Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology最新文献

{"title":"Reply.","authors":"A Deslandes, M Leonardi","doi":"10.1002/uog.29149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29149","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142732939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Management of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestation affected by Type-II selective fetal growth restriction: cost-effectiveness analysis.","authors":"J C Morgan, J Rios, T Kahl, M Prasad, A Rausch, R Longman, S Mehra, A Shaaban, A Premkumar","doi":"10.1002/uog.29135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Monochorionic twin gestations affected by Type-II selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) are at increased risk of intrauterine fetal demise, extreme preterm birth, severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) and neonatal death of one or both twins. In the absence of a consensus on the optimal management strategy, we chose to evaluate which strategy was cost-effective in the setting of Type-II sFGR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A decision-analytic model was used to compare expectant management (EM), bipolar cord occlusion (BCO), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP) for a hypothetical cohort of 10 000 people with a monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy affected by Type-II sFGR. Probabilities and utilities were derived from the literature. Costs were derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and adjusted to 2023 USD. The analytic horizon, taken from the perspective of the pregnant patient, extended throughout the life of the child or children. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 50 000 USD per quality-adjusted life year defined the willingness-to-pay threshold. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For base-case estimates, RFA was the most cost-effective strategy compared with all of the other interventions included, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 14 243 USD per quality-adjusted life year. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the utilities assigned to fetal demise and severe NDI, as well as the costs of preterm birth before 32 weeks, most strongly impacted the model outcomes. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, RFA was the most cost-effective strategy in 78% of runs, followed by BCO at 20%, EM at 2% and FLP in 0% of runs. When compared with EM, RFA led to 58 fewer births before 28 weeks' gestation, 273 fewer cases of severe NDI and 22 more deliveries after 32 weeks. When compared with FLP, RFA resulted in 259 fewer cases of severe NDI and 3177 more births after 32 weeks. When compared with BCO, RFA resulted in 1786 more neurologically intact neonates and 34 fewer cases of severe NDI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On base-case analysis, RFA was found to be the most cost-effective strategy in the management of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies affected by Type-II sFGR. However, these findings were not robust on sensitivity analysis, indicating the potential benefit of BCO and EM. In the absence of large clinical trials, these data should not be taken to guide management. Future studies should evaluate management strategies for Type-II sFGR related to long-term neonatal outcomes, inclusive of quality-of-life indicators, in a prospective multicenter cohort. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perinatal outcomes after selective third-trimester ultrasound screening for small-for-gestational age: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial.","authors":"C Winsloe, J Elhindi, M C Vieira, S Relph, C G Arcus, K Coxon, A Briley, M Johnson, L M Page, A Shennan, N Marlow, C Lees, D A Lawlor, A Khalil, J Sandall, A Copas, D Pasupathy","doi":"10.1002/uog.29130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29130","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;In screening for small-for-gestational age (SGA) using third-trimester antenatal ultrasound, there are concerns about the low detection rates and potential for harm caused by both false-negative and false-positive screening results. Using a selective third-trimester ultrasound screening program, this study aimed to investigate the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes among cases with (i) false-negative compared with true-positive SGA diagnosis and (ii) false-positive compared with true-negative SGA diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This prospective cohort study was nested within the UK-based DESiGN trial, a prospective multicenter cohort study of singleton pregnancies without antenatally detected fetal anomalies, born at &gt; 24 + 0 to &lt; 43 + 0 weeks' gestation. We included women recruited to the baseline period, or control arm, of the trial who were not exposed to the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP) intervention and whose birth outcomes were known. Stillbirth and major neonatal morbidity were the two primary outcomes. Minor neonatal morbidity was considered a secondary outcome. Suspected SGA was defined as an estimated fetal weight (EFW) &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile, based on the Hadlock formula and fetal growth charts. Similarly, SGA at birth was defined as birth weight (BW) &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile, based on UK population references. Maternal and pregnancy characteristics and perinatal outcomes were reported according to whether SGA was suspected antenatally or not. