Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation charts for fetal growth in twins: nationwide Danish cohort study. 胎儿医学基金会图表对双胞胎胎儿发育的验证:丹麦全国性队列研究。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29125
S E Kristensen, A Wright, D Wright, K Gadsbøll, C K Ekelund, P Sandager, F S Jørgensen, E Hoseth, L Sperling, H J Zingenberg, K Sundberg, A McLennan, K H Nicolaides, O B Petersen
{"title":"Validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation charts for fetal growth in twins: nationwide Danish cohort study.","authors":"S E Kristensen, A Wright, D Wright, K Gadsbøll, C K Ekelund, P Sandager, F S Jørgensen, E Hoseth, L Sperling, H J Zingenberg, K Sundberg, A McLennan, K H Nicolaides, O B Petersen","doi":"10.1002/uog.29125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the validity of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) chorionicity-specific models for fetal growth in twin pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an external validation study of the FMF models using a nationwide Danish cohort of twin pregnancies. The cohort included all dichorionic (DC) and monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies with an estimated delivery date between 2008 and 2018, which satisfied the following inclusion criteria: two live fetuses at the first-trimester ultrasound scan (11-14 weeks' gestation); biometric measurements available for the calculation of estimated fetal weight (EFW) using the Hadlock-3 formula; and delivery of two liveborn infants. Validation involved assessing the distributional properties of the models and estimating the mean EFW Z-score deviations. Additionally, the models were applied to pregnancies that delivered preterm and attended non-scheduled visits (complicated pregnancies).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 8542 DC and 1675 MCDA twin pregnancies met the inclusion criteria. In DC twins, 17 084 fetuses were evaluated at a total of 95 346 ultrasound scans, of which 44.5% were performed at scheduled visits in pregnancies carried to 37 + 0 weeks or later. The median number of growth scans per DC twin fetus from 20 + 0 weeks onwards was four. The model showed good agreement with the validation cohort for scheduled visits in DC twins delivered at 37 + 0 weeks or later (mean EFW Z-score, -0.14 ± 1.05). In MCDA twins, 3350 fetuses underwent 31 632 eligible ultrasound scans, of which 59.5% were performed at scheduled visits in pregnancies carried to 36 + 0 weeks or later. The median number of growth scans per MCDA twin fetus from 16 + 0 weeks onwards was 10. The model showed favorable agreement with the validation cohort for scheduled visits in MCDA twins delivered at 36 + 0 weeks or later (mean EFW Z-score, -0.09 ± 1.01). Non-scheduled visits and preterm delivery before 37 + 0 weeks for DC twins and before 36 + 0 weeks for MCDA twins corresponded with smaller weight estimates, which was consistent with the study's definition of complicated pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FMF models provide a good fit for EFW measurements in our Danish national cohort of uncomplicated twin pregnancies assessed at routine scans. Therefore, the FMF models establish robust criteria for subsequent investigations and potential clinical applications. Future research should focus on exploring the consequences of clinical implementation, particularly regarding the identification of twins that are small-for-gestational age, as they are especially susceptible to adverse perinatal outcome. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142508946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting neonatal mortality prior to discharge from hospital in prenatally diagnosed left congenital diaphragmatic hernia. 预测产前诊断左侧先天性膈疝患者出院前的新生儿死亡率。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29121
S Shinar, A Otvodenko, D Kajal, P P L Chiu, S Lee, P S Shah, T Van Mieghem, Y Kunpalin, A-M Guerguerian, G Ryan, N Abbasi
{"title":"Predicting neonatal mortality prior to discharge from hospital in prenatally diagnosed left congenital diaphragmatic hernia.","authors":"S Shinar, A Otvodenko, D Kajal, P P L Chiu, S Lee, P S Shah, T Van Mieghem, Y Kunpalin, A-M Guerguerian, G Ryan, N Abbasi","doi":"10.1002/uog.29121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association of standardized prenatal imaging parameters and immediate neonatal variables with mortality prior to discharge in infants with isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (LCDH), and to compare the performance of ultrasound- and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based severity grading for the prediction of neonatal mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of infants with prenatally diagnosed isolated LCDH referred to a single tertiary center between 2008 and 2020. Fetuses with right or bilateral congenital diaphragmatic hernia, additional major structural anomaly or known genetic condition, as well as cases that underwent fetal intervention or declined postnatal intervention, were excluded. Ultrasound and MRI images were reviewed retrospectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed, incorporating prenatal and immediate neonatal factors to analyze the association with neonatal mortality prior to discharge, and a prediction calculator was generated. The performance of ultrasound and that of MRI for the prediction of neonatal mortality were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 253 pregnancies with fetal CDH, 104 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 77 (74%) neonates survived to discharge. Seventy-five fetuses underwent both prenatal ultrasound and MRI. On multivariable