Psychological review最新文献_第2页

The two ontologies of person-organization fit. 个人与组织契合的两个本体。

IF 5.7 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-08-27 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000650

Jon Billsberry

{"title":"The two ontologies of person-organization fit.","authors":"Jon Billsberry","doi":"10.1037/rev0000650","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rev0000650","url":null,"abstract":"Person-organization (PO) fit turns on the idea of compatibility between people and organizations, but fit research has typically approached compatibility through a limited set of assumptions. Most PO fit research adopts a correspondence ontology, treating fit as a measurable alignment between individual traits and features of the organization. Drawing on constructivist psychology and interpretivist theory, this article distinguishes the established correspondence ontology of PO fit, expressed as aligned fit, from a constitutive ontology, expressed as constructed fit. I argue that PO fit theory rests on two distinct and often unacknowledged ontologies, each with its own epistemological foundations and methodological implications. Correspondence-based approaches explain fit as attribute alignment between person and organization, whereas constitutive approaches explain fit as the lived capacity to sustain a workable sense of self in organizational life through interpretation, identity work, and affective experience. A process model is developed for each ontology, illustrating how they generate distinct explanatory pathways linking organizational participation, experience, and outcomes. Recognizing these ontological differences allows researchers to specify more precisely what their studies seek to explain when they invoke the language of fit. The article advances a pluralist research agenda that preserves theoretical coherence while expanding the explanatory scope of fit research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148840591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A comparison of single and multiple diffusion process models of continuous-outcome decision making. 连续结果决策的单一和多个扩散过程模型的比较。

IF 5.7 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-07-30 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000635

Philip L Smith, Paul M Garrett, Daniel Feuerriegel, Jane Yook, Simon D Lilburn

{"title":"A comparison of single and multiple diffusion process models of continuous-outcome decision making.","authors":"Philip L Smith, Paul M Garrett, Daniel Feuerriegel, Jane Yook, Simon D Lilburn","doi":"10.1037/rev0000635","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rev0000635","url":null,"abstract":"Continuous-outcome decision tasks, in which responses are made on continuous scales, are increasingly used to characterize the processes involved in speeded decision making. These tasks yield entire distributions of response errors rather than just error proportions. Two diffusion process models of continuous-outcome decisions have recently been proposed, the circular diffusion model, and the spatially continuous diffusion model, which generalize the two main classes of diffusion process models of two-choice decisions to continuous spaces. The circular diffusion model, which generalizes the two-boundary Wiener model, assumes evidence is accumulated by a two-dimensional Wiener process with a vector-valued drift rate on the interior of a disk, whose bounding circle represents the decision criterion. The spatially continuous diffusion model, which generalizes the class of multiple accumulator models, assumes evidence is accumulated by a Gaussian random process with a function-valued drift rate to a criterion. We compared the ability of the models to account for the distributions of errors and response times on three perceptual tasks that manipulated both the kind and the amount of evidence entering the decision process, which produced qualitatively different patterns of response times and errors. Despite some differences in their predicted joint distributions, both models generally provided good accounts of performance in all three tasks. Our findings reinforce and extend findings from two-choice studies showing that diffusive evidence processes and not model architecture are the main determinants of successful model performance, and show the theoretical unity of diffusion models across different domains. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148631319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Inferring the causes of noise from binary outcomes: A normative theory of learning under uncertainty. 从二元结果中推断噪声的原因：不确定性下学习的规范理论。

IF 5.7 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-07-30 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000638

