Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy: international Delphi consensus.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1002/uog.29220
H J Mustafa, J Sheikh, V Berghella, W A Grobman, A A Shamshirsaz, S J Gordijn, W Ganzevoort, A Roman, A Khalil
{"title":"Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy: international Delphi consensus.","authors":"H J Mustafa, J Sheikh, V Berghella, W A Grobman, A A Shamshirsaz, S J Gordijn, W Ganzevoort, A Roman, A Khalil","doi":"10.1002/uog.29220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use the Delphi method to gain insight into approaches to prenatal diagnosis and management of preterm birth (PTB) in twin pregnancies, including complications such as twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and a short and/or dilated cervix.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi process was conducted among an international panel of experts to assess their approach to prevention, monitoring and management strategies for PTB in twin pregnancies. Experts were selected based on their publication record or membership of related organizations. Response options were multiple-choice answers or a five-point Likert scale. A priori, a cut-off of ≥ 70% agreement was used to define consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 experts participated in the first round, of whom 94/117 (80.3%) completed all subsequent rounds. Representatives came from at least 22 countries (across five continents), most commonly the USA (50.4%) and the UK (12.0%). Over 70% of experts performed routine screening of cervical length (CL) using transvaginal ultrasound at 18-23 weeks' gestation, using CL ≤ 25 mm to diagnose short cervix in twin pregnancies, regardless of a history of PTB. In twin pregnancies with a short non-dilated cervix, most experts offered vaginal progesterone rather than pessary or cervical cerclage, regardless of a history of PTB. In twin pregnancies with asymptomatic dilated cervix, consensus was reached (88.3% agreement) for placement of cervical cerclage, performed up to 24 weeks' gestation (67.5% agreement; no consensus). Similarly, 96.1% of experts agreed that performing serial transvaginal ultrasound measurements of CL at 16-24 weeks' gestation was warranted in women with a current singleton pregnancy who had a previous twin pregnancy that required physical examination-indicated cerclage; these patients should be considered high risk for PTB (83.1% agreement). In twin pregnancies with TTTS, laser surgery is offered by most experts, regardless of preoperative CL. In patients with TTTS and short CL, most experts would recommend cervical cerclage (71.9%) or vaginal progesterone (65.6%) rather than pessary or expectant management. However, no consensus was reached on measures to prevent PTB in cases of TTTS with cervical dilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This Delphi consensus study highlights practice variations among healthcare providers worldwide in the evaluation and management of PTB in twin pregnancies, which often differ from recommendations given by national and international societies. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"712-722"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29220","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To use the Delphi method to gain insight into approaches to prenatal diagnosis and management of preterm birth (PTB) in twin pregnancies, including complications such as twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and a short and/or dilated cervix.

Methods: A three-round Delphi process was conducted among an international panel of experts to assess their approach to prevention, monitoring and management strategies for PTB in twin pregnancies. Experts were selected based on their publication record or membership of related organizations. Response options were multiple-choice answers or a five-point Likert scale. A priori, a cut-off of ≥ 70% agreement was used to define consensus.

Results: A total of 117 experts participated in the first round, of whom 94/117 (80.3%) completed all subsequent rounds. Representatives came from at least 22 countries (across five continents), most commonly the USA (50.4%) and the UK (12.0%). Over 70% of experts performed routine screening of cervical length (CL) using transvaginal ultrasound at 18-23 weeks' gestation, using CL ≤ 25 mm to diagnose short cervix in twin pregnancies, regardless of a history of PTB. In twin pregnancies with a short non-dilated cervix, most experts offered vaginal progesterone rather than pessary or cervical cerclage, regardless of a history of PTB. In twin pregnancies with asymptomatic dilated cervix, consensus was reached (88.3% agreement) for placement of cervical cerclage, performed up to 24 weeks' gestation (67.5% agreement; no consensus). Similarly, 96.1% of experts agreed that performing serial transvaginal ultrasound measurements of CL at 16-24 weeks' gestation was warranted in women with a current singleton pregnancy who had a previous twin pregnancy that required physical examination-indicated cerclage; these patients should be considered high risk for PTB (83.1% agreement). In twin pregnancies with TTTS, laser surgery is offered by most experts, regardless of preoperative CL. In patients with TTTS and short CL, most experts would recommend cervical cerclage (71.9%) or vaginal progesterone (65.6%) rather than pessary or expectant management. However, no consensus was reached on measures to prevent PTB in cases of TTTS with cervical dilation.

Conclusions: This Delphi consensus study highlights practice variations among healthcare providers worldwide in the evaluation and management of PTB in twin pregnancies, which often differ from recommendations given by national and international societies. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

双胎妊娠预防早产:国际德尔菲共识。
目的:采用德尔菲法探讨双胎妊娠早产(PTB)的产前诊断和处理方法,包括双胎输血综合征(TTTS)和宫颈短和/或宫颈扩张等并发症。方法:在一个国际专家小组中进行了三轮德尔菲过程,以评估他们对双胎妊娠PTB的预防、监测和管理策略的方法。专家是根据他们的出版记录或相关组织的成员资格来选择的。回答选项为多项选择题或李克特五分制。先验地,一致度≥70%的临界值被用来定义共识。结果:共有117名专家参加了第一轮评审,其中94/117人(80.3%)完成了后续的所有评审。代表来自至少22个国家(横跨五大洲),最常见的是美国(50.4%)和英国(12.0%)。超过70%的专家在妊娠18-23周使用经阴道超声进行宫颈长度(CL)常规筛查,使用CL≤25 mm诊断双胎妊娠宫颈短,无论是否有PTB病史。对于短宫颈未扩张的双胎妊娠,无论是否有PTB病史,大多数专家都会提供阴道黄体酮而不是子宫内膜或宫颈环扎术。在无症状宫颈扩张的双胎妊娠中,达成共识(88.3%同意)放置宫颈环扎术,直至妊娠24周(67.5%同意;没有共识)。同样,96.1%的专家同意,在妊娠16-24周时,对当前单胎妊娠、曾有双胎妊娠且需要体格检查提示有结扎的妇女进行连续阴道超声检查是有必要的;这些患者应被认为是PTB的高风险患者(83.1%同意)。对于患有TTTS的双胎妊娠,大多数专家都提供激光手术,无论术前CL如何。对于TTTS和短期CL患者,大多数专家会推荐宫颈环扎术(71.9%)或阴道黄体酮(65.6%),而不是子宫内膜或预期治疗。然而,在TTTS伴宫颈扩张的病例中预防肺结核的措施上没有达成共识。结论:德尔菲共识研究强调了世界各地医疗服务提供者在评估和管理双胎妊娠肺结核方面的实践差异,这些差异通常与国家和国际社会给出的建议不同。©2025作者。妇产科学超声由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表国际妇产科学超声学会出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信