{"title":"On Adams on the Nature of Moral Obligation","authors":"S. Kazemi Oskooei","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.4.297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.4.297","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133029223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Originality of Existence as a Criterion of Moral Goodness in Sadra's Philosophy","authors":"R. Sadeghi","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.4.311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.4.311","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128358989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Evaluating Wright and Noonan's Externalist Arguments against Skepticism","authors":"H. Alaeinejad","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.2.105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.2.105","url":null,"abstract":"not a brain in a vat, but without the use of any auxiliary premises, they can not prove that we are not brains in a vat; (2) Contrary to Wright’s claim, this premise of his argument that In BIVese, “brain-in-a-vat” does not refer to brains-in-a-vat, and its result, that is, that my language is not BIVese, lead his argument to be epistemically circular; and (3) Noonan’s attempt to avoid epistemic circularity has not led to the desired result, and his argument, like Wright’s, is epistemically circular.","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124370147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comparison of the Ash'ari and Mulla Sadra Views in the rule that Says \"There is No Effect on the Existence Except Allah\"","authors":"Y. Noormohamadi Najaf Abadi","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.3.223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.3.223","url":null,"abstract":". But each has offered a different interpretation of this rule; According to this rule, the Ash’arites have denied any causation, influence, or effect among the possibilities, and attribute all actions exclusively and directly to God Almighty. But Mulla Sadra, based on his philosophical principles in transcendent wisdom, while proving the near activity of God for all actions, also accepts a role for other possibilities in actions and proves a kind of influence and effect among the obligatory sub-transcendence. In this article, with a descriptive-analytical-critical method, both views in this regard were examined. Accordingly, neither view is flawed. Of course, Mulla Sadra’s view, with the explanation given by Mullah Ali Modarres, is largely free from problems.","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125129793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Inconsistency in Science; an Argument for the Possibility of the Paraconsistent Philosophy of Science","authors":"K. Farsian","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.3.269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.3.269","url":null,"abstract":"theories (Empirical or Non-Empirical), and by this I will try to open the door for the possibility of the paraconsistent philosophy of science.","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131997581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Ontological and Axiological Position of Tuche or Fortune in Aristotle's View","authors":"M. Samadieh","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.3.237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.3.237","url":null,"abstract":"intention. Aristotle believes that fortune-based affairs are subjects of intention and intellection which emerge from those agents who can take volitional actions. At the same time, he introduced fortune as an anti-rule and instable affair with indeterminate and purposeless causes. He accepted the existence of fortune even in the domain of the actions related to Techne and human happiness. However, he does not attach any value to it in axiology and declares it to be a cause by accident that comes after nature and intellect, even believing that there is no knowledge for it. Moreover, it is valueless in the domain of the action related to human happiness.","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123510504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Problem of Evil and Monotheistic Horizons Ahead","authors":"Q. Qorbani","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.3.191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.3.191","url":null,"abstract":"of the infinite God’s activity on one side of the equation of the problem of evil, the most logical solution is to use the total of possible answers in a combined and unified way, because the combination of the existing ways brings closer to the answer and is more convincing in this context. Therefore, while paying attention to the differences between the metaphysical, natural and moral evils from each other, combining answers such as the relativity of evil, evil as a necessity of human free will, seeing evil as a punishment for human sins, evil as the cause of human spiritual excellence, and seeing the world of the hereafter and the importance of the eternal perspective are needed as the final manifestation of the evil philosophy.","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123038243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Against Dicopulaism in Meinongian Tradition","authors":"H. Hamtaii, S. Hojjati","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.3.249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.3.249","url":null,"abstract":"Is Meinongian dicopulation justified? This is the main problem in this paper and our hypothesis is that Meinongian dicopulaism is counterintuitive. This is despite the rich list of syntactic and semantic features that Meinongian advocates of the double copula strategy attribute to the Meinongian (internal/encoding) mode of predication in contrast with the ordinary mode of predication. That is what we demonstrate in this paper. We argue that neither of the requirement that Meinongian formulas (i","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115903794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Social Trust Based on Islamic Ethics; View of Imam Moussa Sadr","authors":"Gh. Zakyani","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.2.157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.2.157","url":null,"abstract":"Politics and Education) for some reason it was out of the question, and it was pushed to the field of theologians and limited to the topics of prophecy and Imamate. In the modern age, the issues of moral philosophy have been at the center of philosophical issues, muslim scholars have sought to consolidate moral principles. There was three streams: Tabatabaei (a Creditable Perceptions), Motahhari (Rational good (Hosn) and evil (Ghobh) and transcendental ego), Sadr (a social approach to ethics). In this article, meanwhile refer to the aforementioned history, we introduce and analysis Sadr’s perspective to ethics. Sadr is a thinker who, while familiar with Islamic philosophy, has never been confined to it. He went to solve social problems, including the foundations of ethics, to the Quran and Sunnah with free approach, and he laid a divine-social basis (public trust) for ethics.","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125834181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Determining the Metaphor of “the Mind as a Computer” and Criticizing its Implications in Education","authors":"H. Karon Beirag","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.2.175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.2.175","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131120214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}