“除真主外无影响”规则中阿什阿里与穆拉萨德拉观点的比较

Y. Noormohamadi Najaf Abadi
{"title":"“除真主外无影响”规则中阿什阿里与穆拉萨德拉观点的比较","authors":"Y. Noormohamadi Najaf Abadi","doi":"10.58209/jpt.2.3.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". But each has offered a different interpretation of this rule; According to this rule, the Ash’arites have denied any causation, influence, or effect among the possibilities, and attribute all actions exclusively and directly to God Almighty. But Mulla Sadra, based on his philosophical principles in transcendent wisdom, while proving the near activity of God for all actions, also accepts a role for other possibilities in actions and proves a kind of influence and effect among the obligatory sub-transcendence. In this article, with a descriptive-analytical-critical method, both views in this regard were examined. Accordingly, neither view is flawed. Of course, Mulla Sadra’s view, with the explanation given by Mullah Ali Modarres, is largely free from problems.","PeriodicalId":219243,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Thought","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Ash'ari and Mulla Sadra Views in the rule that Says \\\"There is No Effect on the Existence Except Allah\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Y. Noormohamadi Najaf Abadi\",\"doi\":\"10.58209/jpt.2.3.223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". But each has offered a different interpretation of this rule; According to this rule, the Ash’arites have denied any causation, influence, or effect among the possibilities, and attribute all actions exclusively and directly to God Almighty. But Mulla Sadra, based on his philosophical principles in transcendent wisdom, while proving the near activity of God for all actions, also accepts a role for other possibilities in actions and proves a kind of influence and effect among the obligatory sub-transcendence. In this article, with a descriptive-analytical-critical method, both views in this regard were examined. Accordingly, neither view is flawed. Of course, Mulla Sadra’s view, with the explanation given by Mullah Ali Modarres, is largely free from problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Thought\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.3.223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.2.3.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 但每个人都对这条规则给出了不同的解释;根据这一规则,阿什阿里特否认任何因果关系,影响,或影响之间的可能性,并将所有的行动完全和直接归因于全能的上帝。而穆拉·萨德拉则以他的超验智慧哲学原则为基础,在证明上帝对一切行为的接近活动的同时,也接受了其他可能性在行为中的作用,并在强制性的次超验中证明了一种影响和效果。在这篇文章中,用描述-分析-批判的方法,这两种观点在这方面进行了检查。因此,这两种观点都没有缺陷。当然,穆拉·萨德拉的观点,加上毛拉阿里·莫达雷斯的解释,基本上没有问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Ash'ari and Mulla Sadra Views in the rule that Says "There is No Effect on the Existence Except Allah"
. But each has offered a different interpretation of this rule; According to this rule, the Ash’arites have denied any causation, influence, or effect among the possibilities, and attribute all actions exclusively and directly to God Almighty. But Mulla Sadra, based on his philosophical principles in transcendent wisdom, while proving the near activity of God for all actions, also accepts a role for other possibilities in actions and proves a kind of influence and effect among the obligatory sub-transcendence. In this article, with a descriptive-analytical-critical method, both views in this regard were examined. Accordingly, neither view is flawed. Of course, Mulla Sadra’s view, with the explanation given by Mullah Ali Modarres, is largely free from problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信