analysis, observed/expected (o/e) lung-to-head ratio and o/e total fetal lung volume were associated independently with neonatal death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.97), respectively), whereas liver position was not. There was no significant difference in predictive performance between using ultrasound and MRI together (area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.93)) compared with using ultrasound alone (AUC, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72-0.90); P = 0.19). The addition of neonatal parameters (gestational age at birth and small-for-gestational age) did not improve model performance (AUC, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.95)) compared with the combined ultrasound and MRI model (P = 0.22). There was poor agreement between severity assessment on ultrasound and MRI (Cohen's κ, 0.19). Most discrepancies were seen among cases deemed to be non-severe on ultrasound and severe on MRI, and outcomes were more consistent with MRI-based prognostication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In fetuses with prenatally diagnosed isolated LCDH, mortality prediction using standardized ultrasound and MRI measurements performed reasonably well. In cases classified as non-severe on ultrasound, MRI is recommended, as it may provide more accurate prognostication and assist in the determination of candidacy for fetal intervention. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142508945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biparietal diameter vs crown-rump length as standard parameter for late first-trimester pregnancy dating. 双顶径与冠状脊长度的比较,作为第一胎晚期妊娠测定的标准参数。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29124
H K Gjessing, P Grøttum, J M Dreier, S H Eik-Nes
{"title":"Biparietal diameter vs crown-rump length as standard parameter for late first-trimester pregnancy dating.","authors":"H K Gjessing, P Grøttum, J M Dreier, S H Eik-Nes","doi":"10.1002/uog.29124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the precision of biparietal diameter (BPD) and crown-rump length (CRL) as predictors of gestational age in the human fetus in the late first and early second trimesters, using a population-based approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed term and gestational-age prediction curves for first-trimester dating, based on 11 041 pregnancies with 12 260 measurements of CRL and/or BPD from a population-based Norwegian clinical database. We used a population-based approach with local linear quantile regression, combined with a time-to-event strategy that compensates for induced births. Term prediction precision was assessed by estimating and comparing the prediction residual curves using a time-to-event analysis. Individual differences in gestational-age predictions from CRL and BPD were assessed using measurements performed on the same fetus on the same day. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of not distinguishing between non-spontaneous and spontaneous births.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CRL and BPD provided almost identical term prediction precision judged from the residual distribution. In about 51% of examinations, the difference in predicted gestational age was 1 day or less; 24% of examinations had a difference of 2 days, 14% had a difference of 3 days, 7% had a difference of 4 days and only 5% of all examinations had a difference of 5 days or more. Incorrectly removing induced births from the analysis, or treating them as spontaneous, would cause a substantial systematic prediction bias of about 2 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on population data, using comparisons at an individual level, our study found that BPD is as precise as CRL when used for first-trimester dating. BPD has advantages from a clinical point of view, since it is technically less challenging and less time-consuming to measure compared with CRL, and can be measured and assessed throughout the entire pregnancy. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142508944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Near-miss criteria for stillbirth in global research: the 'In Utero' consensus. 全球研究中的死胎近似标准:"子宫内 "共识。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29120
S J Gordijn, A T Papageorghiou, A L David, S Ali, W Ganzevoort
{"title":"Near-miss criteria for stillbirth in global research: the 'In Utero' consensus.","authors":"S J Gordijn, A T Papageorghiou, A L David, S Ali, W Ganzevoort","doi":"10.1002/uog.29120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29120","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of interindividual follicular size variation at ovulation in natural-cycle frozen embryo transfer. 评估自然周期冷冻胚胎移植排卵时个体间卵泡大小的变化。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29123
J Edades, E Kalafat, B Ata, R Del Gallego, H Fatemi, B Lawrenz
{"title":"Assessment of interindividual follicular size variation at ovulation in natural-cycle frozen embryo transfer.","authors":"J Edades, E Kalafat, B Ata, R Del Gallego, H Fatemi, B Lawrenz","doi":"10.1002/uog.29123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29123","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142401459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Growing teratoma syndrome after treatment of ovarian immature teratoma: ultrasound images of a very rare condition. 卵巢未成熟畸胎瘤治疗后的畸胎瘤生长综合征:一种非常罕见病症的超声波图像。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29113
L Hovsepyan, A Stepanyan, A Saradyan, N Asilbekyan, L Valentin