Xiaotong Fang, Payam Piray

{"title":"Inferring the causes of noise from binary outcomes: A normative theory of learning under uncertainty.","authors":"Xiaotong Fang, Payam Piray","doi":"10.1037/rev0000638","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rev0000638","url":null,"abstract":"Inferring the true cause of noise-distinguishing between volatility (environmental change) and stochasticity (outcome randomness)-is essential for learning in noisy environments. While most studies rely on binary outcomes, previous models are designed for continuous outcome and use ad hoc approximations to handle binary data, introducing theoretical inconsistencies and interpretational issues. Here, we develop a normative framework for inferring the causes of noise from binary feedback that remains faithful to the discrete nature of the generative process and underlying statistical structure. First, we establish a generative model using a state space approach tailored for binary outcomes and derive the corresponding hidden Markov model inference procedure. Second, we introduce a computational model combining the hidden Markov model with particle filtering to simultaneously infer volatility and stochasticity from binary outcomes. Third, we validate predictions through a 2 × 2 probabilistic reversal-learning task with human participants, systematically manipulating both noise parameters. Results show that participants adjust their learning rates consistent with model predictions, increasing learning rates under volatile conditions and decreasing them under high stochasticity. Our theoretical and experimental results offer a principled approach for dissociating volatility and stochasticity from binary outcomes, providing insights into learning processes relevant to typical cognition and psychiatric conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13425944/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148631118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Using the dynamics of children's reaching to examine the role of inhibitory control in social cognitive development. 利用儿童伸手的动态来考察抑制控制在社会认知发展中的作用。

IF 5.7 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-07-27 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000641

David M Sobel

{"title":"Using the dynamics of children's reaching to examine the role of inhibitory control in social cognitive development.","authors":"David M Sobel","doi":"10.1037/rev0000641","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rev0000641","url":null,"abstract":"Numerous studies in cognitive development have examined the relation between children's developing inhibitory control and their social cognition, including false belief, selective trust, and children's understanding of fairness norms. This research typically finds correlations between performance on inhibitory control measures and developmental milestones in social cognitive development, such as success on false belief measures, actively recognizing deceptive agents, and rejecting advantageous inequities. These studies, however, do not describe the role of inhibitory control as children are making these social cognitive inferences. We use reach trajectory tracking-a method commonly used with adults-to isolate the role of distinct inhibitory control mechanisms as children make such inferences. After describing this method, we present three case studies that describe how different inhibitory mechanisms are involved in understanding others' false beliefs, selective learning from human versus nonhuman stimuli, and making inferences about fair resource distributions. Taken together, these studies suggest that different inhibitory mechanisms relate to social evaluations about other people as opposed to evaluations of the information generated by others. Further, reach trajectory tracking offers a natural way of studying the role of inhibitory control in cognitive development, as children are making decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148593061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Risk matters less when options are apples-to-oranges: The translate-and-accommodate model. 当选择从苹果到橙子时，风险就不那么重要了：翻译和适应模型。

IF 5.4 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-07-23 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000633

Evan Weingarten,Yuval Rottenstreich,George Wu

{"title":"Risk matters less when options are apples-to-oranges: The translate-and-accommodate model.","authors":"Evan Weingarten,Yuval Rottenstreich,George Wu","doi":"10.1037/rev0000633","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000633","url":null,"abstract":"Risk aversion for moderate-likelihood gains is perhaps the best-known stylized fact from decision research. Though studies documenting it have focused on decisions involving money, such behavior is presumed to prevail very generally, across diverse domains. We investigate the validity of this generalization by contrasting two types of decisions. In unimodal choices, outcomes are \"apples-to-apples.\" Consider choosing between sure and uncertain monetary payoffs, or between sure receipt of a product and a chance at several units of it. In crossmodal choices, outcomes are \"apples-to-oranges.\" Consider choosing between sure receipt of one product and uncertain receipt of a disparate product. We observe two patterns by which risk matters less crossmodally, contrary to straightforward generalizations. First, relative to unimodal preferences involving actuarially fair risky options, corresponding crossmodal preferences exhibit less risk aversion. Second, crossmodal preferences vary less across risk levels: As the likelihood and subjective value of a risky option's outcomes become increasingly unfavorable (favorable), people do not exhibit as much additional distaste (appetite) for it. These patterns of insensitivity engender an interaction: relative to unimodal settings, crossmodal settings yield less aversion to unfavorable and fair risk but more aversion to favorable risk. To explain this interaction, we present the translate-and-accommodate model, in which unimodal preferences follow standard accounts, but crossmodal preferences reflect processes of (a) deterministic translation and (b) risk accommodation. The translate-and-accommodate model also explains the uncertainty effect and related patterns of seemingly bizarre, dominated choices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148565039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Famine, plague, and slaughters: The fleeing famine hypothesis of anorexia nervosa reconsidered. 饥荒、瘟疫和屠杀：重新考虑神经性厌食症的逃离饥荒假说。