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to quantify the differences in adverse perinatal outcomes between the screening results (false negative vs true positive and false positive vs true negative).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In total, 165 321 pregnancies were included in the analysis. Fetuses with a false-negative SGA screening result, compared to those with a true-positive result, were at a significantly higher risk of stillbirth (adjusted OR (aOR), 1.18 (95% CI, 1.07-1.31)), but at lower risk of major (aOR, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.91)) and minor (aOR, 0.56, (95% CI, 0.54-0.59)) neonatal morbidity. Compared with a true-negative screening result, a false-positive result was associated with a lower BW percentile (median, 18.1 (interquartile range (IQR), 13.3-26.9)) vs 49.9 (IQR, 30.3-71.7)). A false-positive result was also associated with a significantly increased risk of stillbirth (aOR, 2.24 (95% CI, 1.88-2.68)) and minor neonatal morbidity (aOR, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.51-1.71)), but not major neonatal morbidity (aOR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.98-1.09)).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;In selective third-trimester ultrasound screening for SGA, both false-negative and false-positive results were associated with a significantly higher risk of stillbirth, when compared with true-positive and true-negative results, respectively. Improved SGA detection is needed to address false-negative results. It should be acknowledged that ca","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142717174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Routine 36-week scan: prediction of small-for-gestational- age neonate.","authors":"S Adjahou, A Syngelaki, M Nanda, D Papavasileiou, R Akolekar, K H Nicolaides","doi":"10.1002/uog.29134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29134","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;First, to compare the predictive performance of routine ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) at 31 + 0 to 33 + 6 and 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation for delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate. Second, to compare the predictive performance of EFW at 36 weeks' gestation for SGA vs fetal growth restriction (FGR) at birth. Third, to compare the predictive performance for delivery of a SGA neonate of EFW &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile vs a model combining maternal demographic characteristics and elements of medical history with EFW.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in 21 676 women with a singleton pregnancy who had undergone routine ultrasound examination at 31 + 0 to 33 + 6 weeks' gestation and 107 875 women with a singleton pregnancy who had undergone routine ultrasound examination at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks. Measurements of fetal head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length were used to calculate EFW according to the Hadlock formula and this was expressed as a percentile according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts. The same charts were used to diagnose SGA neonates with birth weight &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; or &lt; 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt; percentile. FGR was defined as birth weight &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile in addition to Doppler anomalies. For each gestational-age window at screening, the screen-positive rate and detection rate were calculated at different EFW cut-offs between the 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; and 50&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentiles for predicting the delivery of a SGA neonate with birth weight &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; or &lt; 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt; percentile, either within 2 weeks or at any time after assessment. The areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves (AUC) of screening for a SGA neonate by EFW at 31 + 0 to 33 + 6 weeks and at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks were compared.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The predictive performance of routine ultrasonographic examination during the third trimester for delivery of a SGA neonate is higher if: first, the scan is carried out at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation rather than at 31 + 0 to 33 + 6 weeks; second, the outcome measure is birth weight &lt; 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt; rather than &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile; third, the outcome measure is FGR rather than SGA; fourth, if delivery occurs within 2 weeks after assessment rather than at any time after assessment; and fifth, prediction is performed using a model that combines maternal demographic characteristics and elements of medical history with EFW rather than EFW &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile alone. At 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation, detection of ≥ 85% of SGA neonates with birth weight &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile born at any time after assessment necessitates the use of EFW &lt; 40&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile. Screening at this percentile cut-off predicted 95% and 98% of neonates with birth weight &lt; 