{"title":"Growing teratoma syndrome after treatment of ovarian immature teratoma: ultrasound images of a very rare condition.","authors":"L Hovsepyan, A Stepanyan, A Saradyan, N Asilbekyan, L Valentin","doi":"10.1002/uog.29113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29113","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN journal guidelines. 随机对照研究荟萃分析的可信度标准:妇产科杂志指南》。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29118
{"title":"Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN journal guidelines.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/uog.29118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29118","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142362087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MoMo pregnancies, Mo problems: monochorionic monoamniotic triplet pregnancy with conjoined twins. MoMo妊娠 Mo问题:臭名昭著的复杂单绒毛膜单羊膜多胎妊娠。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27628
L Forbes, J L Miller, A A Baschat, C Kanaan, J Gevaerd Martins
{"title":"MoMo pregnancies, Mo problems: monochorionic monoamniotic triplet pregnancy with conjoined twins.","authors":"L Forbes, J L Miller, A A Baschat, C Kanaan, J Gevaerd Martins","doi":"10.1002/uog.27628","DOIUrl":"10.1002/uog.27628","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139991289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined first-trimester screening and invasive diagnostics for atypical chromosomal aberrations: Danish nationwide study of prenatal profiles and detection compared with NIPT. 针对非典型染色体畸变的第一胎筛查和侵入性诊断相结合:丹麦全国产前概况和检测数据与 NIPT 的比较。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27667
K Gadsbøll, I Vogel, S E Kristensen, L H Pedersen, J Hyett, O B Petersen
{"title":"Combined first-trimester screening and invasive diagnostics for atypical chromosomal aberrations: Danish nationwide study of prenatal profiles and detection compared with NIPT.","authors":"K Gadsbøll, I Vogel, S E Kristensen, L H Pedersen, J Hyett, O B Petersen","doi":"10.1002/uog.27667","DOIUrl":"10.1002/uog.27667","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;Our aim was to examine the prenatal profiles of pregnancies affected by an atypical chromosomal aberration, focusing on pathogenic copy-number variants (pCNVs). We also wanted to quantify the performance of combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) and a second-trimester anomaly scan in detecting these aberrations. Finally, we aimed to estimate the consequences of a policy of using non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) rather than invasive testing with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) to manage pregnancies identified as high risk by cFTS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This was a retrospective review of the Danish Fetal Medicine Database of all pregnant women who underwent cFTS and a risk assessment for trisomy 21 between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018. Chromosomal aberrations diagnosed prenatally, postnatally or from fetal tissue following pregnancy loss or termination of pregnancy were identified. Chromosomal aberrations were grouped into one of six categories: triploidy; common trisomy (13, 18 or 21); monosomy X; other sex-chromosome aberration (SCA); pCNV; and rare autosomal trisomy (RAT) or mosaicism. The prevalence of each aberration category was stratified by the individual cFTS markers and trisomy 21 risk estimate, and the size of each pCNV diagnosed by CMA was calculated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;We retrieved data on 565 708 pregnancies, of which 3982 (0.70%) were diagnosed with a fetal chromosomal aberration. cFTS identified 87% of the common trisomies, but it also performed well in identifying triploidies (86%), monosomy X (92%), atypical SCAs (58%) and RATs or mosaicisms (70%). pCNVs comprised 27% (n = 1091) of the chromosomal aberrations diagnosed overall, and the prevalence increased during the study period, as prenatal CMA was increasingly being performed. In pregnancies with a maternal age &lt; 30 years, nuchal translucency (NT) thickness ≤ 95&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; centile, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) ≥ 1 multiple of the median, or trisomy 21 risk of ≤ 1 in 1000, the prevalence of pCNVs exceeded significantly the prevalence of trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Pregnancies affected by a pCNV had significantly increased NT and decreased levels of the maternal biomarkers PAPP-A and β-human chorionic gonadotropin compared with unaffected pregnancies. However, only 23% of these pregnancies screened positive on cFTS and 51% of pCNVs were not detected until after birth. Among high-risk pregnancies, pCNVs comprised 14% of diagnosed aberrations, and when other atypical aberrations were considered, conventional NIPT (screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and monosomy X) would miss 27% of all pathogenic aberrations diagnosed from invasive testing following a high-risk cFTS result. Thus, 1 in 26 pregnancies at high risk following cFTS would be affected by a chromosomal aberration despite a normal result from conventional NIPT. In a contingent screening model using NIPT for the 'intermediate'-risk","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pearl in a shell: peculiar case of fetal ovarian cyst. 贝壳中的珍珠:一例特殊的胎儿卵巢囊肿。
IF 6.1 1区 医学
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27645
E Montaguti, B Petrachi, A Youssef, G Pilu
{"title":"Pearl in a shell: peculiar case of fetal ovarian cyst.","authors":"E Montaguti, B Petrachi, A Youssef, G Pilu","doi":"10.1002/uog.27645","DOIUrl":"10.1002/uog.27645","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140288997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信