{"title":"Correction to 'Role of artificial-intelligence-assisted automated cardiac biometrics in prenatal screening for coarctation of aorta'.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/uog.29156","DOIUrl":"10.1002/uog.29156","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"512"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
P Dicker, S Daly, R M Conroy, F M McAuliffe, M P Geary, J J Morrison, S S Carroll, F D Malone, F M Breathnach
{"title":"Fetal biometry reference ranges derived from prospective twin population and evaluation of adverse perinatal outcome.","authors":"P Dicker, S Daly, R M Conroy, F M McAuliffe, M P Geary, J J Morrison, S S Carroll, F D Malone, F M Breathnach","doi":"10.1002/uog.29190","DOIUrl":"10.1002/uog.29190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ultrasound-derived estimates of fetal size play an integral role in the prenatal management of twin pregnancy. These biometric measurements are conventionally plotted against singleton standards. We sought to establish fetal growth references for abdominal circumference, head circumference, biparietal diameter, femur diaphysis length and estimated fetal weight (EFW) in twin pregnancy. We also aimed to determine whether the performance of a twin fetal growth reference was superior to a singleton reference in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively in the Evaluation of Sonographic Predictors of Restricted growth in Twins (ESPRiT) study, which was conducted at eight academic perinatal centers in Ireland, all with tertiary neonatal intensive care facilities. Only diamniotic twin pregnancies with two live fetuses were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were monoamnionicity, congenital abnormality, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome or previable fetal demise (< 24 weeks' gestation). Using serial ultrasound observations, we applied fractional polynomial multilevel models to derive an equation for fetal centile determination. We compared these centiles with published singleton and twin fetal references, with particular focus on the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) references. Using the last ultrasound examinations before delivery, we determined associations between biometric measures and a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome (intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, sepsis or perinatal death), neonatal intensive care unit admission, preterm delivery (< 34 weeks) and birth-weight discordance ≥ 25%, based on the varied prevalence of these outcomes. We compared our results with the singleton and twin FMF reference ranges and the twin reference of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 948 twin pairs that met the inclusion criteria, 776 (81.9%) dichorionic and 172 (18.1%) monochorionic twin pairs completed the prospective 2-weekly ultrasound surveillance program. Fetal biometric measurements were obtained in 15 274 ultrasound assessments (12 279 in dichorionic and 2995 in monochorionic twin pairs) from serial ultrasound assessments. The median number of ultrasound assessments per pregnancy was 8 (interquartile range, 7-9). Growth trajectories in this cohort were consistent with the FMF and STORK published twin cohorts and notably less consistent with the FMF singleton standard. Compared with the FMF singleton standards, the 50<sup>th</sup> centiles for twins were greater early in pregnancy and lower later in pregnancy for all biometric measures, in both dichorionic and monochorionic twin pregnancies. This crossover","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"436-446"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961106/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143524252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
D A Badr, F Abi-Khalil, C Kadji, N Marroun, A Carlin, M M Cannie, J C Jani
{"title":"Association of magnetic resonance imaging-derived maternal and fetal parameters with shoulder dystocia: matched case-control study.","authors":"D A Badr, F Abi-Khalil, C Kadji, N Marroun, A Carlin, M M Cannie, J C Jani","doi":"10.1002/uog.29210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of fetal body measurements and maternal pelvic measurements obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the incidence of shoulder dystocia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center, case-control study conducted between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients whose delivery was complicated by shoulder dystocia and who underwent fetal MRI in the third trimester were included in the case group. Patients without shoulder dystocia who were delivered normally and who also underwent fetal MRI in the third trimester were included in the control group. Cases of multiple pregnancy, planned or emergency Cesarean delivery, fetal malformation or those with incomplete MRI examination were excluded. The case group was matched with the control group in a 1:2 ratio according to maternal age, maternal body mass index, gestational diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus Type 1 or 2, gestational age at MRI examination, gestational age at birth and birth weight. Shoulder dystocia was defined as per the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and significant shoulder dystocia was defined as shoulder dystocia that was not resolved by the McRoberts' maneuver or suprapubic pressure. The following fetal and maternal measurements were quantified on MRI in both groups by two readers (one experienced and one inexperienced physician) who were blinded to the obstetric outcomes: fetal body volume (FBV), shoulder skin-to-skin distance, interhumeral distance, biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference, obstetric conjugate (OC), sagittal outlet diameter (SOD), coccygeal pelvic outlet (CPO) and maximal transverse diameter (MTD). A stepwise backward logistic regression that included all measurements was performed. The inter-rater reliability of the measurements was estimated using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1843 patients included in the study, there were 63 (3.4%) cases of shoulder dystocia. After matching, the case group comprised 36 patients and the control group comprised 72 patients. Patients who had shoulder dystocia, compared to those without, had higher FBV (P = 0.023), higher shoulder skin-to-skin distance (P = 0.003), lower OC (P = 0.021), lower SOD (P = 0.004), lower CPO (P = 0.045) and lower MTD (P = 0.001) in comparison with those without. The logistic regression model showed that FBV, shoulder skin-to-skin distance, BPD, SOD and MTD were independent predictors of shoulder dystocia. The measurements of interest had moderate to excellent reliability when repeated by an inexperienced reader. In those who had non-significant shoulder dystocia, only shoulder skin-to-skin distance was significantly greater and OC was significantly lower in comparison with the control group, whereas in those who had significant shoulder dystocia, only SOD and MTD were significantly lower","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143731356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Small-for-gestational age according to INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> fetal weight standard misses most pregnancies at risk of stillbirth identified by GROW.","authors":"O Hugh, E Butler, H Ellson, J Mytton, J Gardosi","doi":"10.1002/uog.29214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29214","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143693558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}