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/su","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142717177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prediction of vesicouterine adhesions by transvaginal sonographic sliding sign technique: validation study.","authors":"N Min, J van Keizerswaard, R H Visser, N B Burger, J W T Rake, J W M Aarts, T van den Bosch, M Leonardi, J A F Huirne, R A de Leeuw","doi":"10.1002/uog.29128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29128","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Adhesions between the uterus, bladder and anterior abdominal wall are associated with clinical sequelae, including chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia, and can also yield complications during surgery. The transvaginal sonographic (TVS) sliding bladder sign is a minimally invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate the presence of vesicouterine adhesions. This study aimed to determine the predictive value and intra- and interobserver variation of the TVS sliding bladder sign in the assessment of vesicouterine adhesions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This was a prospective observational double-blind diagnostic accuracy study conducted at the Amsterdam University Medical Center. Patients scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery for a benign disorder between January 2020 and December 2022 were included consecutively. All patients underwent preoperative TVS, including a dynamic sliding bladder sign examination in our outpatient clinic. Videoclips of the TVS scans were stored for offline assessment and used as an index test. The recordings of both TVS and laparoscopy were evaluated for diagnostic characteristics of vesicouterine adhesions by independent assessors, who were blinded to the clinical situation in addition to the laparoscopic findings when assessing recordings of TVS and vice versa. The presence of adhesions on laparoscopy was used as the reference standard. The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), specificity and sensitivity of the sliding bladder sign were calculated. In addition, inter- and intraobserver variability of the sliding bladder sign on TVS were assessed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 116 included women, 57 had a negative sliding bladder sign on TVS, while on laparoscopy, 51 women had mild and 28 had severe vesicouterine adhesions. A negative sliding bladder sign had a PPV of 94.7% (95% CI, 88.9-100%) for the presence of any vesicouterine adhesions, and a positive sliding bladder sign had a specificity of 91.9% (95% CI, 83.1-100%). For severe adhesions, the negative sliding bladder sign had a sensitivity of 89.3% (95% CI, 77.8-100%) and a positive sliding bladder sign had a NPV of 94.9% (95% CI, 89.3-100%). When using Cohen's kappa coefficient, inter- and intraobserver agreement between assessors was good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Sliding bladder sign evaluation using TVS is a reliable diagnostic tool for the prediction of vesicouterine adhesions on laparoscopy. A negative sliding bladder sign indicates the presence of vesicouterine adhesions, while a positive sliding bladder sign makes the presence of severe adhesions unlikely. Establishing vesicouterine adhesions by TVS may optimize preoperative planning, and can be used for future studies to evaluate the relationship between symptomatology and vesicouterine adhesions and, subsequently, the effect of adhesion-prevention interventions. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology publis","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142717175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Congenital heart defects during COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"A Khalil, I Painter, V Souter","doi":"10.1002/uog.29126","DOIUrl":"10.1002/uog.29126","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ultrasound assessment of lymph nodes for staging of gynecological cancer: consensus opinion on terminology and examination technique.","authors":"D Fischerova, E Gatti, C Culcasi, Z Ng, G Szabó, L Zanchi, A Burgetova, O Nanka, G Gambino, M R Kadajari, G Garganese","doi":"10.1002/uog.29127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29127","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lymphatic pathway is an important route of metastasis in gynecological malignancy. Therefore, the examination of lymph nodes is an essential part of the ultrasound evaluation in patients with known or suspected gynecological malignancy. The lymph nodes most frequently involved in gynecological malignancy (apart from vulvar cancer) are parietal (retroperitoneal) and visceral abdominopelvic lymph nodes. In advanced disease, more distant lymph-node regions, such as the inguinal, axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes, can also be involved. The standardized description of lymph nodes has been published previously by the Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) collaborative group. Herein, a collaborative group of gynecologists and gynecological oncologists with extensive ultrasound experience presents a systematic methodology for ultrasonographic lymph-node assessment performed as part of the locoregional and distant work-up to assess the extent of gynecological malignancy. The aim of this consensus opinion is also to describe the anatomical classification and drainage pathways of the lymphatic system as relevant to the gynecological organs. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comprehensive prenatal ultrasound for surgical risk assessment: differentiating placenta accreta spectrum from uterine scar dehiscence for improved clinical decision-making.","authors":"R A Aryananda, T K Adu-Bredu","doi":"10.1002/uog.29138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29138","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ultrasound assessment of the pelvic sidewall: methodological consensus opinion.","authors":"D Fischerova, C Culcasi, E Gatti, Z Ng, A Burgetova, G Szabó","doi":"10.1002/uog.29122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A standardized methodology for the ultrasound evaluation of the pelvic sidewall has not been proposed to date. Herein, a collaborative group of gynecologists and gynecological oncologists with extensive ultrasound experience presents a systematic methodology for the ultrasonographic evaluation of structures within the pelvic sidewall. Five categories of anatomical structures are described (muscles, vessels, lymph nodes, nerves and ureters). A step-by-step transvaginal ultrasound (or, when this is not feasible, transrectal ultrasound) approach is outlined for the evaluation of each anatomical landmark within these categories. Accurate assessment of the pelvic sidewall using a standardized approach improves the detection and diagnosis of non-gynecological pathologies that may mimic gynecological tumors, reducing the risk of unnecessary and even harmful intervention. Furthermore, it plays an important role in completing the staging of malignant gynecological conditions. Transvaginal or transrectal ultrasound therefore represents a viable alternative to magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of lesions affecting the pelvic sidewall, if performed by an expert sonographer. A series of videoclips showing normal and abnormal findings within each respective category illustrates how establishing a universally applicable approach for evaluating this crucial region will be helpful for assessing both benign and malignant conditions affecting the pelvic sidewall. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142584403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Association between adenomyosis volume and adverse perinatal outcomes: multicenter cohort study.","authors":"X Ni, X Su, Y Shi, P Ru, Y Liu, S Lei, Y Gu, M Liu, T Duan","doi":"10.1002/uog.29108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29108","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the association between adenomyosis volume, as a reflection of its severity, and the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at a comprehensive tertiary care institution and a tertiary maternal and child healthcare hospital, which are the main types of hospital providing maternal medical care in China. The study included pregnant women without adenomyosis (non-AD cohort) who delivered between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021, and women with pregnancy complicated by adenomyosis (AD cohort) who delivered between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022. Adenomyosis was diagnosed and measured using transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound up to 14 weeks of gestation. The adenomyosis volume (V) was calculated based on the sonographic measurement of three dimensions, using the formula V = (length × width × thickness) × 4/3π. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between adenomyosis and the risk of pregnancy complications. We also performed a sensitivity analysis among 226 pregnancies complicated by adenomyosis that had volume measurements available and 10 507 pregnancies without adenomyosis, using as a threshold for severe adenomyosis the 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt; quartile of adenomyosis volume.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The study group included 10 507 pregnant women in the non-AD cohort and 321 in the AD cohort. Pregnancies complicated by adenomyosis had an increased risk of preterm birth &lt; 37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.39 (95% CI, 1.65-3.48)), spontaneous preterm birth &lt; 37 weeks of gestation (aOR, 2.57 (95% CI, 1.54-4.28)), placenta previa (aOR, 2.57 (95% CI, 1.41-4.67)), cervical incompetence (aOR, 9.70 (95% CI, 4.00-23.55)) and abnormal fetal presentation (aOR, 2.04 (95% CI, 1.39-3.00)), and there was also a non-significant trend toward increased risk of pre-eclampsia (aOR, 1.64 (95% CI, 0.94-2.85)). Sensitivity analysis revealed there was a greater risk in pregnancies with severe (≥ 757.5 cm&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;) vs mild adenomyosis of preterm birth &lt; 37 weeks of gestation (aOR, 5.50 (95% CI, 2.80-10.82) vs aOR, 1.73 (95% CI, 0.98-3.05)), pre-eclampsia (aOR, 4.94 (95% CI, 2.11-11.58) vs aOR, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.41-2.58)), placenta previa (aOR, 6.37 (95% CI, 2.39-17.04) vs aOR, 1.58 (95% CI, 0.60-4.19)) and cervical incompetence (aOR, 12.79 (95% CI, 2.87-56.93) vs aOR, 4.97 (95% CI, 1.25-19.77)) compared to pregnancies without adenomyosis. The risk of spontaneous preterm birth &lt; 37 weeks and the risk of abnormal fetal presentation was similar between the two subgroups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Pregnancies complicated by adenomyosis, particularly those with severe adenomyosis, have an increased risk of pregnancy complications, including preterm birth, spontaneous preterm birth, placenta previa, cervical incompetence and abnormal fetal presentation. © ","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"64 5","pages":"678-686"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142558798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}