Feminism & Psychology; Psychology of Women Quarterly) from 2005 to 2016 as our starting point, we reflect on practices, trends, and apparent norms in feminist qualitative researching. Despite methodological development, the absence of a fully realised feminist methodological vision raises important questions. We suggest a need to query and push back at canons or orthodoxies within the discipline, and advocate looking backward to go forwards: innovation does not have to be radical, and many of our methodological feminist foremothers have a lot to offer the present and the future of our discipline.","PeriodicalId":253858,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Abstract
How does the current state of the field of feminist qualitative psychological research reflect and enact the methodological characteristics and values of feminist research – principally, the values of reflexivity, methodological diversity and innovation, and the prioritisation of feminist political goals over procedural, epistemological and disciplinary orthodoxy? Using a review of the methods and methodologies used in qualitative research published in two key feminist psychology journals (Feminism & Psychology; Psychology of Women Quarterly) from 2005 to 2016 as our starting point, we reflect on practices, trends, and apparent norms in feminist qualitative researching. Despite methodological development, the absence of a fully realised feminist methodological vision raises important questions. We suggest a need to query and push back at canons or orthodoxies within the discipline, and advocate looking backward to go forwards: innovation does not have to be radical, and many of our methodological feminist foremothers have a lot to offer the present and the future of our discipline.
女性主义定性心理学研究领域的现状如何反映和制定女性主义研究的方法论特征和价值观——主要是反思性、方法论多样性和创新的价值观,以及将女性主义政治目标置于程序、认识论和学科正统之上的价值观?本文回顾了两本重要的女性主义心理学期刊(Feminism & psychology;《女性心理学季刊》(Psychology of Women Quarterly)从2005年至2016年为研究起点,反思女性主义定性研究的实践、趋势和明显规范。尽管在方法论上有所发展,但缺乏一个完全实现的女权主义方法论视野提出了重要的问题。我们建议有必要质疑和推翻该学科内的经典或正统观念,并主张回顾过去向前发展:创新不一定是激进的,我们的许多方法论女权主义前辈对我们学科的现在和未来都有很多贡献。