IF 5.7 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-07-20 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000643

Nikhila S Udupa, Mina Velimirović, Morgan Robison, Mary E Duffy, Thomas E Joiner

{"title":"Famine, plague, and slaughters: The fleeing famine hypothesis of anorexia nervosa reconsidered.","authors":"Nikhila S Udupa, Mina Velimirović, Morgan Robison, Mary E Duffy, Thomas E Joiner","doi":"10.1037/rev0000643","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rev0000643","url":null,"abstract":"The fleeing famine hypothesis (FFH) posits that a genetically and evolutionarily based predisposition for food restriction and hyperactivity is activated among susceptible humans and nonhumans upon experiencing a prolonged energy deficit. Such circumstances manifest in the counterintuitive responses to starvation that are characteristic of anorexia nervosa: continued dietary restriction, denial of declining physical state, and, in at least a subset of those with anorexia nervosa, increased motor activity. We consider the nine predictions derived by Guisinger (2003) in her original formulation of the FFH and evaluate the evidence regarding each, including, of course, evidence that has accumulated subsequent to the 2003 statement of the model. We further expand upon Guisinger's original hypothesis by addressing apparent contradictions, outlining important directions for future research, and discussing the clinical implications of the FFH. We conclude that the relevant literature is unsurprisingly imperfect but that, with a number of reconsiderations, the FFH has substantial explanatory scope. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13390780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148520889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Talking the talk, not walking the walk: The coevolution of overconfidence and loss aversion. 只说不做：过度自信和损失厌恶的共同进化。

IF 5.7 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-07-20 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000644

Chris Dawson, David de Meza

{"title":"Talking the talk, not walking the walk: The coevolution of overconfidence and loss aversion.","authors":"Chris Dawson, David de Meza","doi":"10.1037/rev0000644","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rev0000644","url":null,"abstract":"A puzzle for evolutionary theory is the existence of two seemingly offsetting behavioral \"biases,\" overconfidence and loss aversion. Overconfidence is a call to action, while loss aversion curbs initiative. The most prominent evolutionary explanation of overconfidence, proposed by Trivers (1976), is that self-deceit arises to better deceive others. Missing from this account is why sincere messages are believed, especially given the widespread prevalence of self-deception. Moreover, if overconfidence is adaptive, why is it at least partially canceled by loss aversion? We propose a signaling theory according to which the role of self-deception is to better inform others. Since the decision error associated with high self-belief is less burdensome for the more able, and the benefit of being perceived as able increases with ability, hardwired overconfidence is a credible signal of true ability. Evidence supports this interpretation. A further implication of signaling is that loss aversion is part of the equilibrium. It partially ameliorates the decision costs of overconfidence, but as it is usually hidden, it does not eliminate its signaling role. \"Biases\" are thus symbiotic-the payoff to agents from an integrated set of biases is higher than would be the case in their absence. From this perspective, Kahneman's advice that individuals eliminate both overconfidence and loss aversion is poorly founded. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148520927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Risk Matters Less When Options Are Apples-to-Oranges: The Translate-and-Accommodate Model 当选择从苹果到橙子：翻译和调整模型时，风险的补充材料就不那么重要了

IF 5.4 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-07-16 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000633.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Talking the Talk, Not Walking the Walk: The Coevolution of Overconfidence and Loss Aversion 说到做到：过度自信和损失厌恶的共同进化

IF 5.4 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-07-16 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000644.supp

引用次数: 0

Beyond synchrony: Why disengagement can sometimes be the healthiest choice. 超越同步：为什么脱离接触有时是最健康的选择。

IF 5.4 1区心理学

Psychological review Pub Date : 2026-07-09 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000642